Two synonymy cases within the genus Neoseiulella (Acari: Phytoseiidae): Is the molecular evidence so evident?

Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 101, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 323-344

  Kanouh, Mohamad ^a   Tixier, Marie Stephane ^a   Guichou, Sabine ^a   Brigitte, Cheval ^a   Kreiter, Serge ^a  

^a INSTITUT DE RECHERCHE POUR LE DÉVELOPPEMENT   (France)

Author keywords

Bayesian analyses; Markers; N. aceri; N. aceris; N. formosa; N. squamiger; N. tiliarum

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; BIOLOGICAL CONTROL; CYTOCHROME; GENE FLOW; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIATION; MITE; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; MORPHOLOGY; NATURAL ENEMY; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION;

ACARI; PHYTOSEIIDAE;

EID: 78649400766     PISSN: 00244066     EISSN: 10958312     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01516.x     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Athias-Henriot C. 1975. Nouvelles notes sur les Amblyseiini. II. Le relevé organotaxique de la face dorsal adulte (Gamasides, Protoadéniques, Phytoseiidae). Acarologia 27: 20-29.
2. Bjørnson S. 2008. Natural enemies of mass-reared predatory mites (family Phytoseiidae) used for biological pest control. Experimental and Applied Acarology 46: 299-306.
3. Breeuwer JA, Jacobs G. 1996. Wolbachia: intracellular manipulators of mite reproduction. Experimental and Applied Acarology 20: 421-434.
4. Chant DA. 1959. Phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Part II. A taxonomie review of the family Phytoseiidae, with descriptions of 38 new species. Canadian Entomologist 91 (Suppl. 12): 45-164.
5. Chant DA, McMurtry JA. 2007. Illustrated keys and diagnoses for the genera and subgenera of the Phytoseiidae of the world (Acari: Mesostigmata). West Bloomfield, MI: Indira Publishing House, 220 pp.
6. Chant DA, Yoshida-Shaul E. 1987. A world review of the pyri species group in the genus Typhlodromus Scheuten (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 65: 1770-1804.
7. Chant DA, Yoshida-Shaul E. 1989. A world review of the tiliarum species group in the genus Typhlodromus Scheuten (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 67: 1006-1046.
8. Collyer E. 1957. Two new species of the genus Typhlodromus Scheuten, 1857 (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Annual Magazine of Natural History 12: 199-203.
9. Cruickshank RH. 2002. Molecular markers for the phylogenetics of mites and ticks. Systematic and Applied Acarology 7: 3-14.
10. Dabert M. 2006. DNA markers in the phylogenetics of the Acari. Biological Letters 43: 97-107.
11. Denmark HA, Rather AQ. 1984. Revision of the genus Typhloctonus Muma, 1961 (Acarina: Mesostigmata). International Journal of Acarology 10: 163-177.
12. Denmark HA, Rather AQ. 1996. Revision of the genus Neoseiulella Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae). International Journal of Acarology 22: 43-77.
13. Edland T, Evans GO. 1998. The genus Typhlodromus (Acari: Mesostigmata) in Norway. European Journal of Entomology 95: 275-295.
14. Ferreira J, Eshuis B, Janssen A. 2008. Domatia reduce larval cannibalism in predatory mites. Ecological Entomology 33: 374-379.
15. Funk DJ, Omland KE. 2003. Species-level paraphyly and polyphyly: frequency, causes, and consequences, with insights from animal mitochondrial DNA. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 34: 397-423.
16. Gaston KJ, Scoble MJ, Crock A. 1995. Patterns in species description: a case study using the Geometridae (Lepidoptera). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 55: 225-237.
17. Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, De Waard JR. 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences 270: 313-321.
18. Hebert PDN, Stoeckle MY, Zemlak TS, Francis CM. 2004. Identification of birds through DNA barcodes. PLoS Biology 2: e312, 1657-1663.
19. Helle W, Sabelis MW. 1985. Spider mites: their biology, natural enemies and control, Vol. 1B. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
20. Hirschmann W. 1962. Acarologie. Gangsystematik der Parasitiformes. Teil 5. Gamasiden-Schriftenreihe Vergleichende Milbenkunde. Fürth/Bayem Folge 5: 1-56.
21. Holder M, Lewis PO. 2003. Phylogeny estimation: traditional and Bayesian approaches. Nature Reviews Genetics 4: 275-284.
22. Hoy MA, Jeyaprakash A. 2005. Microbial diversity in the predatory mite Metaseiulus occidentalis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and its prey, Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae). Biological Control 32: 427-441.
23. Hurtado MA, Ansaloni T, Cros-Arteil S, Jacas JA, Navajas M. 2008. Sequence analysis of the ribosomal internal transcribed spacers region in spider mites (Prostigmata Tetranychidae) occurencing in citrus orchards in Eastern Spain use for species discrimination. Annals Applied Biology 153: 167-174.
24. Jeyaprakash A, Hoy MA. 2000. Long PCR improves Wolbachia DNA amplifications: wsp sequences found in 76% of sixty three arthropod species. Insect Molecular Biology 9: 393-405.
25. Jeyaprakash A, Hoy MA. 2002. Mitochondrial 12S rDNA sequence used to design a molecular ladder assay to identify six commercially available phytoseiids (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Biological Control 25: 136-142.
26. Johanowicz DL, Hoy MA. 1996. Wolbachia in a Predator-Prey System: 16S Ribosomal DNA Analysis of Two Phytoseiids (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and Their Prey (Acari: Tetranychidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 89: 435-441.
27. Johanowicz DL, Hoy MA. 1999. Wolbachia infection dynamics in experimental laboratory populations of Metaseiulus occidentalis. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 93: 259-268.
28. Jordal BH, Hewitt GM. 2004. The origin and radiation of macaronesian beetles breeding in Euphorbia: the relative importance of multiple data partitions and population sampling. Systematic Biology 53: 711-734.
29. Karban R, Loeb GE, Walker MA, Thaler J. 1995. Abundance of phytoseiid mites on Vitis species: effects of leaf hairs, domatia, prey abundance plant phylogeny. Experimental and Applied Acarology 19: 189-197.
30. Klimov PB, O'Connor BM. 2008. Origin and higher-level relationships of psoroptidian mites (Acari: Astigmata: Psoroptidia): evidence from three nuclear genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 47: 1135-1156.
31. Kolodochka LA. 1986. On taxonomic status of two Typhloctonus species (Parasitiformes, Phytoseiidae) [in Russian]. Vestnik Zoologii 2: 26-34.
32. Kolodochka LA. 2009. A review of predaceous mites of the genus Typhloctonus Muma (Parasitiformes, Phytoseiidae) in Ukraine with the description of unkown male of T. tuberculatus. Vestnik Zoologii 43: 481-494.
33. Kostiainen TS, Hoy MA. 1996. The Phytoseiidae as biological control agents of pest mites and insects. A bibliography. Monograph 17, Gainesville. University of Florida, Agricultural Experiment Station, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, 355 pp.
34. Lehman RD. 1982. Mites (Acari) of Pennsylvania conifers. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 108: 181-286.
35. Lindquist EE. 1994. Some observations on the chaetotaxy of the caudal body region of Gamasine mites (Acari: Mesostigmata), with a modified notation for some ventrocaudal body setae. Acarologia 35: 323-326.
36. Lindquist EE, Evans GO. 1965. Taxonomic concepts in the Ascidae, with a modified setal nomenclature for the Idiosoma of the Gamasina (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada 47: 1-64.
37. Livshitz IZ, Kuznetsov NN. 1972. Phytoseiid mites from Crimea (Parasitiformes: Phytoseiidae) [in Russian]. In: Pests and diseases of fruit and ornamental plants. Proceedings of The All-Union V. I. Lenin Academy of Agricultural Science, The State Nikita Botanical Gardens 61: 13-64.
38. McMurtry JA, Croft BA. 1997. Life-styles of phytoseiid mites and their roles in biological control. Annual Review of Entomology 42: 291-321.
39. De Moraes GJ, McMurtry JA, Denmark HA, Campos CB. 2004. A revised catalog of the mite family Phytoseiidae. Zootaxa 434: 1-494.
40. Navajas M, Fenton B. 2000. The application of molecular markers in the study of diversity in acarology: a review. Experimental and Applied Acarology 24: 751-774.
41. Navajas M, Lagnel J, Fauvel G, De Moraes GJ. 1999. Sequence variation of Ribosomal Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) in commercially important Phytoseiidae mites. Experimental and Applied Acarology 23: 851-859.
42. Niogret J, Nicot A. 2008. Combined approach using morphology and ITS-sequence for description of three new species of Macrocheles (Acari: Macrochelidae). Zootaxa 1873: 39-49.
43. Niogret J, Nicot A, De Stordeur E, Bertrand M. 2007. Combination of morphological characters and ITS-sequence to characterize a new species of Macrocheles (Acari: Macrochelidae). Zootaxa 1386: 19-29.
44. Nylander JAA, Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP, Nieves-Aldrey JL. 2004. Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of combined data. Systematic Biology 53: 47-67.
45. Okassa M, Tixier MS, Cheval B, Kreiter S. 2009. Molecular and morphological evidence for a new species status within the genus Euseius (Acari: Phytoseiidae): consequences for taxonomy. Canadian Journal of Zoology 87: 689-698.
46. Okassa M, Tixier MS, Kreiter S. 2010. The use of two mitochondrial DNA fragments (12S rRNA and Cytb mtDNA) for assessing the diagnosis of Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot and Phytoseiulus macropilis (Banks) (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Experimental and Applied Acarology DOI: 10.1007/s10493-010-9364-x.
47. Oudemans AC. 1930. Acarologische Aanteekeningen. CI. Entomologische Berichten 8: 48-53.
48. Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
49. Ragusa S, Tsolakis H. 1994. Revision of the genus Kampimodromus Nesbitt, 1951 (Parasitiformes, Phytoseiidae) with a description of a new species. Acarologia 35: 305-322.
50. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MrBayes 3: bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics (Oxford) 19: 1572-1574.
51. Rowell HJ, Chant DA, Hansell RIC. 1978. The determination of setal homologies and setal patterns on the dorsal shield in the family Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Canadian Entomologist 110: 859-876.
52. Rubinoff D, Cameron S, Will K. 2006. A Genomic Perspective on the Shortcomings of Mitochondrial DNA for 'Barcoding' Identification. Journal of Heredity 97: 581-594.
53. Sabelis MW. 1999. Evolution of plant-predator mutualisms: an introduction to the symposium. In: Needham GR, Mitchell R, Horn DJ, Welbourn WC, eds. Acarology IX Symposia Ohio Biological Survey. Columbus, OH: Ohio Biological Survey, 205-213.
54. Seelmann L, Auer A, Hoffmann D, Schausberger P. 2007. Leaf pubescence mediates intraguild predation between predatory mites. Oikos 116: 807-817.
55. StatSoft France 2008. STATISTICA - (logiciel de l'analyse de données), Version 8.1 [computer program.
56. Swirski E, Amitai S. 1984. Notes on phytoseiid mites (Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae) from the Mediterranean littoral zone of Israel, with a description of a new species of Typhloctonus. Israel Journal of Entomology 18: 71-82.
57. Swirski E, Ragusa S, Tsolakis H. 1998. Keys to the phytoseiid mites (Parasitiformes: Phytoseiidae) of Israel. Phytophaga 8: 85-154.
58. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S. 2007. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24: 1596-1599.
59. Tixier MS, Kreiter S, Ferragut F, Cheval B. 2006a. The suspected synonymy of Kampimodromus hmiminai and Kampimodromus adrianae (Acari: Phytoseiidae): morphological and molecular investigations. Canadian Journal of Zoology 84: 1216-1222.
60. Tixier MS, Kreiter S, Barbar Z, Ragusa S, Cheval B. 2006b. The status of two cryptic species: Typhlodromus exhilaratus Ragusa and Typhlodromus phialatus Athias-Henriot (Acari: Phytoseiidae): consequences for taxonomy. Zoologica Scripta 35: 115-122.
61. Tixier MS, Kreiter S, De Moraes GJ. 2008. Biogeographic distribution of the mites of the family Phytoseiidae (Acari: Mesostigmata). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 93: 845-856.
62. Tixier MS, Ferrero M, Okassa M, Guichou S, Kreiter S. 2010. On the specific identity of specimens of Phytoseiulus longipes Evans (Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae) showing different feeding behaviours: morphological and molecular analyses. Bulletin of Entomological Research doi:10.1017/S0007485309990617.
63. Tselila BD, Melamed S, Gerson S, Morin S. 2007. ITS2 sequences as barcodes for identifying and analysing spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae). Experimental and Applied Acarology 41: 169-181.
64. Wade MJ. 2001. Infectious speciation. Nature 409: 675-676.
65. Wainstein BA. 1958. New species of mites of the genus Typhlodromus (Parasitiformes: Phytoseiidae) from Georgia [in Russian]. Soobshcheniya Akademii Nauk Gruzinskoy SSR 21: 201-207.
66. Wainstein BA. 1960. New species and subspecies of the genus Typhlodromus Scheuten (Parasitiformes, Phytoseiidae) of the USSR fauna [in Russian]. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 39: 683-690.
67. Walter DE. 1992. Leaf surface structure and the distribution of Phytoseius mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) in South-eastern Australian forests. Australian Journal of Zoology 40: 593-603.
68. Walter DE. 1996. Living on leaves: mites, tomenta, and leaf domatia. Annual Review of Entomology 41: 101-114.
69. Walter DE, O'Dowd DJ. 1992. Leaf morphology and predators: effect of leaf domatia on the abundance of predatory mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Environmental Entomology 21: 478-484.
70. Wiens JJ, Servedio MR. 2000. Species delimitation in systematics: inferring 'fixed' diagnostic differences between species. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences 267: 631-636.
71. Will KW, Rubinoff D. 2004. Myth of the molecule: DNA barcodes for species cannot replace morphology for identification and classification. Cladistics 20: 47-55.
72. Will KW, Mishler BD, Wheeler QD. 2005. The perils of DNA barcoding and the need for integrative taxonomy. Systematic Biology 54: 844-851.