What happens to femoral neck bone mineral density after hip resurfacing surgery?

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 92 B, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 1648-1653

  Cordingley, R ^a   Kohan, L ^a,b   Ben Nissan, B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b Joint Orthopaedic Centre   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE RESECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK; FEMUR NECK FRACTURE; HIP RESURFACING SURGERY; HIP SURGERY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SECONDARY OSTEOPOROSIS; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE DENSITY; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78650143302     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B12.22141     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Back DL, Dalziel R, Young D, Shimmin A. Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings: an independent prospective study of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:324-9.
2. Steffen RT, Pandit HP, Palan J, et al. The five-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2008;90- B:436-41. (Pubitemid 351542858)
3. McMinn DJW. Development of metal/metal hip resurfacing. Hip Int 2003;13:41-53.
4. Beaulé PE, Dorey FJ, LeDuff M, Gruen T, Amstutz HC. Risk factors affecting outcome of metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop 2004;418:87-93. (Pubitemid 38140428)
5. Taylor M. Finite element analysis of the resurfaced femoral head. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2006;220:289-97.
6. Healey JH, Vigorita VJ, Lane JM. The coexistence and characteristics of osteoarthritis and osteoporosis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1985;67-A:586-92.
7. Dequeker J, Johnell O. Osteoarthritis protects against femoral neck fracture: the MEDOS study experience. Bone 1993;14(Suppl 1):51-6.
8. Genant HK, Grampp S, Glüer CC, et al. Universal standardization for dual x-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results. J Bone Miner Res 1994;9:1503-14. (Pubitemid 24300099)
9. Hayaishi Y, Miki H, Nishii T, et al. Proximal femoral bone mineral density after resurfacing total hip arthroplasty and after standard stem-type cementless total hip arthroplasty, both having similar neck preservation and the same articulation type. J Arthroplasty 2007;22:1208-13. (Pubitemid 350216977)
10. Harty JA, Devitt B, Harty LC, Molloy M, McGuinness A. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry analysis of peri-prosthetic stress shielding in the Birmingham resurfacing hip replacement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2005;125:693-5. (Pubitemid 41782437)
11. Nevitt MC, Lane NE, Scott JC, et al. Radiographic osteoarthritis of the hip and bone mineral density: the study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Arthritis Rheum 1995;38:907-16.
12. Fazzalari NL, Darracott J, Vernon-Roberts B. Histomorphometric changes in the trabecular structure of a selected stress region in the femur in patients with osteoarthritis and fracture of the femoral neck. Bone 1985;6:125-33. (Pubitemid 15021913)
13. Preidler KW, White LS, Tashkin J, et al. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometric densitometry in osteoarthritis of the hip: influence of secondary bone remodelling of the femoral neck. Acta Radiol 1997;38:539-42.
14. Seeman E. From density to structure: growing up and growing old on the surfaces of the bone. J Bone Miner Res 1997;12:509-21. (Pubitemid 27155210)
15. Seeman E. Osteoporosis in men. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol 1997;11:613-29.
16. No authors listed. Note for guidance on good clinical practice (CPMP/ICH/135/95). Source: Department of health and ageing. Theraputic Goods Administration (TGA) Australia. July 2000.
17. Blake GM, Fogelman I. Interpretation of bone densitometry studies. Semin Nucl Med 1997;27:248-60.
18. Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC, et al. Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures: the study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Lancet 1993;341:72-5. (Pubitemid 23028113)
19. Kerr DR, Kohan L. Local infiltration analgesia: a technique for the control of acute postoperative pain following knee and hip surgery: a case study of 325 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 2008;79:1-10.
20. Theis JC, Beadel G. Changes in proximal femoral bone density around a hydroxyapatite- coated hip joint arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2003;11:48-52. (Pubitemid 36999109)
21. Mirsky EC, Einhorn TA. Bone densitometry in orthopaedic practice. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1998;80-A:1687-99.
22. Cohen B, Rushton N. Accuracy of DEXA measurement of bone mineral density after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1995;77-B:497-83.
23. Martini F, Lebherz C, Mayer F, et al. Precision of the measurements of periprosthetic bone mineral density in hips with a custom-made femoral stem. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2000;82-B:1065-71.
24. Henry MJ, Pasco JA, Pocock NA, Nicholson GC, Kotowicz MA. Reference ranges for bone densitometers adopted Australia-wide: Geelong osteoporosis study. Australas Radiol 2004;48:473-5. (Pubitemid 40040842)
25. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I: conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-83.
26. Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NM, et al. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ 1992;305:160-4.
27. Garratt AM, Ruta DA, Abdalla MI, Buckingham JK, Russell IT. The SF-36 health survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS? BMJ 1993;306:1440-4. (Pubitemid 23154746)
28. Mayhew PM, Thomas CD, Clement JG, et al. Relation between age, femoral neck cortical stability and hip fracture risk. Lancet 2005;366:129-35. (Pubitemid 40991213)
29. Faulkner KG. Improving femoral bone density measurements. J Clin Densitom 2003;6:353-8. (Pubitemid 38114512)
30. Leslie WD, Ward LM. Bone density monitoring with the total hip site: time for a reevaluation? J Clin Densitom 2004;7:269-74. (Pubitemid 39178894)
31. Pocock N, Culton N, Noakes K, Harmelin D. Discordant normal ranges for proximal femur bone density in Australia. Osteoporos Int 2001;12:576-80. (Pubitemid 32777435)
32. Compston JE, Cooper C, Kanis JA. Bone densitometry in clinical practice. BMJ 1995;310:1507-10.
33. Pauwels F. Biomechanics of the normal and diseased hip: theoretical foundations, technique and results. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1976.
34. Anglin C, Masri BA, Tonetti J, Hodgson AJ, Greidanus NV. Hip resurfacing femoral neck fracture influenced by valgus placement. Clin Orthop 2007;465:71-9. (Pubitemid 350306496)
35. Richards CJ, Giannitsios D, Huk OL, et al. Risk of periprosthetic femoral neck fracture after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: valgus compared with anatomic alignment: a biomechanical and clinical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2008;90-A(Suppl 3):96-101.
36. Melton LJ 3rd. Epidemiology of spinal osteoporosis. Spine 1997;22(Supp):2-11.
37. Düppe H, Gärdsell P, Johnell O, Milsson BE, Ringsberg K. Bone mineral density, muscle strength and physical activity. Acta Orthop Scand 1997;68:97-103.
38. Gustavsson A, Thorsen K, Nordström P. A 3-year longitudinal study of the effect of physical activity on the accrual of bone mineral density in healthy adolescent males. Calcif Tissue Int 2003;73:108-14. (Pubitemid 37082356)
39. Nordin BE, Need AG, Steurer T, et al. Nutrition, osteoporosis, and aging. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1998;854:336-51.
40. Little CP, Ruiz AL, Harding IJ, et al. Osteonecrosis in retrieved femoral heads after failed resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:320-3. (Pubitemid 40424857)
41. Pocock NA, Eisman JA, Yeates MG, Sambrook PN, Ebert S. Physical fitness is a major determinant of femoral and lumbar spine bone mineral density. J Clin Invest 1986;78:618-21. (Pubitemid 16024793)
42. Shibata Y, Ohsawa I, Watanabe T, Miura T, Sato Y. Effects of physical training on bone mineral density and bone metabolism. J Physiol Anthropol Appl Human Sci 2003;22:203-8. (Pubitemid 39220778)
43. Kiratli BJ, Heiner JP, McBeath AA, Wilson MA. Determination of bone mineral density by dual x-ray absorptiometry in patients with uncemented total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 1992;10:836-44.
44. Engh CA Jr, McGovern TF, Bobyn JD, Harris WH. A quantitive evaluation of periprosthetic bone-remodelling after cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1992;74-A:1009-20.
45. Kilgus DJ, Shimaoka EE, Tipton JS, Eberle RW. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry measurement of bone mineral density around porous-coated cementless femoral implants: methods and preliminary results. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1993;75-B:279-87. (Pubitemid 23087186)
46. Kishida Y, Sugano N, Nishiii T, et al. Preservation of the bone mineral density of the femur after surface replacement of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2004;86-B:185-9. (Pubitemid 38386854)
47. Faulkner KG, Genant HK, McClung M. Bilateral comparison of femoral bone density and hip axis length from single and fan beam DXA scans. Calcif Tissue Int 1995;56:26-31.
48. Bonnick SL, Nichols DL, Sanborn CF, et al. Right and left proximal femur analyses: is there a need to do both? Calcif Tissue Int 1996;58:307-10. (Pubitemid 26136792)
49. Rao AD, Reddy S, Rao DS. Is there a difference between right and left femoral bone density? J Clin Densitom 2000;3:57-61. (Pubitemid 30243315)
50. Arokoski JP, Arokoski MH, Jurvelin JS, et al. Increased bone mineral content and bone size in the femoral neck of men with hip osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2002;61:145-50. (Pubitemid 34098430)