Semen cryopreservation for ex situ management of genetic diversity in chicken: Creation of the french avian cryobank

Poultry Science

Volumn 86, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 555-564

  Blesbois, E ^a   Seigneurin, F ^b   Grasseau, I ^a   Limouzin, C ^b   Besnard, J ^a   Gourichon, D ^b   Coquerelle, G ^b   Rault, P ^b   Tixier Boichard, M ^b  

^a STATION DE RECHERCHES AVICOLES   (France)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

Chicken; Cryobank; Ex situ management of genetic diversity; Frozen semen

Indexed keywords

AVES; MYCOPLASMA; SALMONELLA;

ACETAMIDE DERIVATIVE; CRYOPROTECTIVE AGENT; GLYCEROL; N,N DIMETHYLACETAMIDE;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; CHICKEN; DRUG EFFECT; FEMALE; FERTILITY; FRANCE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; SPERM PRESERVATION; SPERMATOZOON;

ACETAMIDES; ANIMALS; CHICKENS; CRYOPROTECTIVE AGENTS; FEMALE; FERTILITY; FRANCE; GLYCEROL; MALE; SEMEN PRESERVATION; SPERM BANKS; SPERMATOZOA; VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 34250308454     PISSN: 00325791     EISSN: 15253171     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ps/86.3.555     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Alderson, L., A. Arav, R. Cardellino, C. Danchin-Burge, B. Gajda, G. Gandini, E. Groeneveld, I. Grigaliunaite, S. J. Hiemstra, A. Maki-Tanila, A. Martin, I. Miceikiene, M. Pàsztor, F. Pizzi, D. Planchenault, R. Ruiz de Villalobos Zabala, T. A. Schmidt, S. Townsend, M. Tvedt, J. Windig, and H. Woelders. 2003. Guidelines for the Constitution of National Cryopreservation Programmes for Farm Animals. 1st input TS, 2nd SH, 3rd CDB, 4th TS, 5th SH, 6th Lelystad meeting. Hiemstra S.T., Lelystad, the Netherlands.
2. Berri, C., N. Wacrenier, N. Millet, and E. Le Bihan-Duval. 2001. Effects of selection for improved body composition on muscle and meat characteristics of broilers from experimental and commercial lines. Poult. Sci. 80:833-838.
3. Blackburn, H. D. 2004. Development of national animal genetic resource programs. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 16:27-32.
4. Blackburn, H. D. 2006. The national animal germplasm program: Challenges and opportunities for poultry genetic resources. Poult. Sci. 85:210-215.
5. Blesbois, E., and I. Grasseau. 2002. Seminal plasma affects liquid storage and cryopreservation of turkey sperm. In Cryo 2001, 38th Meet. Soc. Cryobiology; 2002/07/29-/08/01, 103. Soc. Cryobiol., Edinburgh, UK.
6. Blesbois, E., I. Grasseau, and F. Seigneurin. 2005. Membrane fluidity and the ability to survive cryopreservation in domestic bird spermatozoa. Reproduction 129:371-378.
7. Blesbois, E., and C. Labbé. 2003. Main improvements in semen and embryo cryopreservation for fish and fowl. Pages 55-66 in Cryopreservation of Animal Genetic Resources in Europe. D. Planchenault, ed. BRG, Paris, France.
8. Blesbois, E., F. Seigneurin, I. Grasseau, J. Besnard, and P. Rault. 2002. Guide de procédures pour la congélation des semences aviaries. INRA-SYSAAF, Tours, France.
9. Blom, E. 1950. A one minute live-dead sperm stain by means of eosin-nigrosin. Fertil. Steril. 1:176-177.
10. Bordas, A., and F. Minvielle. 1999. Patterns of growth and feed intake in divergent lines of laying domestic fowl selected for residual feed consumption. Poult. Sci. 78:317-323.
11. Brillard, J. P., and J. Mc Daniel. 1985. The reliability and efficiency of various methods for estimating spermatozoa concentration. Poult. Sci. 64:155-158.
12. Burrows, W., and J. Quinn. 1937. The collection of spermatozoa from the domestic fowl and turkey. Poult. Sci. 16:19-24.
13. Cerda, R. O., G. I. Giacoboni, J. A. Xavier, P. L. Sansalone, and M. F. Landoni. 2002. In vitro antibiotic susceptibility of field isolates of mycoplasma in Argentina. Avian Dis. 46:215-218.
14. Chalah, T., and J. P. Brillard. 1998. Comparison of assessment of fowl sperm viability by eosin-nigrosin and dual fluorescence (SYBR-14/IP). Theriogenology 50:487-493.
15. Chalah, T., F. Seigneurin, E. Blesbois, and J. P. Brillard. 1999. In vitro comparison of fowl sperm viability in ejaculates frozen by three different techniques and relationship with subsequent fertility in vivo. Cryobiology 39:185-191.
16. Danchin-Burge, C., and S. J. Hiemstra. 2003. Cryopreservation of domestic animal species in France and Netherlands: Experience, similarities and differences. Pages 15-28 in Workshop on Cryopreservation of Animal Genetic Resources in Europe. D. Planchenault, ed. Online. http://www.brg.prd.fr/brg/ textePdfs/SiaColloqueDocument.pdf
17. Dohner, J. V. 2001. The encyclopaedia of historic and endangered livestock and poultry breeds. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, CT.
18. Gabarrou, J. F., P. A. Géraert, M. Picard, and A. Bordas. 1997. Diet-induced thermogenesis in cockerels is modulated by genetic selection for high or low residual feed intake J. Nutr. 127:2371-2376.
19. Gee, G. F. 1995. Artificial insemination and cryopreservation of semen from nondomestic birds. Pages 262-280 in Proc. First Symp. Artif. Insem. Poult. M. R. Bakst and G. J. Wishart, ed. PSA, Savoy, IL.
20. Guernec, A., C. Berri, B. Chevalier, N. Wacrenier-Cere, E. Le Bihan-Duval, and M. J. Duclos. 2003. Muscle development, insulin-like growth factor-I and myostatin mRNA levels in chickens selected for increased breast muscle yield. Growth Horm. IGF Res. 13:8-18.
21. Hammerstedt, R. H. 1995. Cryopreservation of poultry semen - Current status and economics. 229-250 in Proc. First Symp. Artif. Insem. Poult. M. R. Bakst and G. J. Wishart, ed. Poult. Sci. Assoc., Savoy, IL.
22. International Chicken Polymorphisms Map Consortium. 2004. A genetic variation map for chicken with 2.8 million single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Nature 432:717-722.
23. Kempf, I., C. Ollivier, and R. L'hospitalier. 1988. Concentrations minimales inhibitrices de 13 antibiotiques vis-à-vis de 21 souches de mycoplasmes des volailles. Point Vét. 20:935-940.
24. Labbé, C., E. Blesbois, B. Leboeuf, P. Guillouet, G. Stradaioli, and M. Magistrini. 2003. Technologie de la conservation du sperme chez plusieurs vertébrés domestiques: Protection des lipides membranaires, intégrité du noyau et élargissement des méthodes. Pages 25-33 in Congrès du Bureau des Ressources Génétiques; La Châtre (FRA); 2002/10/15-17.
25. Le Bihan-Duval, E., S. Mignon-Grasteau, N. Millet, and C. Beaumont. 1998. Genetic analysis of a selection experiment on increased body weight and breast muscle weight as well as on limited fat weight. Br. Poult. Sci. 39:346-353.
26. Massip, A., S. P. Leibo, and E. Blesbois. 2004. Cryobiology and the breeding of domestic animals. Pages 371-392 in Life in the Frozen State. E. Benson, B. Fuller, and N. Lane, ed. Taylor and Francis Group, London, UK.
27. Miller, M. M., L. D. Bacon, K. Hala, H. D. Hunt, S. J. Ewald, J. Kaufman, R. Zoorob, and W. E. Briles. 2004. Nomenclature for the chicken major histocompatibility (B and Y) complex. Immunogenetics 56:261-279.
28. Morisson, M., A. Bordas, J. M. Petit, C. Jayat-Vignoles, R. Julien, and F. Minvielle. 1997. Associated effects of divergent selection for residual feed consumption on reproduction, sperm characteristics, and mitochondria of spermatozoa. Poult. Sci. 76:425-431.
29. Petite, J. N. 2006. Avian germplasm preservation: Embryonic stem cells or primordial germ cell. Poutr. Sci. 85:237-242.
30. Pisenti, J. M., M. E. Delany, R. L. Taylor, U. K. Abbott, H. Abplanalp, J. A. Arthur, M. R. Bakst, C. Baxter-Jones, J. J. Bitgoof, F. A. Bradley, K. M. Cheng, R. R. Dietert, J. B. Dodgson, A. M. Donoghe, A. B. Emsley, R. J. Etches, R. R. Frahm, R. J. Gerritz, P. F. Goetinck, A. A. Grunder, D. E. Harry, S. J. Lamont, G. R. Martin, P. E. McGuire, G. P. Moberg, L. L. Pierro, C. O. Qualset, M. A. Qureshu, F. T. Shultz, and B. W. Wilson. 1999. Avian genetic resources at risk: An assessment and proposal for conservation of genetic stocks in the USA and Canada. Report no. 20. Univ. California Div. Agric. Nat. Res., Genet. Resources Conserv. Program, Davis, CA.
31. Plachy, J., M. Vilhelmova, I. Karakoz, and J. Schulmannova. 1989. Prague inbred lines of chickens: A biological model for MHC research. Folia Biol. (Praha) 35:177-196.
32. Reedy, S. E., S. P. Leibo, M. E. Clark, and R. J. Etches. 1995. Beyond freezing semen. Pages 229-261 in Proc. First Symp. Artif. Insem. Poult. M. R. Bakst and G. J. Wishart, ed. Poult. Sci. Assoc., Savoy, IL.
33. Ricard, F. H., G. Marché, and E. Lebihan-Duval. 1994. Essai d'amélioration par sélection de la qualité de la carcasse du poulet de chair. INRA Prod. Anim. 7:253-261.
34. Seigneurin, F., and E. Blesbois. 1995. Effects of freezing rate on viability and fertility of frozen-thawed fowl spermatozoa. Theriogenology 43:1351-1358.
35. Tajima, A. 2002. Production of germ-line chimeras and their application in domestic chicken. Anim. Poult. Biol. Rev. 13:15-30.
36. Tixier-Boichard, M., G. Coquerelle, M. Durand-Tardif, D. Planchenault, V. Jamilloux, E. Blesbois, M. Boulay, H. Chapuis, and M. Reffay. 2001. Biodiversity of domestic birds. Br. Poult. Sci. 42:S29-S31.
37. Tselutin, K., F. Seigneurin, and E. Blesbois. 1999. Comparison of cryoprotectants methods of cryopreservation of fowl spermatozoa. Poult. Sci. 78:586-590.
38. Van de Lavoir, M. C., J. H. Diamond, P. A. Leighton, C. Mather-Love, B. S. Heyer, R. Bradshaw, A. Kerchner, L. T. Hooi, T. M. Gessaro, S. E. Swanberg, M. E. Delany, and R. J. Etches. 2006. Germline transmission of genetically modified primordial germ cells. Nature 441:766-769.
39. Woelders, H., A. Zuidberg, and S. J. Hiemstra. 2006. Animal genetic resources conservation in the Netherlands and Europe: Poultry perspective. Poult. Sci. 85:216-222.