Sexual selection and speciation in mammals, butterflies and spiders

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 269, Issue 1507, 2002, Pages 2309-2316

  Gage, Matthew J G ^a   Parker, Geoffrey A ^b   Nylin, Soren ^c   Wiklund, Christer ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^c STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Mating pattern; Size dimorphism; Sperm competition; Sympatric

Indexed keywords

BODY SIZE; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SEXUAL CONFLICT; SEXUAL DIMORPHISM; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BUTTERFLY; CONFLICT; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOLUTION; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; FITNESS; HETEROZYGOSITY; MAMMAL; MATE CHOICE; MATING; MATING SYSTEM; NONHUMAN; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PHYLOGENY; POLYANDRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCTION; SEX DIFFERENCE; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; SPERM COMPETITION; SPIDER; SYMPATRY; VARIANCE;

ANIMALIA; ARANEAE; MAMMALIA; PAPILIONOIDEA;

EID: 53149151047     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2154     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Ackery, P. R. 1984 Systematic and faunistic studies of butterflies. In The Biology of Butterflies (ed. R. I. Vane-Wright & P. R. Ackery), pp. 9-21. London: Academic.
2. Agapow, P.-M. & Isaac, N. J. B. 2002 MacroCaic: Correlations of species richness. Diversity and Distributions. (In the press.)
3. Alipaz, J. A., Wu, C.-I. & Karr, T. L. 2001 Gametic incompatibilities between races of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268, 789-795. (DOI 10.1098/rspb.2000.1420.)
4. Andersson, M. 1994 Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press.
5. Arnqvist, G. 1998 Comparative evidence for the evolution of genitalia by sexual selection. Nature 393, 784-786.
6. Arnqvist, G., Edvardsson, M., Friberg, U. & Nilsson, T. 2000 Sexual conflict promotes speciation in insects. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 10 460-10 464.
7. Barraclough, T.G., Harvey, P.H. & Nee, S. 1995 Sexual selection and taxonomic diversity in passerine birds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 259, 211-215.
8. Bateman, A.J. 1948 Intrasexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2, 349-368.
9. Birkhead, T. R. & Møller, A. P. 1998 Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection. London: Academic.
10. Chapman, T., Liddle, L. F., Kalb, J. M., Wolfner, M. F. & Partridge, L. 1995 Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster is mediated by male accessory-gland products. Nature 373, 241-244.
11. Clutton-Brock, T. H. & Parker, G. A. 1992 Potential reproductive rates and the operation of sexual selection. Q. Rev. Biol. 67, 437-456.
12. Clutton-Brock, T. H. & Parker, G. A. 1995 Sexual coercion in animal societies. Anim. Behav. 49, 1345-1365.
13. Corbet, A. S. & Pendlebury, H. M. 1992 The Butterflies of the Malay Peninsula. Kuala Lumpar: Malayan Nature Society.
14. Corbet, G. B. & Hill, J. E. 1991 A World List of Mammalian Species, 3rd Edn. Oxford: British Museum of Natural History. London & Oxford University Press.
15. Darwin, C. 1871 The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: Murray.
16. DeVries, P. J. 1987 The Butterflies of Costa Rica and their Natural History, Papilionidae, Pieridae, Nymphalidae. Princeton University Press.
17. Drummond, B. A. 1984 Multiple mating and sperm competition in the Lepidoptera. In Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems (ed. R. L. Smith), pp. 291-370. London: Academic.
18. Eberhard, W. G. 1985 Sexual Selection and Animal Genitalia. London: Harvard University Press.
19. Eberhard, W. G. 1996 Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice. Princeton University Press.
20. Elgar, M. A. 1998 Sexual selection and sperm competition in arachnids. In Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection (ed. T. R. Birkhead & A. P. Møller), pp. 307-339. London: Academic.
21. Emlen, S. T. & Oring, L. W. 1977 Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197, 215-223.
22. Gavrilets, S. 2000 Rapid evolution of reproductive barriers driven by sexual conflict. Nature 403, 886-889.
23. Gavrilets, S., Arnqvist, G. & Friberg, U. 2001 The evolution of female mate choice by sexual conflict. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268, 531-539. (DOI 10.1098/rspb.2000.1382.)
24. Ginsberg, J. R. & Rubenstein, D. J. 1990 Sperm competition and variation in zebra mating behaviour. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 26, 427-434.
25. Gwynne, D. T. & Simmons, L. W. 1990 Experimental reversal of courtship roles in an insect. Nature 346, 172-174.
26. Harcourt, A. H. 1991 Sperm competition and the evolution of non-fertilizing sperm in mammals. Evolution 45, 314-328.
27. Harvey, P. H. & Pagel, M. D. 1991 The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford University Press.
28. Hewitt, G. M., Mason, P. & Nichols, R. A. 1989 Sperm precedence and homogamy across a hybrid zone in the alpine grasshopper Podisma pedestris. Heredity 62, 343-354.
29. Higashi, M., Takimoto, G. & Yamamura, N. 1999 Sympatric speciation by sexual selection. Nature 402, 523-526.
30. Holland, B. & Rice, W. R. 1999 Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 5083-5088.
31. Hosken, D. J. 1997 Sperm competition in bats. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264, 385-392. (DOI 10.1098/rspb.1997.0055.)
32. Hosken, D. J. 1998 Testes mass in megachiropteran bats varies in relation to sperm competition theory. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 44, 169-177.
33. Houde, A. E. & Endler, J. A. 1990 Correlated evolution of female mating preferences and male color patterns in the guppy Poecilia reticulata. Science 248, 1405-1408.
34. Jiggins, C. D., Naisbit, R. E., Coe, R. L. & Mallet, J. 2001 Reproductive isolation caused by colour pattern mimicry. Nature 411, 302-305.
35. Kenagy, G. J. & Trombulak, S. C. 1986 Size and function of mammalian testes in relation to body size. J. Mammal. 67, 1-22.
36. Lande, R. 1980 Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution 34, 292-305.
37. Lande, R. 1981 Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 78, 3721-3725.
38. Larsen, T. B. 1991 The butterflies of Kenya and their natural history. Oxford University Press.
39. Lindenfors, P. & Tullberg, B. S. 1998 Phylogenetic analyses of primate size evolution: The consequences of sexual selection. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 64, 413-447.
40. McMillan, W. O., Jiggins, C. D. & Mallet, J. 1997 What initiates speciation in passion-vine butterflies? Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 8628-8633.
41. Magurran, A. E. 1998 Population differentiation without speciation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 353, 275-286. (DOI 10.1098/rstb.1998.0209.)
42. Mayr, E. 1963 Animal Species and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43. Morrow, E. H. & Gage, M. J. G. 2000 The evolution of sperm length in moths. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267, 307-313. (DOI 10.1098/rspb.2000.1001.)
44. Novacek, M. J. 1992 Mammalian phylogeny: Shaking the tree. Nature 356, 121-125.
45. Nylin, S., Nyblom, K., Ronquist, F., Janz, N., Belicek, J. & Källersjö, K. 2001 Phylogeny of Polygonia, Nymphalis and related butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): A total-evidence analysis. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 132, 441-468.
46. Owens, I. P. F., Bennett, P. M. & Harvey, P. H. 1999 Species richness among birds: body size, life history, sexual selection or ecology? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266, 933-939. (DOI 10.1098/rspb. 1999.0726.)
47. Parker, G. A. 1970 Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biol. Rev. 45, 525-567.
48. Parker, G. A. 1979 Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects (ed. M. S. Blum & N. A. Blum), pp. 123-166. New York: Academic.
49. Parker, G.A. 1983 Arms races in evolution: An ESS to the opponent-independent costs game. J. Theor. Biol. 101, 619-648.
50. Parker, G. A. & Partridge, L. 1998 Sexual conflict and speciation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B353, 261-274. (DOI 10.1098/rstb.1998.0208.)
51. Parker, G. A., Ball, M. A., Stockley, P. & Gage, M. J. G. 1997 Sperm competition games: a prospective analysis of risk assessment. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B263, 1793-1802. (DOI 10.1098/rspb.1997.0249.)
52. Parsons, M. 1999 The Butterflies of Papua New Guinea: Their Systematics and Biology. San Diego, CA: Academic.
53. Purvis, A. & Rambaut, A. 1994 Comparative Analysis by Independent Contrasts (Caic), v. 2. Oxford University Press.
54. Rice, W. R. & Holland, B. 1997 The enemies within: Intergenomic conflict, interlocus contest evolution (ICE), and the intraspecific Red Queen. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41, 1-10.
55. Roberts, M. J. 1996 Spiders of Britain and Northern Europe. London: HarperCollins.
56. Samu, F., Toft, S. & Kiss, B. 1999 Factors influencing cannibalism in the wolf spider Pardosa agrestis (Araneae, Lycosidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 45, 349-354.
57. Scott, J. A. 1986 The Butterflies of North America. Stanford University Press.
58. Seehausen, O. & von Alphen, J. M. 1999 Can sympatric speciation by disruptive sexual selection explain rapid evolution of cichlid diversity in Lake Victoria? Ecol. Lett. 2, 262-271.
59. Short, R. V. 1997 The testis: The witness of the mating system, the site of mutation and the engine of desire. Acta Paediatr. 86, 3-7.
60. Silva, M. & Downing, J. A. 1995 CRC Handbook of Mammalian Body Masses. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
61. Simmons, L. W., Stockley, P., Jackson, R. L. & Parker, G. A. 1996 Sperm competition or sperm selection: No evidence for female influence over paternity in yellow dung flies Scatophaga stercoraria. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 38, 199-206.
62. Smart, P. 1975 The Illustrated Encyclopedia of the Butterfly World. London: Salamander Books.
63. Smuts, B. B. & Smuts, R. W. 1993 Male aggression and sexual coercion of females in non-human primates and other mammals: evidence and theoretical implications. Adv. Stud. Behav. 22, 1-63.
64. Spencer Smith, D., Miller, L. D. & Miller, J. Y. 1994 The Butterflies of the West Indies and South Florida. Oxford University Press.
65. Stearns, S. C. 1983 The influence of size and phylogeny on patterns of covariation among life-history traits in mammals. Oikos 41, 173-187.
66. Stockley, P. 1997 Sexual conflict resulting from adaptations to sperm competition. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12, 154-159.
67. Svärd, L. & Wiklund, C. 1989 Mass and production rates of ejaculates in relation to monandry-polyandry in butterflies. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 24, 395-402.
68. Tregenza, T. & Wedell, N. 2002 Polyandrous females avoid costs of inbreeding. Nature 415, 71-73.
69. Trivers, R. L. 1972 Parental investment and sexual selection. In Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871-1971 (ed. B. Campbell), pp. 136-179. London: Heinemann.
70. Turner, G. F. & Burrows, M. T. 1995 A model of sympatric speciation by sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 260, 287-292.
71. Tuzov, V. K. 1997 Guide to the Butterflies of Russia and Adjacent Territories, vol. 1. Hesperiidae, Papilonidae, Pieridae, Satyridae. Sofia, Bulgaria: Pensoft.
72. Tuzov, V. K. 2000 Guide to the Butterflies of Russia and Adjacent Territories, vol. 2. Libytheidae, Danaidae, Nymphalidae, Riodinidae, Lycaenidae. Sofia, Bulgaria: Pensoft.
73. van Doorn, G. S., Noest, A. J. & Hogeweg, P. 1998 Sympatric speciation and extinction driven by environment dependent sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B265, 1915-1919. (DOI 10.1098/rspb.1998.0520.)
74. Wahlberg, N. 2000 The Ecology and Evolution of Melitaeine Butterflies. PhD thesis, University of Helsinki, Finland.
75. Wiklund, C. & Forsberg, J. 1991 Sexual size dimorphism in relation to female polygamy and protandry in butterflies: A comparative study of Swedish Pieridae and Satyridae. Oikos 60, 373-381.
76. Wiklund, C., Kaitala, A. & Wedell, N. 1998 Decoupling of reproductive rates and parental expenditure in a polyandrous butterfly. Behav. Ecol. 9, 20-25.