Computational and mutagenesis studies of the streptavidin native dimer interface

Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 295-308

  Hsu, Cheng Kuo ^a   Park, Sheldon ^a  

^a the State University of New York   (United States)

Author keywords

Knob into hole interaction; Molecular dynamics simulation; Quaternary structure; Solvent accessible surface area; Streptavidin

Indexed keywords

HOLE INTERACTIONS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; QUATERNARY STRUCTURE; SOLVENT ACCESSIBLE SURFACE AREA; STREPTAVIDIN;

ASSOCIATION REACTIONS; BINDING ENERGY; COENZYMES; DIMERS; KNOBS; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; RATIONAL FUNCTIONS; SURFACE STRUCTURE;

MOLECULAR DYNAMICS;

BIOTIN; DIMER; STREPTAVIDIN;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIMERIZATION; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MUTAGENESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN QUATERNARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STABILITY;

BINDING SITES; BIOTIN; DIMERIZATION; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; MUTAGENESIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, QUATERNARY; STREPTAVIDIN;

EID: 78649512878     PISSN: 10933263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2010.09.009     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Hendrickson W.A., Pahler A., Smith J.L., Satow Y., Merritt E.A., Phizackerley R.P. Crystal structure of core streptavidin determined from multiwavelength anomalous diffraction of synchrotron radiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1989, 86:2190-2194.
2. Weber P.C., Ohlendorf D.H., Wendoloski J.J., Salemme F.R. Structural origins of high-affinity biotin binding to streptavidin. Science 1989, 243:85-88.
3. Freitag S., Le Trong I., Chilkoti A., Klumb L.A., Stayton P.S., Stenkamp R.E. Structural studies of binding site tryptophan mutants in the high-affinity streptavidin-biotin complex. J. Mol. Biol. 1998, 279:211-221.
4. Sano T., Cantor C.R. Intersubunit contacts made by tryptophan 120 with biotin are essential for both strong biotin binding and biotin-induced tighter subunit association of streptavidin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1995, 92:3180-3184.
5. Chilkoti A., Tan P.H., Stayton P.S. Site-directed mutagenesis studies of the high-affinity streptavidin-biotin complex: contributions of tryptophan residues 79, 108, and 120. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1995, 92:1754-1758.
6. Laitinen O.H., Airenne K.J., Marttila A.T., Kulik T., Porkka E., Bayer E.A., et al. Mutation of a critical tryptophan to lysine in avidin or streptavidin may explain why sea urchin fibropellin adopts an avidin-like domain. FEBS Lett. 1999, 461:52-58.
7. Sano T., Vajda S., Smith C.L., Cantor C.R. Engineering subunit association of multisubunit proteins: a dimeric streptavidin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1997, 94:6153-6158.
8. Gonzalez M., Argarana C.E., Fidelio G.D. Extremely high thermal stability of streptavidin and avidin upon biotin binding. Biomol. Eng. 1999, 16:67-72.
9. Gonzalez M., Bagatolli L.A., Echabe I., Arrondo J.L., Argarana C.E., Cantor C.R., et al. Interaction of biotin with streptavidin thermostability and conformational changes upon binding. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272:11288-11294.
10. Aslan F.M., Yu Y., Mohr S.C., Cantor C.R. Engineered single-chain dimeric streptavidins with an unexpected strong preference for biotin-4-fluorescein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102:8507-8512.
11. Wu S.C., Wong S.L. Engineering soluble monomeric streptavidin with reversible biotin binding capability. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280:23225-23231.
12. Katz B.A. Binding of biotin to streptavidin stabilizes intersubunit salt bridges between Asp61 and His87 at low pH. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 274:776-800.
13. Katz B.A., Cass R.T. In crystals of complexes of streptavidin with peptide ligands containing the HPQ sequence the pKa of the peptide histidine is less than 3.0. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272:13220-13228.
14. Karplus M., McCammon J.A. Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2002, 9:646-652.
15. MacKerell A.D., Bashford D., Bellott M., Dunbrack R.L., Evanseck J.D., Field M.J., et al. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102:3586-3616.
16. Chennamsetty N., Voynov V., Kayser V., Helk B., Trout B.L. Design of therapeutic proteins with enhanced stability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:11937-11942.
17. Szep S., Park S., Boder E.T., Van Duyne G.D., Saven J.G. Structural coupling between FKBP12 and buried water. Proteins 2009, 74:603-611.
18. Park S., Saven J.G. Statistical and molecular dynamics studies of buried waters in globular proteins. Proteins 2005, 60:450-463.
19. Hubbard R.E., Thornton J.M. NACCESS 1993, University College London, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, p. Computer Program.
20. Lo Conte L., Chothia C., Janin J. The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 285:2177-2198.
21. Kale L., Skeel R., Bhandarkar M., Brunner R., Gursoy A., Krawetz N., et al. NAMD2: Greater scalability for parallel molecular dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 1999, 151:283-312.
22. Humphrey W., Dalke A., Schulten K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 1996, 14:33-38.
23. Chong L.T., Pitera J.W., Swope W.C., Pande V.S. Comparison of computational approaches for predicting the effects of missense mutations on p53 function. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 2009, 27:978-982.
24. Baker N.A., Sept D., Joseph S., Holst M.J., McCammon J.A. Electrostatics of nanosystems: application to microtubules and the ribosome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001, 98:10037-10041.
25. Massova I., Kollman P.A. Computational alanine scanning to probe protein-protein interactions: a novel approach to evaluate binding free energies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121:8133-8143.
26. Howarth M., Chinnapen D.J., Gerrow K., Dorrestein P.C., Grandy M.R., Kelleher N.L., et al. A monovalent streptavidin with a single femtomolar biotin binding site. Nat. Methods 2006, 3:267-273.
27. Becktel W.J., Schellman J.A. Protein stability curves. Biopolymers 1987, 26:1859-1877.
28. Myers J.K., Pace C.N., Scholtz J.M. Denaturant m values and heat capacity changes: relation to changes in accessible surface areas of protein unfolding. Protein Sci. 1995, 4:2138-2148.
29. Kada G., Falk H., Gruber H.J. Accurate measurement of avidin and streptavidin in crude biofluids with a new, optimized biotin-fluorescein conjugate. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1999, 1427:33-43.
30. Kada G., Kaiser K., Falk H., Gruber H.J. Rapid estimation of avidin and streptavidin by fluorescence quenching or fluorescence polarization. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1999, 1427:44-48.
31. Bogan A.A., Thorn K.S. Anatomy of hot spots in protein interfaces. J. Mol. Biol. 1998, 280:1-9.
32. Chakrabarti P., Janin J. Dissecting protein-protein recognition sites. Proteins 2002, 47:334-343.
33. Clackson T., Wells J.A. A hot spot of binding energy in a hormone-receptor interface. Science 1995, 267:383-386.
34. Kajander T., Kahn P.C., Passila S.H., Cohen D.C., Lehtio L., Adolfsen W., et al. Buried charged surface in proteins. Structure 2000, 8:1203-1214.
35. Pace C.N. Polar group burial contributes more to protein stability than nonpolar group burial. Biochemistry 2001, 40:310-313.
36. Takano K., Scholtz J.M., Sacchettini J.C., Pace C.N. The contribution of polar group burial to protein stability is strongly context-dependent. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278:31790-31795.
37. Pace C.N. Energetics of protein hydrogen bonds. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2009, 16:681-682.
38. Gebremichael Y., Chu J.W., Voth G.A. Intrinsic bending and structural rearrangement of tubulin dimer: molecular dynamics simulations and coarse-grained analysis. Biophys. J. 2008, 95:2487-2499.
39. Lopez C.F., Nielsen S.O., Srinivas G., Degrado W.F., Klein M.L. Probing membrane insertion activity of antimicrobial polymers via coarse-grain molecular dynamics. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2006, 2:649-655.
40. Perlmutter J.D., Sachs J.N. Experimental verification of lipid bilayer structure through multi-scale modeling. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2009, 1788:2284-2290.
41. Crick F. The packing of [alpha]-helices: simple coiled-coils. Acta Crystallogr. 1953, 6:689-697.
42. Fischer T.B., Holmes J.B., Miller I.R., Parsons J.R., Tung L., Hu J.C., et al. Assessing methods for identifying pair-wise atomic contacts across binding interfaces. J. Struct. Biol. 2006, 153:103-112.
43. Litvinov R.I., Gorkun O.V., Owen S.F., Shuman H., Weisel J.W. Polymerization of fibrin: specificity, strength, and stability of knob-hole interactions studied at the single-molecule level. Blood 2005, 106:2944-2951.
44. Sammond D.W., Eletr Z.M., Purbeck C., Kuhlman B. Computational design of second-site suppressor mutations at protein-protein interfaces. Proteins 2010, 78:1055-1065.
45. Creighton T.E. Proteins Structure and Molecular Properties 1993, W.H. Freeman and Company, New York. Second ed.
46. Humphris E.L., Kortemme T. Prediction of protein-protein interface sequence diversity using flexible backbone computational protein design. Structure 2008, 16:1777-1788.
47. Miyamoto S., Kollman P.A. Absolute and relative binding free energy calculations of the interaction of biotin and its analogs with streptavidin using molecular dynamics/free energy perturbation approaches. Proteins 1993, 16:226-245.
48. Sreerama N., Woody R.W. Computation and analysis of protein circular dichroism spectra. Methods Enzymol. 2004, 383:318-351.
49. John D.M., Weeks K.M. van't Hoff enthalpies without baselines. Protein Sci. 2000, 9:1416-1419.
50. Waner M.J., Mascotti D.P. A simple spectrophotometric streptavidin-biotin binding assay utilizing biotin-4-fluorescein. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 2008, 70:873-877.
51. Green N.M. Avidin and streptavidin. Methods Enzymol. 1990, 184:51-67.
52. Marshall S.A., Mayo S.L. Achieving stability and conformational specificity in designed proteins via binary patterning. J. Mol. Biol. 2001, 305:619-631.
53. Moreira I.S., Fernandes P.A., Ramos M.J. Computational alanine scanning mutagenesis-an improved methodological approach. J. Comput. Chem. 2007, 28:644-654.
54. Waldburger C.D., Schildbach J.F., Sauer R.T. Are buried salt bridges important for protein stability and conformational specificity?. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1995, 2:122-128.
55. Loladze V.V., Ermolenko D.N., Makhatadze G.I. Thermodynamic consequences of burial of polar and non-polar amino acid residues in the protein interior. J. Mol. Biol. 2002, 320:343-357.
56. Kabsch W., Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 1983, 22:2577-2637.
57. Rucker A.L., Creamer T.P. Polyproline II helical structure in protein unfolded states: lysine peptides revisited. Protein Sci. 2002, 11:980-985.
58. Kelly M.A., Chellgren B.W., Rucker A.L., Troutman J.M., Fried M.G., Miller A.F., et al. Host-guest study of left-handed polyproline II helix formation. Biochemistry 2001, 40:14376-14383.
59. Toumadje A., Johnson W.C. Systemin has the characteristics of a poly(l-Proline)-II type helix. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117:7023-7024.
60. Sano T., Cantor C.R. Cooperative biotin binding by streptavidin electrophoretic behavior and subunit association of streptavidin in the presence of 6M urea. J. Biol. Chem. 1990, 265:3369-3373.
61. Jones M.L., Kurzban G.P. Noncooperativity of biotin binding to tetrameric streptavidin. Biochemistry 1995, 34:11750-11756.