Incremental dynamic analysis for estimating seismic performance sensitivity and uncertainty

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 141-163

  Vamvatsikos, Dimitrios ^a   Fragiadakis, Michalis ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CYPRUS   (Cyprus)

^b NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Epistemic uncertainty; First order second moment; Incremental dynamic analysis; Latin hypercube sampling; Monte carlo; Performance based earthquake engineering

Indexed keywords

CIVIL ENGINEERING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; EARTHQUAKES; ENGINEERING GEOLOGY; GEOMETRY; HARDENING; MODEL STRUCTURES; MONTE CARLO METHODS; ROTATION; SEISMIC WAVES; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

EPISTEMIC UNCERTAINTIES; FIRST ORDER SECOND MOMENT; INCREMENTAL DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; LATIN HYPERCUBE SAMPLING; MONTE CARLO; PERFORMANCE-BASED EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; MULTISTOREY BUILDING; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; SAMPLING; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STEEL STRUCTURE; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 77952544047     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.935     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. SAC/FEMA. Recommended seismic design criteria for new steel moment-frame buildings. Report No. FEMA-350, SAC Joint Venture, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, 2000.
2. Luco N, Cornell CA. Effects of random connection fractures on demands and reliability for a 3-story pre-Northridge SMRF structure. Proceedings of the 6th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 244. EERI: El Cerrito, CA, Seattle, WA, 1998; 1-12.
3. Luco N, Cornell CA. Effects of connection fractures on SMRF seismic drift demands. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 2000; 126:127-136.
4. Foutch DA, Shi S. Effects of hysteresis type on the seismic response of buildings. Proceedings of the 6th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 409. EERI: El Cerrito, CA, Seattle, WA, 1998; 1-12.
5. Ibarra LF. Global collapse of frame structures under seismic excitations. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 2003.
6. Porter KA, Beck JL, Shaikhutdinov RV. Sensitivity of building loss estimates to major uncertain variables. Earthquake Spectra 2002; 18(4):719-743.
7. Lee TH, Mosalam KM. Seismic demand sensitivity of reinforced concrete shear-wall building using FOSM method. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2005; 34(14):1719-1736.
8. Rubinstein RY. Simulation and the Monte Carlo Method. Wiley: New York, 1981.
9. Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA. Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31(3):491-514.
10. Liel AB, Haselton CB, Deierlein GG, Baker JW. Incorporating modeling uncertainties in the assessment of seismic collapse risk of buildings. Structural Safety 2009; 31(2):197-211.
11. Dolsek M. Incremental dynamic analysis with consideration of modelling uncertainties. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2009; 38(6):805-825.
12. Foutch DA, Yun SY. Modeling of steel moment frames for seismic loads. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 2002; 58:529-564.
13. McKenna F, Fenves G, Jeremic B, Scott M. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation, 2000. Available from http://opensees.berkeley.edu [May 2008].
14. Fragiadakis M, Vamvatsikos D, Papadrakakis M. Evaluation of the influence of vertical irregularities on the seismic performance of a 9-storey steel frame. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2006; 35(12):1489-1509.
15. Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA. Developing efficient scalar and vector intensity measures for IDA capacity estimation by incorporating elastic spectral shape information. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2005; 34(13):1573-1600.
16. Luco N, Bazzurro P. Does amplitude scaling of ground motion records result in biased nonlinear structural drift responses? Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2007; 36(13):1813-1835.
17. Luco N, Cornell CA. Structure-specific, scalar intensity measures for near-source and ordinary earthquake ground motions. Earthquake Spectra 2007; 23(3):357-392.
18. Baker JW, Cornell CA. Vector-valued intensity measures incorporating spectral shape for prediction of structural response. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 2008; 12(4):534-554.
19. Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA. Applied incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Spectra 2004; 20(2):523-553.
20. Benjamin JR, Cornell CA. Probability, Statistics, and Decision for Civil Engineers. McGraw-Hill: New York, 1970.
21. McKay MD, Conover WJ, Beckman R. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 1979; 21(2):239-245.
22. Iman R. Latin Hypercube Sampling. Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences. Wiley: New York. DOI: 10.1002/0471667196.ess1084.pub2.
23. Iman RL, Conover WJ. A distribution-free approach to inducing rank correlation among input variables. Communication in Statistics Part B: Simulation and Computation 1982; 11(3):311-334.
24. Cornell CA, Jalayer F, Hamburger RO, Foutch DA. The probabilistic basis for the 2000 SAC/FEMA steel moment frame guidelines. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2002; 128(4):526-533.
25. Jalayer F. Direct probabilistic seismic analysis: implementing non-linear dynamic assessments. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 2003. Available from: http://www.stanford.edu/group/rms/Thesis/FatemehJalayer.pdf [October 2008].
26. Rosenblueth E. Point estimates for probability. Applied Mathematical Modeling 1981; 5:329-335.
27. Baker JW, Cornell CA. Uncertainty propagation in probabilistic seismic loss estimation. Structural Safety 2008; 30(3):236-252.
28. Pinto PE, Giannini R, Franchin P. Seismic Reliability Analysis of Structures. IUSS Press: Pavia, Italy, 2004.
29. Zhang JT. A simple and efficient monotone smoother using smoothing splines. Journal of Nonparametric Statistics 2004; 16(5):779-796.
30. Fragiadakis M, Vamvatsikos D. Fast performance uncertainty estimation via pushover and approximate IDA. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2009; submitted.