Construction of a fuzzy QFD failure matrix using a fuzzy multiple-objective decision model

Journal of Engineering Design

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 677-692

  Erginel, Nihal ^a  

^a ANADOLU UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Decision model; Fuzzy; Multiple objective; Quality function deployment; Two phase approach

Indexed keywords

BACKHOE LOADERS; DECISION MODELS; DESIGN FAILURES; FAILURE INFORMATION; FUZZY; FUZZY QFD; GLOBAL COMPETITION; MANUFACTURING PROCESS; MATRIX; MULTIPLE OBJECTIVE MODELS; MULTIPLE OBJECTIVES; QUALITY CHARACTERISTIC; QUALITY COSTS; QUALITY PLANS; REAL APPLICATIONS; TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES; TWO-PHASE APPROACH;

COSTS; LOADERS; MODELS; QUALITY ASSURANCE; QUALITY CONTROL; QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

EID: 78649672765     PISSN: 09544828     EISSN: 14661837     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09544820902810261     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Akao, Y., 1990. Quality function deployment: integrating customer requirements into product design. Cambridge, MA: Productivity Press.
2. Armacost, R.L., et al., 1994.AnAHP framework for prioritizing customer requirements in QFD: an industrialized housing application. IIE Transactions, 26 (4), 72-79.
3. Ayäg, Z. and Özdemir, R.G., 2007. An analytic network process-based approach to concept evaluation in a new product development environment. Journal of Engineering Design, 18 (3), 209-226.
4. Bode, J. and Fung, R.Y.K., 1998. Cost engineering with QFD. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 35 (3-4), 587-590.
5. Chan, L.K., et al., 1999. Rating the importance of customer needs in QFD by fuzzy and entropy methods. International Journal of Production Research, 37 (11), 2499-2518.
6. Chen, L.H. and Weng, M.C., 2006. An evaluation approach to engineering design in QFD processes using fuzzy goal programming models. European Journal of Operational Research, 172 (1), 230-248.
7. Cristiano, J.J., Liker, J.K., and White, C.C., 2001. Key factors in the successful application of quality function deployment. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48 (1), 81-95.
8. Erginel, N., 2007. A fuzzy multiple objective decision model to select the significant quality characteristics of a product. Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Computers and Industrial Engineering, Alexandria, Egypt, 1780-1789.
9. Fung, R.Y.K., et al., 2003. Modeling of quality function deployment planning with resource allocation. Research in Engineering Design, 14 (4), 247-255.
10. Han, C.H., Kim, J.K., and Choi, S.H., 2004. Prioritizing engineering characteristics in quality function deployment with incomplete information: a linear partial ordering approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 91 (3), 235-249.
11. Hauser, J.R. and Clausing, D., 1988. The house of quality. Harvard Business Review, 66 (3), 63-73.
12. Kahraman, C., Ertay, T., and Büyüközkan, G., 2006.A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 171 (2), 390-411.
13. Karsak, E.E., 2004. Fuzzy multiple objective programming framework to prioritize design requirements in quality function deployment. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 47 (2-3), 149-163.
14. Karsak, E.E., Sozer, S., and Alptekin, S.E., 2002. Product planning in quality function deployment using a combined analytic network process and goal programming approach. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 44 (1), 171-190.
15. Khoo, L.P. and Ho, N.C., 1996. Framework of a fuzzy quality function deployment system. International Journal of Production Research, 34 (2), 299-311.
16. King, B., 1987. Better designs in half the time: implementing QFD in America. Methuen, MA: GOAL/QPC.
17. Lai, X., Xie, M., and Tan, K.C., 2005. Dynamic programming for QFD optimization. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 21 (8), 769-780.
18. Lai, X., et al., 2008. Ranking of customer requirements in a competitive environment. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 54 (2), 202-214.
19. Lee, E.S. and Li, R.J., 1993. Fuzzy multiple objective programming and compromise programming with Pareto optimum. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 53 (3), 275-288.
20. Lu, M., et al., 1994. Integrating QFD, AHP, and benchmarking in strategic marketing. Journal of Business Industry Marketing, 9 (1), 41-50.
21. Mazur, G.H., 1993. QFD for service industries, from voice of customer to task deployment. Fifth Symposium on Quality Function Deployment, Novi, Michigan.
22. Nagamachi, M., 2002. Kansei engineering as a powerful consumer-oriented technology for product development. Applied Ergonomics, 33 (3), 289-294.
23. Park, T. and Kim, K., 1998. Determination of an optimal set of design requirements using house of quality. Journal of Operation Management, 16 (5), 569-581.
24. Raharjo, H., Xie, M., and Brombacher, A.C., 2006. Prioritizing quality characteristics in dynamic quality function deployment. International Journal of Production Research, 44 (23), 5005-5018.
25. Reich, Y. and Paz, A., 2008. Managing product quality, risk, and resources through resource quality function deployment. Journal of Engineering Design, 19 (3), 249-267.
26. Stamatis, D.H., 1995. Failure mode and effect analysis from theory to execution. WI, USA: ASQC Quality Press.
27. Wang, J., 1999. Fuzzy outranking approach to prioritize design requirements in QFD. International Journal of Production Research, 37 (4), 899-916.
28. Wang, H., Xie, M., and Goh, T.N., 1998. A comparative study of prioritization matrix method and the analytic hierarchy process technique in quality function deployment. Total Quality Management, 9 (6), 421-430.
29. Wasserman, G.S., 1993. On how to prioritize design requirements during the QFD planning process. IIE Transactions, 25 (3), 59-65.
30. Zimmerman, H.J., 1978. Fuzzy programming and linear programming with several objective functions. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1 (1), 45-55.