New elastographic classification of breast lesions during and after compression

Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 96-103

  de Faria Castro Fleury, Eduardo ^a   Fleury, Jose Carlos Vendramini ^b   Piato, Sebastiao ^a   Roveda Jr , Decio ^a  

^a Department of Radiology ^*  (Brazil)

^b Centro de Tomografia Computadorizada   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Breast; Elastography; Ultrasonography; US strain imaging

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST TUMOR; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECOMPRESSION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; ELASTICITY; ELASTOGRAPHY; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST DISEASES; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; ELASTICITY IMAGING TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 69949127843     PISSN: 13053825     EISSN: 13053612     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Kaplan SS. Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. Radiology 2001; 221:641-649.
2. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 1995; 196:123-134.
3. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS), ultrasound. 4th ed. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 2003.
4. Ophir J, Céspedes I, Ponnekanti H, Yazdi Y, Li X. Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrason Imaging 1991; 13:111-134.
5. Cho N, Moon WK, Park JS, Cha JH, Jang M, Seong MH. Nonpalpable breast masses: evaluation by US elastography. Korean J Radiol 2008; 9:111-118.
6. Burnside ES, Hall TJ, Sommer AM, et al. Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses with US strain imaging. Radiology 2007; 245:401-410.
7. Regner DM, Hesley GK, Hangiandreou NJ, et al. Breast lesions: evaluation with US strain imaging - clinical experience of multiple observers. Radiology 2006; 238:425-437.
8. Moon WK, Chang RF, Chen CJ, Chen DR, Chen WL. Solid breast masses: classification with computer-aided analysis of continuous US images obtained with probe compression. Radiology 2005; 236:458-464.
9. Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, et al. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology 2006; 239:341-350.
10. Tohno E, Ueno E. Current improvements in breast ultrasound, with a special focus on elastography. Breast Cancer 2008; 15:200-204.
11. Scaperrotta G, Ferranti C, Costa C, et al. Role of sonoelastography in non-palpable breast lesions. Eur Radiol 2008; 18:2381-2389.
12. Fleury EFC, Rinaldi JFR, Piato S, Fleury JCV, Roveda Jr D. Features of cystic breast lesions at ultrasound elastography. Radiol Bras 2008; 41:167-172.
13. Ellis IO, Humphreys S, Michell M, Pinder SE, Wells CA, Zakhour HD; UK National Coordinating Committee for Breast Screening Pathology; European Commission Working Group on Breast Screening Pathology. Best Practice No 179. Guidelines for breast needle core biopsy handling and reporting in breast screening assessment. J Clin Pathol 2004; 57:897-902.
14. Courtillot C, Plu-Bureau G, Binart N, et al. Benign breast diseases. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 2005; 10:325-335.
15. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33:159-174.
16. Youden WJ. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer 1950; 3:32-35.
17. Hoyt K, Forsberg F, Ophir J. Analysis of a hybrid spectral strain estimation technique in elastography. Phys Med Biol 2006; 51:197-209.
18. O'Donnell M, Skovoroda AR, Shapo BM, Emelianov SY. Internal displacement and strain imaging using ultrasonic speckle-tracking. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 1994; 41:314-325.
19. Emelianov SY, Lubinski MA, Weitzel WF, Wiggins RC, Skovoroda AR, O'Donnell M. Elasticity imaging for early detection of renal pathology. Ultrasound Med Biol 1995; 21:871-883.
20. Doyley MM, Bamber JC, Fuechsel F, Bush NL. A freehand elastographic imaging approach for clinical breast imaging: system development and performance evaluation. Ultrasound Med Biol 2001; 27:1347-1357.
21. Krouskop TA, Wheeler F, Kallel F, Garra B, Hall T. Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression. Ultrason Imaging 1998; 20:260-274.
22. Konofagou EE, Ophir J, Krouskop TA, Garra BS. Elastography: from theory to clinical applications. 2003 Summer Bioengineering Conference, June 25-29, Key Biscayne, Florida, USA.
23. Hall TJ. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: topics in US: beyond the basics: elasticity imaging with US. Radiographics 2003; 23:1657-1671.
24. Garra BS, Cespedes EI, Ophir J, et al. Elastography of breast lesions: initial clinical results. Radiology 1997; 202:79-86.
25. Hall TJ, Zhu Y, Spalding CS. In vivo real-time freehand palpation imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003; 29:427-435.
26. Hooke's law. Encyclopedia Britannica Web site. http://www.britannica.com/ eb/article-9040985. Accessed October 18, 2007.
27. Gupta C, Malani AK, Rangineni S. Breast metastasis of ilial carcinoid tumor: case report and literature review. World J Surg Oncol 2006; 4:15.
28. Soo MS, Willifond ME, Walsh R, Bentley RC, Kornguth PJ. Papillary carcinoma of the breast: imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 164:321-326.