Animal genetic resources conservation in The Netherlands and Europe: Poultry perspective

Poultry Science

Volumn 85, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 216-222

  Woelders, Henri ^a   Zuidberg, C A ^a   Hiemstra, S J ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cryopreservation; Europe; Farm animal genetic diversity; Poultry; Semen

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA;

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; BREEDING; CHICK EMBRYO; CHICKEN; CRYOPRESERVATION; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; MALE; POULTRY; SPERM PRESERVATION; TURKEY (BIRD);

ANIMALS; BREEDING; CHICK EMBRYO; CHICKENS; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; CRYOPRESERVATION; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; GENETIC RESEARCH; MALE; POULTRY; SEMEN PRESERVATION; TURKEYS; VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 33645738861     PISSN: 00325791     EISSN: 15253171     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ps/85.2.216     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Bakst, M. R., and T. J. Sexton. 1979. Fertilizing capacity and ultrastructure of fowl and turkey spermatozoa before and after freezing. J. Reprod. Fertil. 55:1-7.
2. Blesbois, E., and C. Labbé. 2003. Main improvements in semen and embryo cryopreservation for fish and fowl. Pages 55-65 in Workshop on Cryopreservation of Animal Genetic Resources in Europe, Paris. D. Planchenault, ed. FAO, Rome, Italy.
3. CBD. Convention on Biological Diversity (Rio de Janeiro, 1992). Available: www.biodiv.org/ Accessed Oct. 20, 2005.
4. Chalah, T., F. Seigneurin, E. Blesbois, and J. P. Brillard. 1999. In vitro comparison of fowl sperm viability in ejaculates frozen by three different techniques and relationship with subsequent fertility in vivo. Cryobiology 39:185-191.
5. Danchin-Burge, C. 2005. Mise en place de cryo-collections patrimoniales de races d'animaux d'élevage, Cas de la France et des autres pays européens. Proc. 31st, Journee d'étude, Les Haras Nationaux, Arnac-Pompadour, France.
6. Hammerstedt, R. H., and J. K. Graham. 1992. Cryopreservation of poultry sperm: The enigma of glycerol. Cryobiology 29:26-38.
7. Hiemstra, S. J., T. van der Lende, and H. Woelders. 2005. The potential of cryoconservation and reproductive technologies for animal genetic resources conservation strategies. Pages 25-41 in Proc. Int. Worksh. The Role of Biotechnology for the Characterization and Conservation of Crop, Forestry, Animal and Fishery Genetic Resources, Villa Giuliana, Turin, Italy. FAO, Rome, Italy.
8. Lake, P. E. 1968. Observations of freezing fowl spermatozoa in liquid nitrogen. Pages 1633-1635 in Proc. VIth Int. Congr. on Anim. Reprod. Artificial Insemination, Paris, France. INRA, Jouy en Josas, France.
9. LNV, National Report on Animal Genetic Resources, The Netherlands. Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality, 2002. S. J. Hiemstra, ed. Centre for Genetic Resources, The Netherlands (CGN), Lelystad, The Netherlands. http://www.cgn.wur.nl/angr/documents/NationalReport.pdf. Accessed Oct. 20, 2005.
10. Mazur, P. 1985. Basic concepts in freezing cells. Pages 91-111 in Proc. First Int. Conf. on Deep Freezing of Boar Semen. L. A. Johnson and K. Larsson, ed. Agricultural University Uppsala, Sweden.
11. Meuwissen, T. H. E. 1999. Operation of conservation schemes. Pages 91-112 in Genebanks and the Conservation of Farm Animal Genetic Resources. J. K. Oldenbroek, ed. ID-DLO, Lelystad, The Netherlands.
12. Sonesson, A. K., M. E. Goddard, and T. H. Meuwissen. 2002. The use of frozen semen to minimize inbreeding in small populations. Genet. Res. 80:27-30.
13. Song, Y., S. D'Costa, S. L. Pardue, and J. N. Petitte. 2005. Production of germline chimeric chickens following the administration of a busulfan emulsion. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 70:438-444.
14. Tselutin, K., F. Seigneurin, and E. Blesbois. 1999. Comparison of cryoprotectants and methods of cryopreservation of fowl spermatozoa. Poult. Sci. 78:586-590.
15. Van Voorst, A., and F. R. Leenstra. 1995. Fertility rate of daily collected and cryopreserved fowl semen. Poult. Sci. 74:136-140.
16. Verrier, E., C. Danchin-Burge, S. Moureaux, L. Ollivier, M. Tixier-Boichard, M. J. Maignel, J. P. Bidanel, and F. Clement. 2003. What should be preserved: genetic goals and collection protocols for the French National Cryobank. Pages 79-89 in Workshop on Cryopreservation of Anim. Genet. Res. Eur. D. Planchenault, ed. Bureau des Resources Génétiques, Paris, France.
17. Wishart, G. J. 1985. Quantitation of the fertilizing ability of fresh compared with frozen and thawed fowl spermatozoa. Br. Poult. Sci. 26:375-380.
18. Woelders, H., C. A. Zuidberg, H. Sulkers, and S. J. Hiemstra. 2004. Preservation of genetic diversity of farm animals; gene-banking of germplasm. Pages 87-95 in Proc. 20th Sci. Mtg. Eur. Embryo Transfer Assoc. (Association, Européene de Transfert Embryonnaire, AETE), Lyon, France. AETE, Lyon, France.