Phonological facilitation from pictures in a word association task: Evidence for routine cascaded processing in spoken word production

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 63, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 2289-2296

  Humphreys, Karin R ^a   Boyd, Candice H ^a   Watter, Scott ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cascaded processing; Phonological facilitation; Picture word interference; Spoken word production

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; METHODOLOGY; PAIRED ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHONETICS; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; SPEECH; STUDENT; UNIVERSITY;

HUMANS; PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHONETICS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; SPEECH; STUDENTS; UNIVERSITIES; VOCABULARY;

EID: 78649859397     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2010.509802     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bloem, I., & La Heij, W. (2003). Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in word translation: Implications for models of lexical access in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 468-488.
2. Bloem, I., van den Boogaard, S., & La Heij, W. (2004). Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in language production: Further evidence for the conceptual selection model of lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 307-323.
3. Cutting, J. C., & Ferreira, V. S. (1999). Semantic and phonological information flow in the production lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 25, 318-344.
4. Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283-321.
5. Goldrick, M. (2006). Limited interaction in speech production: Chronometric, speech error, and neuropsychological evidence. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 817-855.
6. Jescheniak, J. D., Oppermann, F., Hantsch, A., Wagner, V., Mädebach, A., & Schriefers, H. (2009). Do perceived context pictures automatically activate their phonological code? Experimental Psychology, 56, 56-65.
7. Jescheniak, J. D., & Schriefers, H. (1998). Discrete serial versus cascaded processing in lexical access in speech production: Further evidence from the coactivation of near-synonyms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1256-1274.
8. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-38.
9. Levelt, W. J. M., Schriefers, H., Vorberg, D., Meyer, A. S., Pechman, T., & Havinga, J. (1991). The time course of lexical access in speech production: A study of picture naming. Psychological Review, 98, 122-142.
10. Logan, G., & Schulkind, M. (2000). Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: I. Semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1072-1090.
11. Meyer, A. S., & Damian, M. F. (2007). Activation of distractor names in the picture-picture interference paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 35, 494-503.
12. Morsella, E., & Miozzo, M. (2002). Evidence for a cascade model of lexical access in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 555-563.
13. Navarrete, E., & Costa, A. (2005). Phonological activation of ignored pictures: Further evidence for a cascade model of lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 359-377.
14. Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1998). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Retrieved October 15, 2007, from http://www.usf.edu/FreeAssociation
15. Oppermann, F., Jescheniak, J. D., Schriefers, H., & Görges, F. (2010). Semantic relatedness among objects promotes the activation of multiple phonological codes during object naming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 356-370.
16. Peterson, R. R., & Savoy, P. (1998). Lexical selection and phonological encoding during language production: Evidence for cascaded processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 539-557.
17. Roelofs, A. (2008). Tracing attention and the activation flow in spoken word planning using eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 353-368.
18. Rossion, B., & Pourtois, G. (2004). Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart's object set: The role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition. Perception, 33, 217-236.
19. Schiller, N. O., Groten, N., & Christoffels, I. K. (2005). The fate of non-produced picture names. Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, 10, 22.
20. Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1990). Exploring the time-course of lexical access in speech production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 86-102.
21. Watter, S., & Logan, G. D. (2006). Parallel response selection in dual-task situations. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 254-277.