Seismic response of a RC frame building designed according to old and modern practices

Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 779-799

  Rozman, Matej ^a   Fajfar, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

Eurocode 8; N2 method; Pushover analysis; RC frame building; Seismic assessment; SPEAR building

Indexed keywords

EUROCODE 8; N2 METHOD; PUSHOVER ANALYSIS; RC FRAME BUILDING; SEISMIC ASSESSMENT; SPEAR BUILDING;

BUILDING CODES; BUILDING MATERIALS; COLUMNS (STRUCTURAL); MACHINE DESIGN; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMIC RESPONSE;

BUILDINGS;

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; BUILDING CODE; CONCRETE STRUCTURE; MODERNIZATION; NONLINEARITY; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMIC RESPONSE;

EID: 67651033627     PISSN: 1570761X     EISSN: 15731456     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-009-9119-4     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. EC 0 (2002) Basis of structural design, European standard EN 1990. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels
2. EC 1 (2002) Actions on structures, part 1-1: general actions-densities, self-weight, imposed loads for buildings, European standard EN 1991-1-1. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels
3. EC 2 (2004) Design of concrete structure, part 1-1: general rules and rules for buildings, European standard EN 1992-1-1. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels
4. EC 8-1 (2004) Design of structures for earthquake resistance, part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, European standard EN 1998-1. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels
5. EC 8-3 (2005) Design of structures for earthquake resistance, part 3: strengthening and repair of buildings, European standard EN 1998-3. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels
6. ELSA (2005) SPEAR seismic performance assessment and rehabilitation of existing buildings. European Laboratory for Structural Assessment, Ispra. http://elsa.jrc.ec.europa.eu/term-activity.php?id=2
7. P Fajfar 1999 Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 28 9 979 993 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199909)28:9<979: :AID-EQE850>3.0.CO;2-1
8. P Fajfar 2000 A nonlinear analysis method for the performance-based seismic design Earthq Spectr 16 573 592 10.1193/1.1586128
9. P Fajfar D Marušić I Peruš 2005 Torsional effects in the pushover-based seismic analysis of buildings J Earthq Eng 9 6 831 854 10.1142/S1363246905002249
10. P Fajfar M Dolšek D Marušić A Stratan 2006 Pre- and post-test mathematical modelling of a plan-asymmetric reinforced concrete frame building Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 35 11 1359 1379 10.1002/eqe.583
11. Fardis M, Negro P (eds) (2005) Seismic performance assessment and rehabilitation of existing buildings. Proceedings of the international workshop, Ispra, 4-5 April 2005. EC JRC, European Laboratory for Structural Assessment, Ispra
12. S-H Jeong A Elnashai 2005 Analytical assessment of the seismic performance of an irregular RC frame for fullscale 3D pseudo-dynamic testing, part I: analytical model verification J Earthq Eng 9 1 95 128 10.1142/S1363246905001906
13. S-H Jeong A Elnashai 2005 Analytical assessment of the seismic performance of an irregular RC frame for fullscale 3D pseudo-dynamic testing, part II: condition assessment and test development J Earthq Eng 9 2 265 284 10.1142/S1363246905001918
14. AJ Kosmopoulos MN Fardis 2007 Estimation of inelastic seismic deformations in asymmetric multi-storey RC buildings Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 36 9 1209 1234 10.1002/eqe.678
15. G Magliulo G Maddaloni E Cosenza 2007 Comparison between non-linear dynamic analysis performed according to EC8 and elastic and non-linear static analyses Eng Struct 29 2893 2900 10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.01.027
16. o 968
17. TB Panagiotakos MN Fardis 2001 Deformations of reinforced concrete members at yielding and ultimate ACI Struct J 98 2 135 148
18. TB Panagiotakos MN Fardis 2004 Seismic performance of RC frames designed to Eurocode 8 or to the Greek codes 2000 Bull Earthq Eng 2 221 259 10.1007/s10518-004-2288-2
19. PEER (2007) University of Washington. The UW-PEER reinforced concrete column test database. http://www.ce.washington.edu/~peera1/. Accessed 20 July 2008
20. I Peruš K Poljanšek P Fajfar 2006 Flexural deformation capacity of rectangular RC columns determined by the CAE method Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 35 11 1453 1470 10.1002/eqe.584
21. I Peruš P Fajfar 2007 Prediction of the force-drift envelope for RC columns in flexure by the CAE method Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 36 15 2345 2363 10.1002/eqe.735
22. SAP2000 (2002) Analysis reference manual. Computers and Structures, Inc., Berkeley