Embodied Concept Learning

Handbook of Cognitive Science

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 313-331

  Bergen, Benjamin ^a   Feldman, Jerome ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649672283     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-046616-3.00016-5     Document Type: Chapter

References (64)

1. Aziz-Zadeh L., Cattaneo L., Rochat M., Rizzolatti G. Covert speech arrest induced by rTMS over both motor and non-motor left hemisphere frontal sites. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2005, 17(6).
2. Baciu M.V., Rubin C., Décorps M.A., Segebarth C.M. fMRI assessment of hemispheric language dominance using a simple inner speech paradigm. NMR in Biomedicine 1999, 12(5):293-298.
3. Bailey, D. (1997). When Push Comes to Shove: A Computational Model of the Role of Motor Control in the Acquisition of Action Verbs. Ph.D. Thesis, UC Berkeley.
4. Barsalou L.W. Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1999, 22:577-609.
5. Bergen B., Chang N. Embodied construction grammar in simulation-based language understanding. Construction Grammars: Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions 2005, 147-190. Benjamin, Amsterdam. J.-O. Östman, M. Fried (Eds.).
6. Bergen B., Lindsay S., Matlock T., Narayan S. Spatial and linguistic aspects of visual imagery in sentence comprehension. Cognitive Science 2007, 31(5):733-764.
7. Bloom L. The Transition from Infancy to Language: Acquiring the Power of Expression 1993, Cambridge University Press, New York.
8. Bloom P. How Children Learn the Meanings of Words 2000, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
9. Boroditsky L. Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition 2000, 75(1):1-28.
10. Boroditsky L. Does language shape thought? English and Mandarin speakers' conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology 2001, 43(1):1-22.
11. Boroditsky L. Linguistic Relativity. Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science 2003, 917-921. MacMillan Press, London. L. Nadel (Ed.).
12. Buccino G., Riggio L., Melli G., Binkofski F., Gallese V., Rizzolatti G. Listening to action-related sentences modulates the activity of the motor system: A combined TMS and behavioral study. Cognitive Brain Research 2005, 24:355-363.
13. Carroll, L. (1865). Alice's Adventures in Wonderland.
14. Chang, N., Feldman, J., Porzel, R., & Sanders, K. (2002). Scaling Cognitive Linguistics: Formalisms for Language Understanding. Proceedings of 1st International Workshop on Scalable Natural Language Understanding. Heidelberg, Germany.
15. Chang, N., & Mok, E. (2006). A structured context model for grammar learning. The 2006 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. Vancouver, B.C.
16. Choi S. Caregiver input in English and Korean: Use of nouns and verbs in book-reading and toy-play contexts. Journal of Child Language 2000, 27:69-96.
17. Chomsky N. Rules and Representations 1980, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
18. Dancygier B., Sweetser E. Mental Dpaces in Grammar: Conditional Constructions 2005, Cambridge University Press, New York.
19. Edelman G. Neural Darwinism. The Theory of Neuronal Group Selection 1987, Basic Books, New York.
20. Ehrsson H.H., Geyer S., Naito E. Imagery of voluntary movement of fingers, toes, and tongue activates corresponding body-part specific motor representations. Journal of Neurophysiology 2003, 90:3304-3316.
21. Fauconnier G. Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language 1985, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
22. Fauconnier G., Turner M. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind's Hidden Complexities 2002, Basic Books, New York.
23. Fodor J. Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong 1998, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
24. Gallese V., Lakoff G. The brain's concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in reason and language. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2005.
25. Gibbs R.W., Bogdanovich J.M., Sykes J.R., Barr D.J. Metaphor in idiom comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 1997, 37:141-154.
26. Glenberg A., Kaschak M. Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2002, 9:558-565.
27. Glenberg A.M., Havas D., Becker R., Rinck M. Grounding language in bodily states: The case for emotion. The Grounding of Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thinking 2005, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA. R. Zwaan, D. Pecher (Eds.).
28. Grady J.E. Theories are buildings revisited. Cognitive Linguistics 1997, 8(4):267-290.
29. Hauk O., Johnsrude I., Pulvermüller F. Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron 2004, 41(2):301-307.
30. Hockett C.F. The origin of speech. Scientific American 1960, 203:88-96.
31. Hoff E. Language Development 2001, Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, CA. 2nd ed.
32. Johnson, C. R. (1999). Constructional Grounding: The Role of Interpretational Overlap in Lexical and Constructional Acquisition. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
33. Kaup B., Zwaan R.A. Effects of negation and situational presence on the accessibility of text information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2003, 29.
34. Kosslyn S., Ganis G., Thompson W. Neural foundations of imagery. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2001, 2:635-642.
35. Lakoff G. The contemporary theory of metaphor. Metaphor and Thought 1993, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA. 2nd ed. A. Ortony (Ed.).
36. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors We Live by 1980, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
37. Livesay J., Liebke A., Samaras M., Stanley A. Covert speech behavior during a silent language recitation task. Perceptual Motor Skills 1996, 83(3 Pt 2):1355-1362.
38. Lotze M., Montoya P., Erb M., Hülsmann E., Flor H., Klose U., Birbaumer N., Grodd W. Activation of cortical and cerebellar motor areas during executed and imagined hand movements: An fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1999, 11(5):491-501.
39. Majid A., Bowerman M., Kita S., Haun D., Levinson S. Can language restructure cognition? The case for space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004, 8(3):108-114.
40. Mandler J.M. How to build a baby: II. Conceptual primitives. Psychological Review 1992, 99(4):587-604.
41. Mandler J.M. The foundations of mind: The origins of the conceptual system 2004, Oxford University Press, New York.
42. Matlock T. Fictive motion as cognitive simulation. Memory & Cognition 2004, 32(8):1389-1400.
43. McDonough L., Choi S., Mandler J. Understanding spatial relations: Flexible infants, lexical adults. Cognitive Psychology 2003, 46:229-259.
44. Meltzoff A.N., Prinz W. The Imitative Mind: Development, Evolution, and Brain Bases 2002, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
45. Moon C., Cooper R.P., Fifer W.P. Two-day olds prefer their native language. Infant Behaviour and Development 1993, 16:495-500.
46. Narayanan, S. (1997). KARMA: Knowledge-based Action Representations for Metaphor and Aspect. Ph.D. Thesis, UC Berkeley.
47. Narayanan, S. (1999). Moving right along: A computational model of metaphoric reasoning about events. Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence AAAI-99. Orlando, Florida.
48. Nyberg L., Petersson K.-M., Nilsson L.-G., Sandblom J., Åberg C., Ingvar M. Reactivation of motor brain areas during explicit memory for actions. NeuroImage 2001, 14:521-528.
49. Pecher D., Zeelenberg R., Barsalou L.W. Verifying properties from different modalities for concepts produces switching costs. Psychological Science 2003, 14:119-124.
50. Pecher D., Zeelenberg R., Barsalou L.W. Sensorimotor simulations underlie conceptual representations: Modality-specific effects of prior activation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2004, 11:164-167.
51. Pinker S., Jackendoff R. What's special about the human language faculty?. Cognition 2005, 95(2):201-236.
52. Porro C., Francescato M., Cettolo V., Diamond M., Baraldi P., Zuian C., Bazzocchi M., diPrampero P. Primary motor and sensory cortex activation during motor performance and motor imagery: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Neuroscience 1996, 16:7688-7698.
53. Pulvermüller F., Haerle M., Hummel F. Walking or talking?: Behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of action verb processing. Brain and Language 2001, 78:143-168.
54. Regier T. The Human Semantic Potential: Spatial Language and Constrained Connectionism 1996, MIT Press, Cambridge.
55. Richardson D., Spivey M., McRae K., Barsalou L. Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of verbs. Cognitive Science 2003, 27:767-780.
56. Rizzolatti G., Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2004, 27:169-192.
57. Solomon K.O., Barsalou L.W. Representing properties locally. Cognitive Psychology 2001, 43:129-169.
58. Solomon K.O., Barsalou L.W. Perceptual simulation in property verification. Memory and Cognition 2004, 32:244-259.
59. Stanfield R., Zwaan R. The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Science 2001, 12:153-156.
60. Tettamanti M., Buccino G., Saccuman M.C., Gallese V., Danna M., Scifo P., Fazio F., Rizzolatti G., Cappa S.F., Perani D. Listening to action-related sentences activates fronto-parietal motor circuits. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2005, 17:273-281.
61. Tomasello M. First steps in a usage based theory of first language acquisition. Cognitive Linguistics 2000, (11):61-82.
62. Tseng, M., Hu, Y., Han, W.-W., & Bergen, B. (2005). "Searching for happiness" or "Full of joy"? Source domain activation matters. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society.
63. Wheeler M., Petersen S., Buckner R. Memory's echo: Vivid remembering reactivates sensory specific cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA 2000, 97:11125-11129.
64. Zwaan R., Stanfield R., Yaxley R. Do language comprehenders routinely represent the shapes of objects?. Psychological Science 2002, 13:168-171.