Can language restructure cognition? The case for space

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 108-114

  Majid, Asifa ^a   Bowerman, Melissa ^a   Kita, Sotaro ^b   Haun, Daniel B M ^a,c   Levinson, Stephen C ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FORMAL LANGUAGES; NEUROLOGY;

COORDINATE SYSTEMS; SPATIAL COGNITION;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS;

ATTENTION; COGNITION; COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; HUMAN; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LINGUISTICS; REVIEW; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION;

EID: 1542345554     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.01.003     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Kant I. On the first ground of the distinction of regions in space. Van Cleve J., Frederick R.E. The Philosophy of Right and Left. 1991;27-34 Kluwer.
2. Miller G.A., Johnson-Laird P.N. Language and Perception. 1976;Harvard University Press.
3. Halligan P.W., et al. Spatial cognition: evidence from visual neglect. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7:2003;125-133.
4. Wang R.F., Spelke E.S. Human spatial representation: insights from animals. Trends Cogn. Sci. 6:2002;376-382.
5. Burgess N., et al. Integrating hippocampal and parietal functions: a spatial point of view. Burgess N., Jeffery K.J. The Hippocampal and Parietal Foundations of Spatial Cognition. 1999;3-32 Oxford University Press.
6. Bickel B. Spatial operations in deixis, cognition and culture: where to orient oneself in Belhare. Nuyts J., Pederson E. Language and Conceptualization. 1997;46-83 Cambridge University Press.
7. Danziger E. Parts and their counterparts: spatial and social relationships in Mopan Maya. J. R. Anthropol. Inst. 2:1996;67-82.
8. Mishra, R.C. et al. Ecology, language and performance on spatial cognitive tasks. Int. J. Psychol. 38 (in press).
9. Haviland J.B. Anchoring, iconicity, and orientation in Guugu Yimithirr pointing gestures. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 3:1993;3-45.
10. Haviland J.B. Guugu Yimithirr cardinal directions. Ethos. 26:1998;25-47.
11. Levinson S.C. Frames of reference and Molyneux's question: cross-linguistic evidence. Bloom P., et al. Language and Space. 1996;109-169 MIT Press.
12. Levinson S.C. From outer to inner space: linguistic categories and non-linguistic thinking. Nuyts J., Pederson E. Language and Conceptualization. 1997;13-45 Cambridge University Press.
13. Levinson S.C. Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity. 2003;Cambridge University Press.
14. Neumann S., Widlok T. Rethinking some universals of spatial language using controlled comparison. Dirven R., Pütz M. The Construal of Space in Language and Thought. 1996;345-372 de Gruyter.
15. Pederson E. Language as context, language as means: spatial cognition and habitual language use. Cognitive Linguistics. 6:1995;33-62.
16. Pederson E., et al. Semantic typology and spatial conceptualization. Language. 74:1998;557-589.
17. Pederson E. How many reference frames? Freska C., et al. Spatial Cognition III: Routes and Navigation, Human Memory and Learning, Spatial Representation and Spatial Learning. 2003;287-304 Springer Verlag.
18. Senft G. Referring to Space: Studies in Austronesian and Papuan languages. 1997;Clarendon Press.
19. Senft G. Frames of reference in Kilivila. Studies in Language. 25:2001;521-555.
20. Wassmann J., Dasen P.R. Balinese spatial orientation: some empirical evidence of moderate linguistic relativity. J. R. Anthropol. Inst. 4:1998;689-711.
21. Widlok T. Orientation in the wild: the shared cognition of the Hai//om Bushpeople. J. R. Anthropol. Inst. 3:1997;317-332.
22. Levinson S.C. Vision, shape and linguistic description: Tzeltal body-part terminology and object description. Linguistics. 32:1994;791-855.
23. van der Zee E., Slack J. Representing Direction in Language and Space. 2003;Oxford University Press.
24. Roberts R.J., Aman C.J. Developmental differences in giving directions: spatial frames of reference and mental rotation. Child Dev. 64:1993;1258-1270.
25. Gallistel C.R. Language and spatial frames of reference in mind and brain. Trends Cogn. Sci. 6:2002;321-322.
26. Gallistel C.R. Conception, perception and the control of action. Reply to Majid. Trends Cogn. Sci. 6:2002;504.
27. Levinson S.C., et al. Returning the tables: language affects spatial reasoning. Cognition. 84:2002;155-188.
28. Li P., Gleitman L. Turning the tables: language and spatial reasoning. Cognition. 83:2002;265-294.
29. Bloom P., Keil F.C. Thinking through language. Mind and language. 16:2001;351-367.
30. McNeill D. Hand and Mind. 1992;Chicago University Press.
31. Kita S., Özyürek A. What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. J. Mem. Lang. 48:2003;16-32.
32. Kita, S. et al. (2001) Cultural specificity of spatial schemas as manifested in spontaneous gestures. In Spatial Schemas and Abstract Thought (Gattis, M., ed.), pp. 115-146, MIT Press.
33. Johnston, J.R. (1988) Children's verbal representation of spatial location. In Spatial Cognition (Stiles-Davies, J. et al., eds), pp. 195-206, Erlbaum.
34. Piaget, J. (1928) Judgement and Reasoning in the Child, Routledge.
35. Brown, P. and Levinson, S.C. (2000) Frames of spatial reference and their acquisition in Tenejapan Tzeltal. In Culture, Thought and Development (Nucci, L. et al., eds), pp. 167-197, Erlbaum.
36. De León L. Exploration in the acquisition of geocentric location by Tzotzil children. Linguistics. 32:1994;857-884.
37. Gumperz J.J., Levinson S.C. Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. 1996;Cambridge University Press.
38. Bowerman M., Levinson S.C. Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development. 2001;Cambridge University Press.
39. Gentner, D. and Goldin-Meadow, S. eds (2003) Language in Mind, MIT Press.
40. Lindsey D.T., Brown A.M. Color naming and the phototoxic effects of sunlight on the eye. Psychol. Sci. 13:2002;506-512.
41. Brown C.H. Where do cardinal direction terms come from? Anthropological Linguistics. 25:1983;121-161.
42. Greenfield P.M., et al. Cultural pathways through universal development. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 54:2003;461-490.
43. Lucy, J.A. Language, culture and mind. In Language, Culture and Mind (Achard, M. and Kemmer, S., eds), CSLI Publications (in press).
44. Goldstone R.L. Perceptual learning. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 49:1998;585-612.
45. Sloutsky V.M. The role of similarity in the development of categorization. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7:2003;246-251.
46. Werker J.F., Tees R.C. Influences on infant speech processing: toward a new synthesis. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 50:1999;509-535.
47. McDonough L., et al. Understanding spatial relations: flexible infants, lexical adults. Cogn. Psychol. 46:2003;229-259.
48. Smith L.B., et al. Object name learning provides on-the-job training for attention. Psychol. Sci. 13:2002;13-19.
49. Bailenson J.N., et al. A bird's eye view: biological categorization and reasoning within and across cultures. Cognition. 84:2002;1-53.
50. Ross N., et al. Cultural and experiential differences in the development of folkbiological induction. Cogn. Dev. 18:2003;25-47.
51. Miller G.A. The magical number 7, plus or minus 2: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol. Rev. 63:1956;81-97.
52. Davidoff J. Language and perceptual categorisation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 5:2001;382-387.
53. Bowerman, M. and Choi, S. (2003) Space under construction: language-specific spatial categorization in first language acquisition. In Language in Mind (Gentner, D. and Goldin-Meadow, S., eds), pp. 387-427, MIT Press.
54. Karmiloff-Smith A. Beyond Modularity: a Developmental Perspective on Cognitive Science. 1992;MIT Press.
55. Gentner, D. (2003) Why we're so smart. In Language in Mind (Gentner, D. and Goldin-Meadow, S., eds), pp. 195-235, MIT Press.
56. Lucy, J.A. and Gaskins, S. (2001) Grammatical categories and the development of classification preferences: a comparative approach. In Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development (Bowerman, M. and Levinson, S.C., eds), pp. 257-283, Cambridge University Press.
57. Boroditsky, L. et al. (2003) Sex, syntax and semantics. In Language in Mind (Gentner, D. and Goldin-Meadow, S., eds), pp. 61-79, MIT Press.
58. Boroditsky L. Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers' conceptions of time. Cogn. Psychol. 43:2001;1-22.
59. Hunt E., Agnoli F. The Whorfian hypothesis: a cognitive psychology perspective. Psychol. Rev. 98:1991;377-389.
60. Kita, S. (2003) Interplay of gaze, hand, torso orientation, and language in pointing. In Pointing: Where Language, Culture, and Cognition Meet (Kita, S., ed.), pp. 293-306, Erlbaum.