Cryoprotectant and freezing-process alter the ability of chicken sperm to acrosome react

Animal Reproduction Science

Volumn 122, Issue 3-4, 2010, Pages 359-366

  Moce E ^a   Grasseau, I ^a   Blesbois, E ^a  

^a UMR85 PHYSIOLOGIE DE LA REPRODUCTION ET DES COMPORTEMENTS   (France)

Author keywords

Acrosome reaction; Chicken; Perivitelline layer; Sperm; Spermatozoa

Indexed keywords

ACETAMIDE DERIVATIVE; CRYOPROTECTIVE AGENT; GLYCEROL; N,N DIMETHYLACETAMIDE;

ACROSOME REACTION; ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; CELL MEMBRANE; CHICKEN; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CRYOPRESERVATION; DRUG EFFECT; HEAT; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SPERM PRESERVATION; SPERMATOZOON; SPERMATOZOON MOTILITY; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACETAMIDES; ACROSOME REACTION; ANIMALS; CELL MEMBRANE; CHICKENS; CRYOPRESERVATION; CRYOPROTECTIVE AGENTS; GLYCEROL; HOT TEMPERATURE; MALE; SEMEN PRESERVATION; SPERM MOTILITY; SPERMATOZOA;

AVES;

EID: 78649886167     PISSN: 03784320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.10.010     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bailey J.L., Bilodeau J.F., Cormier N. Sperm cryopreservation in domestic animals: a damaging and capacitating phenomenon. J. Androl. 2000, 21:1-7.
2. Barbato G.F., Cramer P.G., Hammerstedt R.H. A practical in vitro sperm-egg binding assay that detects subfertile males. Biol. Reprod. 1998, 58:686-699.
3. Blesbois E. Current status in avian semen cryopreservation. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 2007, 63:213-222.
4. Blesbois E., Brillard J.P. Specific features of in vivo and in vitro sperm storage in birds. Animal 2007, 1:1472-1481.
5. Blesbois E., Seigneurin F., Grasseau I., Limouzin C., Besnard J., Gourichon D., Coquerelle G., Tixier-Boichard M. Semen cryopreservation for ex-situ management of genetic diversity in chicken. Poult. Sci. 2007, 87:555-564.
6. Blesbois E., Grasseau I., Seigneurin F., Mignon-Grasteau S., Saint Jalme M., Mialon-Richard M.M. Predictors of success of semen cryopreservation in chickens. Theriogenology 2008, 69:252-261.
7. Bramwell R.K., Marks H.L., Howarth B. Quantitative determination of spermatozoa penetration of the perivitelline layer of the hen's ovum as assessed on oviposited eggs. Poult. Sci. 1995, 74:1875-1883.
8. Brillard J.P., McDaniel G.R. The reliability and efficiency of various methods for estimating spermatozoa concentration. Poult. Sci. 1985, 64:155-158.
9. Burrows W.H., Quinn J.P. The collection of spermatozoa from the domestic fowl and turkey. Poult. Sci. 1937, 14:251-254.
10. Chalah T., Seigneurin F., Blesbois E., Brillard J.P. In vitro comparison of fowl sperm viability in ejacultes frozen by three different techniques and relationship with subsequent fertility in vivo. Cryobiology 1999, 39:185-191.
11. Donoghue A.M., Wishart G.J. Storage of poultry semen. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2000, 62:213-232.
12. Froman D.P. Sperm mobility in birds: insights from fowl sperm. Soc. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl. 2007, 65:293-308.
13. Hammerstedt R.H., Graham J.K. Cryopreservation of poultry sperm: the enigma of glycerol. Cryobiology 1992, 29:26-38.
14. Lake P.E. The male in reproduction. Physiology and Biochemistry of the Domestic Fowl 1984, vol. 3:1411-1447. Academic Press, London.
15. Lemoine M., Grasseau I., Brillard J.P., Blesbois E. A reappraisal of the factors involved in in vitro initiation of the acrosome reaction in chicken spermatozoa. Reproduction 2008, 136:391-399.
16. Lemoine M., Dupont J., Guillory V., Tesseraud S., Blesbois E. Potential involvement of several signaling pathways in initiation of the chicken acrosome reaction. Biol. Reprod. 2009, 81:657-665.
17. Lemoine, M., Mignon-Grasteau, S., Grasseau, I., Magistrini, M., Blesbois, E., 2010. Ability of chicken spermatozoa to undergo acrosome reaction after liquid storage or cryopreservation. Theriogenology (in press. doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.07.17).
18. Long J.A. Avian sperm cryopreservation: what are the biological challenges?. Poult. Sci. 2006, 85:232-236.
19. Mocé E., Graham J.K. In vitro evaluation of sperm quality. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2008, 105:104-118.
20. Peron A., Gómez J., Mignon-Grasteau S., Sellier N., Besnard J., Derouet M., Juin H., Carre B. Effects of wheat quality on digestion differ between the D+ and D- chicken lines selected for divergent digestion capacity. Poult. Sci. 2006, 85:462-469.
21. Purdy P.H., Song Y., Silversides F.G., Blackburn H.D. Evaluation of glycerol removal techniques, cryoprotectants, and insemination methods for cryopreserving rooster sperm with implications of regeneration of breed or line or both. Poult. Sci. 2009, 88:2184-2191.
22. Seigneurin F., Blesbois E. Effects of the freezing rate on viability and fertility of frozen-thawed fowl spermatozoa. Theriogenology 1995, 43:1351-1358.
23. Sexton T.J., Fewlass T.A. A new poultry semen extender 2, Effect of the diluent components on the fertilizing capacity of chicken semen stored at 5 degrees C. Poult. Sci. 1978, 57:277-284.
24. Steele M.G., Meldrum W., Brillard J.P., Wishart G.J. The interaction of avian spermatozoa with the perivitelline layer in vitro and in vivo. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1994, 101:599-603.
25. Tselutin K., Narubina T., Mavrodina T., Tur B. Cryopreservation of poultry semen. Br. Poult. Sci. 1995, 36:805-811.
26. Tselutin K., Seigneurin F., Blesbois E. Comparison of cryoprotectants and methods of cryopreservation of fowl spermatozoa. Poult. Sci. 1999, 78:586-590.
27. Verstegen J., Iguer-Ouada M., Onelin K. Computer assisted semen analyzers in andrology research and veterinary practice. Theriogenology 2002, 57:149-179.
28. Wishart G.J. Quantitation of the fertilizing ability of fresh compared with frozen and thawed fowl spermatozoa. Br. Poult. Sci. 1985, 26:375-380.
29. Woelders H., Zuidberg C.A., Hiemstra S.J. Animal genetic resources conservation in The Netherlands and Europe: poultry perspective. Poult. Sci. 2006, 85:216-222.