Effects of different mating scenarios on embryo viability in brown trout

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 19, Issue 23, 2010, Pages 5296-5307

  Jacob, Alain ^a   Evanno, Guillaume ^a,b,c   Von Siebenthal, Beat A ^a   Grossen, Christine ^a   Wedekind, Claus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^b Ecology and Ecosystem Health   (France)

^c AGROCAMPUS OUEST   (France)

Author keywords

compatible genes; good genes; major histocompatibility complex; melanin based colours; pathogen resistance; Salmonid

Indexed keywords

MELANIN;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BODY SIZE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DNA SEQUENCE; FEMALE; GENETICS; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX; MALE; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT; REPRODUCTION; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; STATISTICAL MODEL; TROUT;

ANIMALS; BODY SIZE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; GENETIC FITNESS; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX; MALE; MELANINS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; REPRODUCTION; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL; TROUT;

SALMO TRUTTA; SALMONIDAE;

EID: 78649577683     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: 1365294X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04884.x     Document Type: Article

References (106)

1. Agbali M, Reichard M, Bryjova A, Bryja J, Smith C, (2010) Mate choice for nonadditive genetic benefits correlate with MHC dissimilarity in the rose bitterling (Rhodeus ocellatus). Evolution, 64, 1683-1696.
2. Agrawal AF, Whitlock MC, (2010) Environmental duress and epistasis: how does stress affect the strength of selection on new mutations? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25, 450-458.
3. Andersson M, (1994) Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
4. Arkush KD, Giese AR, Mendonca HL, McBride AM, Marty GD, Hedrick PW, (2002) Resistance to three pathogens in the endangered winter-run chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha): effects of inbreeding and major histocompatibility complex genotypes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 59, 966-975.
5. Badyaev AV, Young RL, (2004) Complexity and integration in sexual ornamentation: an example with carotenoid and melanin plumage pigmentation. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 17, 1317-1327.
6. Baquero F, Nombela C, Cassell GH, Gutiérrez-Fuentes JA, (Editors) (2008) Evolutionary Biology of Bacterial and Fungal Pathogens. ASM Press, Washington DC.
7. Bates DM, (2005) Fitting linear mixed models in R. R News, 5, 27-30.
8. Blanc JM, (2005) Contribution of genetic and environmental variance components to increasing body length in juvenile brown trout Salmo trutta. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, 36, 51-58.
9. Bos DH, Williams RN, Gopurenko D, Bulut Z, Dewoody JA, (2009) Condition-dependent mate choice and a reproductive disadvantage for MHC-divergent male tiger salamanders. Molecular Ecology, 18, 3307-3315.
10. Bradford MJ, (1995) Comparative review of Pacific salmon survival rates. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 52, 1327-1338.
11. Bussière LF, Hunt J, Stolting KN, Jennions MD, Brooks R, (2008) Mate choice for genetic quality when environments vary: suggestions for empirical progress. Genetica, 134, 69-78.
12. Campos JL, Posada D, Moran P, (2006) Genetic variation at MHC, mitochondrial and microsatellite loci in isolated populations of Brown trout (Salmo trutta). Conservation Genetics, 7, 515-530.
13. Casalini M, Agbali M, Reichard M, Konecna M, Bryjova A, Smith C, (2009) Male dominance, female mate choice, and intersexual conflict in the rose bitterling (Rhodeus ocellatus). Evolution, 63, 366-376.
14. Colegrave N, Kotiaho JS, Tomkins JL, (2002) Mate choice or polyandry: reconciling genetic compatibility and good genes sexual selection. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 4, 911-917.
15. Consuegra S, De Leaniz CG, (2008) MHC-mediated mate choice increases parasite resistance in salmon. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 275, 1397-1403.
16. Cornwallis CK, Uller T, (2010) Towards an evolutionary ecology of sexual traits. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25, 145-152.
17. Dickerson BR, Brinck KW, Willson MF, Bentzen P, Quinn TP, (2005) Relative importance of salmon body size and arrival time at breeding grounds to reproductive success. Ecology, 86, 347-352.
18. Diggle SP, Griffin AS, Campbell GS, West SA, (2007) Cooperation and conflict in quorum-sensing bacterial populations. Nature, 450, 411-414.
19. Ducrest AL, Keller L, Roulin A, (2008) Pleiotropy in the melanocortin system, coloration and behavioural syndromes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 23, 502-510.
20. Eizaguirre C, Yeates SE, Lenz TL, Kalbe M, Milinski M, (2009) MHC-based mate choice combines good genes and maintenance of MHC polymorphism. Molecular Ecology, 18, 3316-3329.
21. Elliott JM, (1994) Quantitative Ecology and the Brown Trout. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
22. Ellis AE, (1977) of the immune system in Salmo salar. Histeogenesis of the lymphoid organs and appearance of membrane immunoglobulin and mixed leucocyte reactivity. In: Developmental Immunology (eds, Solomon JB, Hj D,), pp. 38-80. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
23. Esteve M, (2005) Observations of spawning behaviour in Salmoninae: Salmo, Oncorhynchus and Salvelinus. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 15, 1-21.
24. Evans ML, Neff BD, (2009) Major histocompatibility complex heterozygote advantage and widespread bacterial infections in populations of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Molecular Ecology, 18, 4716-4729.
25. Evans ML, Neff BD, Heath DD, (2010) Quantitative genetic and translocation experiments reveal genotype-by-environment effects on juvenile life-history traits in two populations of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 23, 687-698.
26. Fischer U, Dijkstra JM, Kollner B, et al. (2005) The ontogeny of MHC class I expression in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Fish & Shellfish Immunology, 18, 49-60.
27. Fleming IA, Reynolds JD, (2004) Salmonid breeding system. In: Evolution Illuminated: Salmon and their Relatives (eds, Hendry AP, Stearns SC,), pp. 264-294. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
28. Forsberg LA, Dannewitz J, Petersson E, Grahn M, (2007) Influence of genetic dissimilarity in the reproductive success and mate choice of brown trout-females fishing for optimal MHC dissimilarity. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 20, 1859-1869.
29. Garant D, Dodson JD, Bernatchez L, (2005) Offspring genetic diversity increases fitness of female Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 57, 240-244.
30. Garner SR, Bortoluzzi RN, Heath DD, Neff BD, (2010) Sexual conflict inhibits female mate choice for major histocompat-ibility complex dissimilarity in Chinook salmon. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 277, 885-894.
31. Gillingham MAF, Richardson DS, Lovlie H, Moynihan A, Worley K, Pizzari T, (2009) Cryptic preference for MHC-dissimilar females in male red junglefowl, Gallus gallus. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 276, 1083-1092.
32. Goudet J, (1995) FSTAT (Version 1.2): A computer program to calculate F-statistics. Journal of Heredity, 86, 485-486.
33. Grafen A, (1990) Biological signals as handicaps. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 144, 517-546.
34. Grahn M, Langesfors Å, Von Schantz T, (1998) The importance of mate choice in improving viability in captive populations. In: Behavioral Ecology and Conservation Biology (ed., Caro TM,), pp. 341-363. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
35. Grimholt U, Larsen S, Nordmo R, et al. (2003) MHC polymorphism and disease resistance in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar); facing pathogens with single expressed major histocompatibility class I and class II loci. Immunogenetics, 55, 210-219.
36. Hamilton WD, Zuk M, (1982) Heritable true fitness and bright birds-a role for parasites. Science, 218, 384-387.
37. Hettyey A, Hegyi G, Puurtinen M, Hoi H, Torok J, Penn DJ, (2010) Mate choice for genetic benefits: time to put the pieces together. Ethology, 116, 1-9.
38. Higginson AD, Reader T, (2009) Environmental heterogeneity, genotype-by-environment interactions and the reliability of sexual traits as indicators of mate quality. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 276, 1153-1159.
39. Hoffmann AA, Merilä J, (1999) Heritable variation and evolution under favourable and unfavourable conditions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14, 96-101.
40. Hordvik I, Grimholt U, Fosse VM, Lie O, Endresen C, (1993) Cloning and sequence-analysis of cDNAs encoding the MHC class-II beta chain in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Immunogenetics, 37, 437-441.
41. Hunter JE, Schmidt FL, (2004) Methods of Meta-Analysis, Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks.
42. Huntingford FA, Turner AM, (1987) Animal Conflict. Chapman & Hall, London.
43. Jacob A, Nusslé S, Britschgi A, Evanno G, Müller R, Wedekind C, (2007) Male dominance linked to size and age, but not to 'good genes' in brown trout (Salmo trutta). BMC Evolutionary Biology, 71, 207.
44. Jacob A, Evanno G, Renai E, Sermier R, Wedekind C, (2009) Male body size and breeding tubercles are both linked to intra-sexual dominance and reproductive success in the minnow. Animal Behaviour, 77, 823-829.
45. Kalbe M, Eizaguirre C, Dankert I, et al. (2009) Lifetime reproductive success is maximized with optimal major histocompatibility complex diversity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 276, 925-934.
46. Kekäläinen J, Vallunen JA, Primmer CR, Rattya J, Taskinen J, (2009) Signals of major histocompatibility complex over-dominance in a wild salmonid population. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 276, 3133-3140.
47. Keller LF, Waller DM, (2002) Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17, 230-241.
48. Kjoglum S, Larsen S, Bakke HG, Grimholt U, (2008) The effect of specific MHC class I and class II combinations on resistance to furunculosis in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, 67, 160-168.
49. Klein J, (1986) Natural History of the Major Histocompatibility Complex. Wiley and Sons, New York.
50. Kodric-Brown A, (1998) Sexual dichromatism and temporary color changes in the reproduction of fishes. American Zoologist, 38, 70-81. (Pubitemid 128058924)
51. Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M, (2004) MEGA3: integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 5, 150-163.
52. Labonne J, Augery M, Parade M, et al. (2009) Female preference for male body size in brown trout, Salmo trutta: is big still fashionable? Animal Behaviour, 77, 129-137.
53. Landry C, Bernatchez L, (2001) Comparative analysis of population structure across environments and geographical scales at major histocompatibility complex and microsatellite loci in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Molecular Ecology, 10, 2525-2539.
54. Landry C, Garant D, Duchesne P, Bernatchez L, (2001) 'Good genes as heterozygosity': the major histocompatibility complex and mate choice in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 268, 1279-1285.
55. Lenz TL, Eizaguirre C, Scharsack JP, Kalbe M, Milinski M, (2009) Disentangling the role of MHC-dependent 'good genes' and 'compatible genes' in mate-choice decisions of three-spined sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus under semi-natural conditions. Journal of Fish Biology, 75, 2122-2142.
56. Lohm J, Grahn M, Langefors Å, Andersen AØ, Storset A, Von Schantz T, (2002) Experimental evidence for major histocompatibility complex-allele-specific resistance to a bacterial infection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 269, 2029-2033.
57. Lynch M, Walsh B, (1998) Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates Inc, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
58. McGraw KJ, (2005) The antioxidant function of many animal pigments: are there consistent health benefits of sexually selected colourants? Animal Behaviour, 69, 757-764.
59. Milinski M, Bakker TCM, (1990) Female sticklebacks use male coloration in mate choice and hence avoid parasitized males. Nature, 344, 330-333.
60. Milinski M, Griffiths SW, Reusch TBH, Boehm T, (2010) Costly major histocompatibility complex signals produced only by reproductively active males, but not females, must be validated by a 'maleness signal' in three-spined sticklebacks. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 277, 391-398.
61. Miller CW, Moore AJ, (2007) A potential resolution to the lek paradox through indirect genetic effects. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 274, 1279-1286.
62. Miller HC, Moore JA, Nelson NJ, Daugherty CH, (2009) Influence of major histocompatibility complex genotype on mating success in a free-ranging reptile population. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 276, 1695-1704.
63. Neff BD, Pitcher TE, (2005) Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes. Molecular Ecology, 14, 19-38.
64. Neff BD, Garner SR, Heath JW, Heath D, (2008) The MHC and non-random mating in a captive population of Chinook salmon. Heredity, 101, 175-185.
65. Ober C, Weitkamp LR, Cox N, Dytch H, Kostyu D, Elias S, (1997) HLA and mate choice in humans. American Journal of Human Genetics, 61, 497-504.
66. OECD 1992 OECD guideline for the testing of chemicals 203 (fish acute toxicity test), Annex 2. 9., pp.
67. Olsen KH, Grahn M, Lohm J, Langefors A, (1998) MHC and kin discrimination in juvenile Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus (L.). Animal Behaviour, 56, 319-327.
68. Petersson E, Jarvi T, (2007) Characteristics of brown trout males influence growth and survival of their offspring. Journal of Fish Biology, 71, 493-509.
69. Pitcher TE, Mays HL, (2008) An introduction to genetic quality in the context of sexual selection. Genetica, 134, 1-4.
70. Pitcher TE, Neff BD, (2006) MHC class IIB alleles contribute to both additive and nonadditive genetic effects on survival in Chinook salmon. Molecular Ecology, 15, 2357-2365.
71. Pitcher TE, Neff BD, (2007) Genetic quality and offspring performance in Chinook salmon: implications for supportive breeding. Conservation Genetics, 8, 607-616.
72. Potts WK, Manning CJ, Wakeland EK, (1991) Mating patterns in seminatural populations of mice influenced by MHC genotype. Nature, 352, 619-621.
73. Puurtinen M, Ketola T, Kotiaho JS, (2009) The good-genes and compatible-genes benefits of mate choice. American Naturalist, 174, 741-752.
74. Qvarnstrom A, Forsgren E, (1998) Should females prefer dominant males? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 13, 498-501.
75. R Development Core Team 2006 R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing;, Vienna, Austria.
76. Roberts SC, (2009) Complexity and context of MHC-correlated mating preferences in wild populations. Molecular Ecology, 18, 3121-3123.
77. Roberts SC, Gosling LM, (2003) Genetic similarity and quality interact in mate choice decisions by female mice. Nature Genetics, 35, 103-106.
78. Roulin A, (2004) The evolution, maintenance and adaptive function of genetic colour polymorphism in bird. Biological Reviews, 79, 1-34.
79. Sgro CM, Hoffmann AA, (2004) Genetic correlations, tradeoffs and environmental variation. Heredity, 93, 241-248.
80. Von Siebenthal BA, Jacob A, Wedekind C, (2009) Tolerance of whitefish embryos to Pseudomonas fluorescens linked to genetic and maternal effects, and reduced by previous exposure. Fish & Shellfish Immunology, 26, 531-535.
81. Slade RW, McCallum HI, (1992) Overdominant vs. frequency-dependent selection at MHC loci. Genetics, 132, 861-862.
82. Spurgin LG, Richardson DS, (2010) How pathogens drive genetic diversity: MHC, mechanisms and misunderstandings. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 277, 979-988.
83. Sugimoto M, (2002) Morphological color changes in fish: regulation of pigment cell density and morphology. Microscopy Research and Techniques, 58, 496-503.
84. Takahata N, Nei M, (1990) Allelic genealogy under over-dominant and frequency-dependent selection and poly-morphism of major histocompatibility complex loci. Genetics, 124, 967-978.
85. Theriault V, Garant D, Bernatchez L, Dodson JJ, (2007) Heritability of life-history tactics and genetic correlation with body size in a natural population of brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis). Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 20, 2266-2277.
86. Tregenza T, Wedell N, (2000) Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: invited review. Molecular Ecology, 9, 1013-1027.
87. Turner SM, Faisal M, DeWoody JA, (2007) Zygosity at the major histocompatibility class IIB locus predicts susceptibility to Renibacterium salmoninarum in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Animal Genetics, 38, 517-519.
88. Turner SM, Chaves-Campos J, DeWoody JA, (2009) Parental relatedness and major histocompatibility effects on early embryo survivorship in Atlantic salmon. Genetica, 137, 99-109.
89. Vøllestad LA, Lillehammer T, (2000) Individual variation in early life-history traits in brown trout. Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 9, 242-247.
90. Wedekind C, (2002a) Sexual selection and life-history decisions: implications for supportive breeding and the management of captive populations. Conservation Biology, 16, 1204-1211.
91. Wedekind C, (2002b) Induced hatching to avoid infectious egg disease in whitefish. Current Biology, 12, 69-71.
92. Wedekind C, Füri S, (1997) Body odour preferences in men and women: do they aim for specific MHC combinations or simply heterozygosity? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 264, 1471-1479.
93. Wedekind C, Müller R, (2004) Parental characteristics versus egg survival: towards an improved genetic management in the supportive breeding of lake whitefish. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 41, 105-115.
94. Wedekind C, Müller R, Spicher H, (2001) Potential genetic benefits of mate selection in whitefish. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 14, 980-986.
95. Wedekind C, Walker M, Portmann J, Cenni B, Müller R, Binz T, (2004) MHC-linked susceptibility to a bacterial infection, but no MHC- linked cryptic female choice in whitefish. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 17, 11-18.
96. Wedekind C, Walker M, Little TJ, (2005) The course of malaria in mice: major histocompatibility complex (MHC) effects, but no general MHC heterozygote advantage in single-strain infections. Genetics, 170, 1427-1430.
97. Wedekind C, Rudolfsen G, Jacob A, Urbach D, Müller R, (2007) The genetic consequences of hatchery-induced sperm competition in a salmonid. Biological Conservation, 137, 180-188.
98. Wedekind C, Evanno G, Urbach D, Jacob A, Müller R, (2008a) 'Good-genes' and 'compatible-genes' effects in an Alpine whitefish and the information content of breeding tubercles over the course of the spawning season. Genetica, 132, 199-208.
99. Wedekind C, Jacob A, Evanno G, Nusslé S, Müller R, (2008b) Viability of brown trout embryos positively linked to melanin-based but negatively to carotenoid-based colours of their fathers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 275, 1737-1744.
100. Wedekind C, Gessner MO, Vazquez F, Maerki M, Steiner D, (2010) Elevated resource availability sufficient to turn opportunistic into virulent fish pathogens. Ecology, 91, 1251-1256.
101. Wegner KM, (2008) Historical and contemporary selection of teleost MHC genes: did we leave the past behind? Journal of Fish Biology, 73, 2110-2132.
102. Welch AM, (2003) Genetic benefits of a female mating preference in gray tree frogs are context-dependent. Evolution, 57, 883-893.
103. Wong BBM, Candolin U, (2005) How is female mate choice affected by male competition? Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 80, 559-571.
104. Yamazaki K, Boyse EA, Mike V, et al. (1976) Control of mating preference in mice by genes in the major histocompatibility complex. Journal of Experimental Medicine, 144, 1324-1335.
105. Yeates SE, Einum S, Fleming IA, et al. (2009) Atlantic salmon eggs favour sperm in competition that have similar major histocompatibility alleles. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 276, 559-566.
106. Zeh JA, Zeh DW, (1996) The evolution of polyandry I: intragenomic conflict and genetic incompatibility. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 263, 1711-1717.