Are natural microcosms useful model systems for ecology?

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 19, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 379-384

  Srivastava, Diane S ^a   Kolasa, Jurek ^b   Bengtsson, Jan ^c   Gonzalez, Andrew ^d   Lawler, Sharon P ^e   Miller, Thomas E ^f   Munguia, Pablo ^f   Romanuk, Tamara ^g   Schneider, David C ^h   Trzcinski, M Kurtis ⁱ  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^d MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^f FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^h MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND   (Canada)

ⁱ DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; MICROCOSM;

EID: 3042690870     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2004.04.010     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Levins R. The strategy of model building in population biology. Sober E. Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology. 1984;18-27 Cambridge University Press
2. Lawler S.P. Ecology in a bottle: using microcosms to test theory. Resetarits W.J. Jr, Bernando J. Experimental Ecology: Issues and Perspectives. 1998;236-253 Oxford University Press
3. Jessup C.M., et al. Big questions, small worlds: microbial model systems in ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19:2004;189-197
4. Carpenter S.R. Microcosm experiments have limited relevance for community and ecosystem ecology. Ecology. 77:1996;677-680
5. Schindler D.W. Replication versus realism: the need for ecosystem-scale experiments. Ecosystems. 1:1998;323-334
6. Krebs C.J. Population cycles revisited. J. Mammal. 77:1996;8-24
7. Kneitel J.M., Miller T.E. Resource and top-predator regulation in the pitcher plant (Sarracenia purpurea) inquiline community. Ecology. 83:2002;680-688
8. Fincke O.M., et al. Predation by odonates depresses mosquito abundance in water-filled tree holes in Panama. Oecologia. 112:1997;244-253
9. Miller T.E., et al. Effect of community structure on invasion success and rate. Ecology. 83:2002;898-905
10. Srivastava D.S., Lawton J.H. Why more productive sites have more species: an experimental test of theory using tree-hole communities. Am. Nat. 152:1998;510-529
11. Bengtsson J. Interspecific competition increases local extinction rate in a metapopulation system. Nature. 340:1989;713-715
12. Levine J.M. Local interactions, dispersal, and native and exotic plant diversity along a California stream. Oikos. 95:2001;397-408
13. Miller T.E., et al. Trophic interactions in the phytotelmata communities of the pitcher plant, Sarracenia purpurea. Commun. Ecol. 3:2002;109-116
14. Tilman D. Ecological experimentation: strengths and conceptual problems. Likens G.E. Long-Term Studies in Ecology. 1989;136-157 Springer-Verlag
15. Duffy J.E. Biodiversity loss, trophic skew and ecosystem functioning. Ecol. Lett. 6:2003;680-687
16. Srivastava D.S. The role of conservation in expanding biodiversity research. Oikos. 98:2002;351-360
17. Gonzalez A., Chaneton E.J. Heterotroph species extinction, abundance and biomass dynamics in an experimentally fragmented microecosystem. J. Anim. Ecol. 71:2002;594-602
18. Gonzalez A., et al. Metapopulations dynamics, abundance, and distribution in a microecosystem. Science. 281:1998;2045-2047
19. McCann K.S. The diversity-stability debate. Nature. 405:2000;228-233
20. Romanuk T.N., Kolasa J. Environmental variability alters the relationship between richness and variability of community abundances in aquatic rock pool microcosms. Ecoscience. 9:2002;55-62
21. Kolasa J., Li B.-L. Removing the confounding effect of habitat specialization reveals the stabilizing contribution of diversity to species variability. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B. 270:(Suppl.):2003;S198-S201
22. Kneitel J.M., Miller T.E. Dispersal rates affect species composition in metacommunities of Sarracenia purpurea inquilines. Am. Nat. 162:2003;165-171
23. Mouquet N., et al. Community assembly time and the relationship between local and regional richness. Oikos. 103:2003;618-626
24. Munguia P. Successional patterns on pen shell communities at local and regional scales. J. Anim. Ecol. 73:2004;64-74
25. Starzomski B.M., Bondrup-Nielsen S. Analysis of movement and the consequence for metapopulation structure of the forked fungus beetle, Bolitotherus cornutus Panzer (Tenebrionidae). Ecoscience. 9:2002;20-27
26. Heard S.B. Resource patch density and larval aggregation in mushroom-breeding sites. Oikos. 81:1998;187-195
27. Hanski I., Ranta E. Coexistence in a patchy environment: three species of Daphnia in rock pools. J. Anim. Ecol. 52:1983;263-279
28. Kiflawi M., et al. The relative impact of local and regional processes on macro-invertebrate species richness in temporary pools. J. Anim. Ecol. 72:2003;447-452
29. Mouquet N., Loreau M. Coexistence in metacommunities: the regional similarity hypothesis. Am. Nat. 159:2002;420-426
30. Inouye B.D. Integrating nested spatial scales: implications for the coexistence of competitors on a patchy resource. J. Anim. Ecol. 68:1999;150-162
31. Ives A.R. Aggregation and coexistence in a carrion fly community. Ecol. Monogr. 61:1991;75-94
32. Wertheim B., et al. Species diversity in a mycophagous insect community: the case of spatial aggregation vs. resource partitioning. J. Anim. Ecol. 69:2000;335-351
33. Toda M.J., et al. Coexistence mechanisms of mycophagous drosophilids on multispecies fungal hosts: aggregation and resource partitioning. J. Anim. Ecol. 68:1999;794-803
34. Krijger C.L., Sevenster J.G. Higher species diversity explained by stronger spatial aggregation across six neotropical Drosophila communities. Ecol. Lett. 4:2001;106-115
35. Taub F.B. Unique information contributed by multispecies systems: examples from the standardized aquatic microcosm. Ecol. Appl. 7:1997;1103-1110
36. Naeem S. Experimental validity and ecological scale as criteria for evaluating research programs. Gardner R.H., et al. Scaling Relations In Experimental Ecology. 2001;223-250 Columbia University Press
37. Sota T., et al. Habitat stability and the larval mosquito community in treeholes and other containers on a temperate island. Res. Popul. Ecol. 36:1994;93-104
38. Therriault T.W., Kolasa J. Physical determinants of richness, diversity, evenness and abundance in natural aquatic microcosms. Hydrobiologia. 412:1999;123-130
39. Petersen J.E., et al. Multiscale experiments in coastal ecology: improving realism and advancing theory. Bioscience. 53:2003;1181-1197
40. Huston M.A. Microcosm experiments have limited relevance for community and ecosystem ecology: synthesis of comments. Ecology. 80:1999;1088-1089
41. Lawton J.H. Ecological experiments with model systems. Science. 269:1995;328-331
42. Schneider D.C. Spatial allometry: theory and application to experimental and natural aquatic ecosystems. Gardner R.H., et al. Scaling Relations In Experimental Ecology. 2001;113-153 Columbia University Press
43. Trzcinski M.K., et al. Colonisation of pitcher plant leaves at several spatial scales. Ecol. Entomol. 28:2003;482-489
44. Buckley H.L., et al. Reverse latitudinal trends in species richness of pitcher-plant food webs. Ecol. Lett. 6:2003;825-829
45. Harvey E., Miller T.E. Variance in composition of inquiline communities in leaves of Sarracenia purpurea L on multiple spatial scales. Oecologia. 108:1996;562-566
46. Cochran-Stafira D.L., Ende C.N.V. Integrating bacteria into food webs: studies with Sarracenia purpurea inquilines. Ecology. 79:1998;880-898
47. Heard S.B. Pitcher-plant midges and mosquitoes: a processing chain commensalism. Ecology. 75:1994;1647-1660
48. Miner J.A., Taylor P.D. Effects of peatland size and exposure on two species of Diptera inhabiting the pitcher plant Sarracenia purpurea L. Ecoscience. 9:2002;347-354
49. Krawchuk M.A., Taylor P.D. Changing importance of habitat structure across multiple spatial scales for three species of insects. Oikos. 103:2003;153-161