Pre- and post-test mathematical modelling of a plan-asymmetric reinforced concrete frame building

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 35, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 1359-1379

  Fajfar, Peter ^a   Dolšek, Matjaž ^a   Marušić, Damjan ^a   Stratan, Aurel ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

^b POLITEHNICA UNIVERSITY OF TIMISOARA   (Romania)

Author keywords

Displacement controlled analysis; Mathematical modelling; Non linear dynamic analysis; Plan asymmetric building; Pseudo dynamic test; Reinforced concrete building

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PLASTICITY; REINFORCED CONCRETE; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

DISPLACEMENT-CONTROLLED ANALYSIS; PLAN-ASYMMETRIC BUILDING; PSEUDO-DYNAMIC TEST;

STRUCTURAL FRAMES;

CONCRETE STRUCTURE; DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; GROUND MOTION; LABORATORY METHOD; MULTISTOREY BUILDING; NUMERICAL MODEL; PLASTICITY; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE; TESTING METHOD;

EID: 33748650783     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.583     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Han SW, Kwon O-S, Lee L-H. Evaluation of the seismic performance of a three-story ordinary moment-resisting concrete frame. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2004; 33:669-685.
2. Giberson MF. The response of nonlinear multi-story structures subjected to earthquake excitation, EERL Report, Earthquake Engineering Research Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, 1967.
3. Dides MA, de la Llera JC. A comparative study of concentrated plasticity models in dynamic analysis of building structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2005; 34:1005-1026.
4. Otani S. Nonlinear earthquake response analysis of reinforced concrete buildings. Lecture notes, ROSE School, Universita degli Studi di Pavia, 2002.
5. Li KN. 3-Dimensional Nonlinear Static and Dynamic Structural Analysis Computer Program. CANNY Consultants Pte Ltd.: Singapore, 2002.
6. PEER. Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (OpenSees). Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, 1999. http://opensees.berkeley.edu/
7. Stratan A, Fajfar P. Influence of Modelling Assumptions and Analysis Procedure on the Seismic Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete GLD Frames. University of Ljubljana, 2002. www.ikpir.com/projects/spear/
8. Stratan A, Fajfar P. Seismic Assessment of the SPEAR Test Structure. University of Ljubljana, 2003. www.ikpir.com/projects/spear/
9. Priestley MJN. Displacement-based seismic assessment of reinforced concrete buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 1997; 1(1):157-192.
10. Paulay T, Priestley MJN. Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings. Wiley: New York, 1992.
11. Marušií D, Fajfar P. Final Pre-test Analysis of the SPEAR Test Building. University of Ljubljana, 2003. www.ikpir.com/projects /spear/
12. Negro P, Mola E, Molina FJ, Magonette GE. Full-scale testing of a torsionally unbalanced three-storey non-seismic RC frame. Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, paper 968, 2004.
13. Jeong S-H, Elnashai A. Analytical assessment of the seismic performance of an irregular RC frame for fullscale 3D pseudo-dynamic testing, Part I: analytical model verification. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 2005; 9(1):95-128.
14. Jeong S-H, Elnashai A. Analytical assessment of the seismic performance of an irregular RC frame for fullscale 3D pseudo-dynamic testing, Part II: condition assessment and test development. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 2005; 9(2):265-284.
15. Dolšek M, Fajfar P. Mathematical modelling of an infilled RC frame structure based on the results of pseudodynamic tests. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31:1215-1230.
16. Calvi GM, Magenes G, Pampanin S. Relevance of beam-column joint damage and collapse in RC frame assessment. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 2002; 6(1):75-100.
17. FEMA 356. Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, 2000.
18. Peruš I, Poljanšek K, Fajfar P. Flexural deformation capacity of rectangular RC columns determined by the CAE method. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2006, in press.
19. Dolšek M, Fajfar P. Post-test Analyses of the SPEAR Test Building. University of Ljubljana, 2005. www.ikpir.com/projects/spear/
20. Peruš I, Fajfar P. On the inelastic torsional response of single-storey structures under bi-axial excitation. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2005; 34:931-941.
21. Marušić D, Fajfar P. On the inelastic seismic response of asymmetric buildings under bi-axial excitation. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2005; 34:943-963.