Parental characteristics versus egg survival: Towards an improved genetic management in the supportive breeding of lake whitefish

Annales Zoologici Fennici

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 105-115

  Wedekind, Claus ^a,b   Müller, Rudolf ^a  

^a SWISS FEDERAL INSTITUTE OF AQUATIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EGG; FISH CULTURE; GENETIC VARIATION; GOOD GENES HYPOTHESIS; SALMONID; SELECTIVE BREEDING; SURVIVAL;

ANIMALIA; COREGONUS; COREGONUS CLUPEAFORMIS; SALMONIDAE;

EID: 1542440405     PISSN: 0003455X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Andersson, M. 1994: Sexual selection. - Princeton University Press, Princeton.
2. Bolger, T. & Connoly, P. L. 1989: The selection of suitable indices for the measurement and analysis of fish condition. - J. Fish Biol. 34: 171-182.
3. Boudry, P., Collet, B., Cornette, F., Hervouet, V. & Bonhomme, F. 2002: High variance in reproductive success of the Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas Thunberg) revealed by microsatellite-based parentage analysis of multifactorial crosses. - Aquaculture 204: 283-296.
4. Bromage, N., Jones, J., Randall, C., Thrush, M., Davies, B., Springate, J., Duston, J. & Barker, G. 1992: Broodstock management, fecundity, egg quality and timing of egg production in the rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). - Aquaculture 100: 141-166.
5. Da̧browski, K., Łuczynski, M., Czeczuga, B. & Falkowski, S. 1987: Relationship among coregonid fish reproductive effort, carotenoid content in the eggs and survivial of embryos. - Archiv für Hydrobiologie, Suppl. 79 (Monographische Beiträge) 1: 29-48.
6. Duchesne, P. & Bernatchez, L. 2002: An analytical investigation of the dynamics of inbreeding in multi-generation supportive breeding. - Conserv. Genet. 3: 47-60.
7. Ebert, D. 1998: Experimental evolution of parasites. - Science 282: 1432-1435.
8. Frankham, R. 1995: Conservation genetics. - Ann. Rev. Genet. 29: 305-327.
9. Grahn, M., Langesfors, Å. & von Schantz, T. 1998: The importance of mate choice in improving viability in captive populations. - In: Caro, T. M. (ed.), Behavioral ecology and conservation Biology: 341-363. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
10. Hamilton, W. D. & Zuk, M. 1982: Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? - Science 218: 384-387.
11. Hartl, D. L. 1988: A primer of population genetics, second edition. - Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts.
12. Jennions, M. D. & Petrie, M. 2000: Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. - Biol. Rev. 75: 21-64.
13. Lande, R. 1998: Anthropogenic, ecological and genetic factors in extinction. - In: Mace, G. M., Balmford, A. & Ginsberg, J. R. (eds.), Conservation in a changing world: 29-51. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
14. Møller, A. P. & Alatalo, R. V. 1999: Good-genes effects in sexual selection. - Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266: 85-91.
15. Møller, A. P. & Swaddle, J. P. 1997: Asymmetry, developmental stability, and evolution. - Oxford University Press, Oxford.
16. Møller, A. P. & Thornhill, R. 1998: Bilateral symmetry and sexual selection: A meta-analysis. - Am. Nat. 151: 174-192.
17. Nagler, J. J., Parsons, J. E. & Cloud, J. G. 2000: Single pair mating indicated maternal effects on embryo survival in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. - Aquaculture 184: 177-183.
18. Rieman, B. E. & Allendorf, F. W. 2001: Effective population size and genetic conservation criteria for bull trout. - North Am. J. Fish Managem. 21: 756-764.
19. Rojas-Beltran, R. & Gillet, C. 1995: The quality of eggs and larvae of whitefish Coregomis lavaretus L. from Lake Léman: effect of female origin. - Arch. Hydrobiol. Spec. Issues Advanc. Limnol. 46: 309-314.
20. Ryman, N., Jorde, P. E. & Laikre, L. 1999: Supportive breeding and inbreeding effective number: Reply to Nomura. - Conserv. Biol. 13: 673-676.
21. Ryman, N. & Laikre, L. 1991: Effects of supportive breeding on the genetically effective population size. - Conserv. Biol. 5: 325-329.
22. Ventling-Schwank, A. R. & Müller, R. 1991: Survival of coregonid (Coregonus sp.) eggs in Lake Sempach, Switzerland. - Verh. Int. Verein. Limnol. 24: 2451-2554.
23. Wang, J. L. & Caballero, A. 1999: Developments in predicting the effective size of subdivided populations. - Heredity 82: 212-226.
24. Wang, J. L. & Hill, W. G. 2000: Marker-assisted selection to increase effective population size by reducing Mendelian segregation variance. - Genetics 154: 475-489.
25. Wang, J. L. & Ryman, N. 2001: Genetic effects of multiple generations of supportive breeding. - Conserv. Biol. 15: 1619-1631.
26. Waples, R. S. 2002a: Effective size of fluctuating salmon populations. - Genetics 161: 783-791.
27. Waples, R. S. 2002b: Evaluating the effect of stage-specific survivorship on the N-e/N ratio. - Molec. Ecol. 11: 1029-1037.
28. Wedekind, C. 1992: Detailed information about parasites revealed by sexual ornamentation. - Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 247: 169-174.
29. Wedekind, C. 2002a: Sexual selection and life-history decisions: implications for supportive breeding and the management of captive populations. - Conserv. Biol. 16: 1204-1211.
30. Wedekind, C. 2002b: Induced hatching to avoid infectious egg disease in whitefish. - Curr. Biol. 12: 69-71.
31. Wedekind, C., Müller, R. & Spicher, H. 2001: Potential genetic benefits of mate selection in whitefish. - J. Evol. Biol. 14: 980-986.
32. Westneat, D. F. & Birkhead, T. R. 1998: Alternative hypotheses linking the immune system and mate choice for good genes. - Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265: 1065-1073.
33. Wiley, M. L. & Collette, B. B. 1970: Breeding tubercles and contact organs in fishes: their occurance, structure, and significance. - Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 143: 145-216.
34. Wright, S. 1969: Evolution and the genetics of populations. Vol. II: The theory of gene frequencies. - University of Chicago Press, Chicago.