Teacher trainees as learning object designers: Problems and issues in learning object development process

Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 118-127

  Güler, Çetin ^a   Altun, Arif ^b  

^a MUSTAFA KEMAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Content design; Learning object development; Learning objects; Teacher training

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649455486     PISSN: None     EISSN: 13036521     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. ADL, (2004). SCORM content aggregation model - version 1.3.1. Retrieved March 16, 2008 from http://www.adlnet.org/downloads/70.cfm.
2. Akpinar, Y. (2009). Conventional and web based reflection tools in learning the design of interactive learning objects. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 215-218.
3. Akpinar, Y. & Şimsek, H. (2007). Pre-service Teachers' Learning Object Development: A Case Study in K-12 Setting. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 3.
4. Altun, A. & Aşkar, P. (2008). An Ontological Approach to Designing Learning Objects. Paper presented at ELearn, November 17-21, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
5. Altun, A. & Atasayar, A. (2009). Kavram Ögretiminde İçerik Geliştirme Yazarligi İçin Üstverilerin Belirlenmesi. International Educational Technology Conference (IECT), Ankara, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, 6-8 May 2009.
6. Becker, H. (2000). Findings from the Teaching, Learning, and Computing Survey. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8, 51. Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/442
7. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design Experiments: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges in Creating Complex Interventions in Classroom Settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178.
8. Boot, E. W., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Theunissen, N. C. M. (2008). Improving the development of instructional software: Three building-block solutions to interrelate design and production. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 1275-1292.
9. Churchill, D. (2007). Towards a useful classification of learning objects. ETR&D-Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(5), 479-497.
10. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., DiSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design Experiments in Educational Research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9-13.
11. Cohen, E. B. & Nycz, M. (2006). Learning objects and e-learning: an informing science perspective. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 2,(23-34). Available at http://ijklo.org/Volume2/v2p023-034Cohen32.pdf
12. Di Nitto, E., Mainetti, L., Monga, M., Sbattella, L., & Tedesco, R. (2006). Supporting interoperability and reusability of learning objects: The virtual campus approach. Educational Technology & Society, 9(2), 33-50.
13. Enkenberg, J. (2001). Instructional design and emerging teaching models in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 17(5-6), 495-506.
14. Fritz, S., King, J. & Boren, A. (2005). Principles of Sustainable Learning Object Libraries. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, (1).
15. Gonzalez-Barbone, V., & Anido-Rifon, L. (2008). Creating the first SCORM object. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1634-1647.
16. González-Videgaray, M., Hernández-Zamora, G., & del-Río-Martínez, J. H. (2009). Learning objects in theory and practice: A vision from Mexican University teachers. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1330-1338.
17. Griffiths, J., Stubbs, G., & Watkins, M. (2007). From course notes to granules: A guide to deriving Learning Object components. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(6), 2696-2720.
18. Güler, Ç., Altun, A., Aşkar, P (2009). Developing reusable learning objects: Hacettepe University case. Paper Presented at the Third International Conference on Internet Technologies and Applications (ITA 09) Conference, 8 - 11 September, Wrexham, North Wales, UK.
19. Han, S. & Bhattacharya, K. (2001). Constructionism, Learning by Design, and Project-based Learning. In M. Orey (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology Available from http://www.coe.uga.edu/epltt/LearningbyDesign.htm.
20. Igbaria, M., Zinatelli, N., Cragg, P. & Cavaye, A. L. M. (1997). Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: a structure equation model. MIS Quarterly, 21(3), 279-306.
21. Kremers, M. & van Dissel, H. (2000). ERP system migrations. Communication of the ACM, 43(4), 53-56.
22. Laverde, A. C., Cifuentes, Y. S., & Rodriguez, H. Y. R. (2007). Toward an instructional design model based on learning objects. ETR&D-Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(6), 671-681.
23. Mavrommatis, G. (2008). Learning objects and objectives towards automatic learning construction. European Journal of Operational Research, 187(3), 1449-1458.
24. Shavelson, R. J., Phillips, D. C., Towne, L., & Feuer, M. J. (2003). On the Science of Education Design Studies. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 25-28.
25. Wang, F. & Hannafin, M. (2004). Using design-based research in design and research of technology-enhanced learning environments. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
26. Wiley, D. & Edwards, E. (2002). Online self-organizing social systems: The decentralized future of online learning. Retrieved February 27, 2008 http://wiley.ed.usu.edu/docs/ososs.pdf.
27. Wiley, D. (2006). RIP-ping on learning objects. Consultado en 01, 15, 2006 en. Retrieved December 2, 2008 from http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/230.