An exploration of the initial effects of stereoscopic displays on optometric parameters

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 33-44

  Fortuin, Marten F ^a,b,e   Lambooij, Marc T ^b,c   IJsselsteijn, Wijnand A ^b   Heynderickx, Ingrid ^c,d   Edgar, David F ^e   Evans, Bruce JW ^e,f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c PHILIPS RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (Netherlands)

^d DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^e CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^f Institute of Optometry   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

3 D image; Asthenopia; Binocular vision; Reading speed; Stereoscopic vision; Television

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE FIXATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZATION; READING; TELEVISION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VISUAL ACUITY;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; DATA DISPLAY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RANDOM ALLOCATION; READING; TELEVISION; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISUAL ACUITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78650043671     PISSN: 02755408     EISSN: 14751313     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2010.00804.x     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Hyde Park Editorial. Stereoscopic 3D Movies and TV are here. Binocul Vis Strabismus Q 2009; 24: 48.
2. Pölönen M, Salminaa M, Aaltonen V et al. Subjective measures of presence and discomfort in viewers of color-seperation-based stereoscopic cinema. J of the SID 2009; 17: 459-466.
3. Lambooij M, IJsselsteijn WA, Fortuin MF et al. Visual discomfort and visual fatigue of stereoscopic displays: a review. J Imaging Sci Technol 2009; 53: 1-13.
4. Holliman NS. Three-dimensional display systems. In: Handbook of Optoelectronics (Dakin JP & Brown RGW, editor), Taylor & Francis, London, 2006; pp. 1067-1100.
5. IJsselsteijn WA. Presence in Depth. Eindhoven University of Technology, the Netherlands, 2004.
6. Chinnock C. Philips decides to shut down 3D operation. Display Daily 2009;, accessed 5/11/2010.
7. IJzerman WL, De Zwart ST & Dekker T. Design of 2D/3D switchable displays. SID '05 DIGEST 2005; 36: 98-101.
8. Van Berkel C & Clarke JA. Characterization and optimization of 3D-LCD module design. Proceedings of the SPIE 1997; 3012: 179-187.
9. Lang J. A new stereotest. J Ped Ophthalmol Strab 1983; 20: 72-74.
10. De Boer CN, Verleur R, Heuvelman A et al. Added value of an autostereoscopic multiview 3-D display for advertising in a public environment. Displays 2010; 31: 1-8.
11. Rajae-Joordens RJE & Heynderickx I. Multi-dimensional optimization of visual content. In: Visual Perception: New Research (Nilsson IL & Lindberg WV, editor), Nova science, New York, 2008; pp. 117-155.
12. Meesters LMJ, IJsselsteijn WA & Seuntiëns PJH. A survey of perceptual evaluations and requirements of three-dimensional TV. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 2004; 14: 381-391.
13. IJsselsteijn WA, Seuntiëns PJH & Meesters LMJ. Human factors of 3D displays. In: 3D Videocommunication - Algorithms, Concepts and Real-Time Systems in Human-Centred Communication (Schreer O, Kauff P & Sikora T, editor), John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2005; pp. 219-234.
14. Hoffmann DM, Girshick AR, Akeley K et al. Vergence accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue. J Vision 2008; 8: 1-30.
15. Peli E. Optometric and perceptual issues with head-mounted displays. In: Visual Instrumentation (Mouroulis P, editor), McGraw-Hill, New York, 1999; pp. 205-276.
16. Pastoor S & Wöpking M. 3-D displays: a review of current technologies. Displays 1997; 17: 100-110.
17. Ukai K & Kato Y. The use of video refraction to measure the dynamic properties of the near triad in observers of a 3-D display. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2002; 22: 385-388.
18. Schor CM. Analysis of tonic and accommodative vergence disorders of binocular vision. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1983; 60: 1-14.
19. Morgan MW. Accommodation and vergence. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1968; 45: 417-454.
20. Emoto M, Nojiri Y & Okano F. Changes in fusional vergence limit and its hysteresis after viewing stereoscopic TV. Displays 2004; 25: 67-76.
21. Evans BJW. Pickwell's Binocular Vision Anomalies. Elsevier, Oxford, 2007.
22. Okada Y, Ukai K, Wolffsohn JS et al. Target spatial frequency determines the response to conflicting defocus- and convergence-driven accommodative stimuli. Vision Res 2006; 46: 475-484.
23. Peli E. The visual effects of head-mounted display HMD are not distinguishable from those of desk-top computer display. Vision Res 1998; 38: 2053-2066.
24. Kooi FL & Toet A. Visual comfort of binocular and 3D displays. Displays 2004; 25: 99-108.
25. Gall R, Wick B & Bedell H. Vergence facility: establishing clinical utility. Optom Vis Sci 1998; 75: 731-742.
26. Daum KM. A comparison of the results of tonic and phasic vergence training. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1983; 60: 769-775.
27. Brown B & Lovie-Kitchen J. Repeated visual acuity measurement: establishing the patient's own criterion for change. Optom Vis Sci 1993; 70: 45-53.
28. Eskridge JB, Amos JF & Bartlett JD. Clinical Procedures in Optometry. Lippincott, Philadelphia, PA, 1991.
29. Hofstetter HW. A comparison of Duane's and Donders' tables of the amplitude of accommodation. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1944; 21: 345-363.
30. Schiffman RM, Christianson MD, Jacobsen G et al. Reliability and validity of the Ocular Surface Disease Index. Arch Ophthalmol 2000; 118: 615-621.
31. Srinivasan S, Joyce E, Boone A et al. Tear lipocalin and lysozyme concentrations in postmenopausal women. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2010; 30: 257-266.
32. Efron N. Grading scales for contact lens complications. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1998; 18: 182-186.
33. Borsting EJ, Rouse MW, Mitchell GL et al. Validity and reliability of the revised convergence insufficiency symptom survey in children aged 9 to 18 years. Optom Vis Sci 2003; 80: 832-838.
34. Borsting E, Rouse MW, DeLand PN et al. Prospective comparison of convergence insufficiency and normal binocular children on CIRS symptom surveys. Optom Vis Sci 1999; 76: 221-228.
35. Rouse MW, Borsting EJ, Mitchell GL et al. Validity and reliability of the revised convergence insufficiency symptom survey in adults. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2004; 24: 384-390.
36. Rouse M, Borsting E, Mitchell GL et al. Validity of the convergence insufficiency symptom survey: a confirmatory study. Optom Vis Sci 2009; 86: 357-363.
37. Ehrmann K, Fedtke C & Radic A. Assessment of computer generated vision charts. Cont Lens and Anterior Eye 2009; 32: 133-140.
38. Karania R & Evans BJW. The Mallett Fixation Disparity Test: influence of test instructions and relationship with symptoms. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2006; 26: 507-522.
39. Kaptein R & Heynderickx I. Effect of crosstalk in multi-view autostereoscopic 3D displays on perceived image quality. SID Symposium digest of technical papers 2007; 38: 1220-1223.
40. Wilkins AJ, Jeanes RJ, Pumfrey PD et al. Rate of reading test: its reliability, and its validity in the assessment of the effects of coloured overlays. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1996; 16: 491-497.
41. Northway N. Predicting the continued use of overlays in school children - a comparison of the Developmental Eye Movement test and the Rate of Reading test. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2003; 23: 457-464.
42. Wilkins A. Coloured overlays and their effects on reading speed: a review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2002; 22: 448-454.
43. Evans BJW & Joseph F. The effect of coloured filters on the rate of reading in an adult student population. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2002; 22: 535-545.
44. Mon-Williams M, Wann JP & Rushton S. Binocular vision in a virtual world: visual deficits following the wearing of a head-mounted display. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1993; 13: 387-391.
45. Evans BJW. Optometric prescribing for decompensated heterophoria. Optom in Practice 2008; 9: 63-78.
46. Brautaset RL & Jennings JAM. Measurements of objective and subjective fixation disparity with and without a central fusion stimulus. Med Sci Monit 2006; 2: MT1-MT4.
47. Antona B, Barrio A, Barra F et al. Repeatability and agreement in the measurement of horizontal fusional vergences. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2008; 28: 475-491.
48. Beeson PM & Robey RR. Evaluating single-subject treatment research: lessons learned from the aphasia literature. Neuropsychol Rev 2006; 16: 161-169.
49. Lambooij M, IJsselsteijn WA, Fortuin MF, Evans BJW & Heynderickx I. Measuring visual discomfort associated with 3D displays. J of the SID 2010; 18: 931-943.
50. Häkkinen J, Takatalo J, Kilpelainen M et al. Determining limits to avoid double vision in an autostereoscopic display: disparity and image element width. J of the SID 2009; 17: 433-441.
51. Rushton SK & Riddell PM. Developing visual systems and exposure to virtual reality and stereo displays: some concerns and speculations about the demands on accommodation and vergence. Appl Ergon 1999; 30: 69-78.
52. Tsukuda S & Murai Y. A case report of manifest esotropia after viewing anaglyph stereoscopic movie. Jpn Orthopt J 1988; 16: 69-72.
53. Ukai K & Howarth PA. Visual fatigue caused by viewing stereoscopic motion images: background, theories and observations. Displays 2008; 29: 106-116.
54. Kvarnstrom G, Jakobsson P & Lennerstrand G. Visual screening of Swedish children: an ophthalmological evaluation. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2001; 79: 240-244.
55. Robaei D, Rose KA, Kifley A et al. Factors associated with childhood strabismus: findings from a population-based study. Ophthalmology 2006; 113: 1146-1153.
56. Van Nes FL. Visually representing reality; aesthetics and accessibility aspects. Proceedings of the SPIE 2009; 7240: 1L1-1L9.
57. Ministero della Salute. Occhiali 3D Per La Visione Di Spettacoli Cinematografici. Dipartimento prevenzione e comuniccazione, Roma, Italy, 2010 accessed 9/9/2010.
58. Wann JP, Rushton S & Mon-Williams M. Natural problems in the perception of virtual environments. Vision Res 1995; 35: 2731-2736.
59. Kozulin P, Ames SL & McBrien NA. Effects of a head-mounted display on the oculomotor system of children. Optom Vis Sci 2009; 86: 845-856.
60. Emoto M, Niida T & Okana F. Repeated vergence adaptation causes the decline of visual functions in watching stereoscopic television. J Display Technol 2005; 1: 328-340.
61. Elliott DB, Yang KCH & Whitaker D. Visual acuity changes throughout adulthood in normal, healthy eyes: seeing beyond 6/6. Optom Vis Sci 1995; 72: 186-191.