Biogeographic distribution of the Phytoseiidae (Acari: Mesostigmata)

Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 93, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 845-856

  Tixier, Marie Stéphane ^a   Kreiter, Serge ^a   De Moraes, Gilberto J ^b  

^a CENTRE DE BIOLOGIE ET DE GESTION DES POPULATIONS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Taxonomy

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; BIOGEOGRAPHY; DISPERSAL; ENDEMISM; EVOLUTION; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; MITE; PHYLOGENETICS; PREDATOR; TAXONOMY; VICARIANCE;

AFRICA; AUSTRALASIA; AUSTRALIA; EAST AFRICA; ETHIOPIA; SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA;

ACARI; MESOSTIGMATA; PHYTOSEIIDAE;

EID: 40749143566     PISSN: 00244066     EISSN: 10958312     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00937.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Brown JH, Lomolino MV. 1998. Biogeography, 2nd edn. Sunderland, MA : Sinauer Associates, Inc., Publishers.
2. Chant DA. 1992. Trends in the discovery of new species and adult setal patterns in the family Phytoseiidae (Acari: Gamasina), 1839-1989. International Journal of Acarology 18 : 323 362.
3. Chant DA. 1993. Adaptive radiation in the family Phytoseiidae (Acari: Gamasina) as reflected by adult idiosomal setation. International Journal of Acarology 19 : 203 223.
4. Chant DA, McMurtry JA. 1994. A review of the subfamilies Phytoseiinae and Typhlodrominae (Acari: Phytoseiidae). International Journal of Acarology 20 : 223 310.
5. Chant DA, McMurtry JA. 2003a. A review of the subfamilies Amblyseiinae (Acari: Phytoseiidae): Part II. Neoseiulini new tribe. International Journal of Acarology 29 : 3 46.
6. Chant DA, McMurtry JA. 2003b. A review of the subfamilies Amblyseiinae (Acari: Phytoseiidae): Part II. The tribe Kampimodromini. International Journal of Acarology 29 : 179 224.
7. Chant DA, McMurtry JA. 2004a. A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae): Part III. The tribe Amblyseiini Wainstein, subtribe Amblyseiina N. subtribe. International Journal of Acarology 30 : 171 228.
8. Chant DA, McMurtry JA. 2004b. A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae): part IV. The tribe Amblyseiini Wainstein, subtrive Arrenoseiina Chant and McMurtry. International Journal of Acarology 30 : 291 312.
9. Chant DA, McMurtry JA. 2005a. A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae): part V. Tribe Amblyseiini, subtribe Proprioseiopsina Chant and McMurtry. International Journal of Acarology 31 : 3 22.
10. Chant DA, McMurtry JA. 2005b. A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae): part VI. The tribe Euseiini N. tribe, subtribes Typhlodromalina, N. subtribe, Euseiina N. subtribe and Ricoseiina N. subtribe. International Journal of Acarology 31 : 187 224.
11. Chant DA, McMurtry JA. 2005c. A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae): part VII. Typhlodromipsini n. tribe. International Journal of Acarology 31 : 315 340.
12. Chant DA, McMurtry JA. 2006a. A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae): part VIII. The tribes Macroseiini Chant, Denmark and Baker, Phytoseiulini n. tribe, Africoseiulini n. tribe and Indoseiulini Ehara and Amano. International Journal of Acarology 32 : 13 25.
13. Chant DA, McMurtry JA. 2006b. A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae): part IX. An overview. International Journal of Acarology 32 : 125 152.
14. Cox B. 2001. The biogeographic regions reconsidered. Journal of Biogeography 28 : 511 523.
15. Crisci JV. 2001. The voice of historical biogeography. Journal of Biogeography 28 : 157 168.
16. De Grave S. 2001. Biogeography of Indo-Pacific Pontoniinae (Crustacea, Decapoda): a PAE analysis. Journal of Biogeography 28 : 1239 1253.
17. Gaston KJ. 2000. Global patterns in biodiversity. Nature 405 : 220 227.
18. Humphries CJ, Parenti LR. 1999. Cladistic biogeography. Interpreting patterns of plant and animal distribution, 2nd edn. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
19. Kostiainen TS, Hoy MA. 1996. The Phytoseiidae as biological control agents of pest mites and insects. A bibliography. Monograph 17, Gainesville, FL : University of Florida, Agricultural Experiment Station.
20. Kreiter S, Tixier MS. 2006. A new genus and a new species of Phytoseiid mites (Acari: Mesostigmata) from Southern Tunisia with analysis and discussion on its phylogenetic position. Zootaxa 1237 : 1 18.
21. McMurtry JA, Croft BA. 1997. Life-styles of phytoseiid mites and their roles in biological control. Annual Review of Entomology 42 : 291 321.
22. Moraes GJ, McMurtry JA, Denmark HA, Campos CB. 2004. A revised catalog of the mite family Phytoseiidae. Zootaxa 434 : 1 494.
23. Moraes GJ, McMurtry JA, Mineiro JLC. 2003. A new genus and species of phytoseiid mite (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from Brazil. International Journal of Acarology 29 : 47 54.
24. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Da Fonseca GA, Kent J. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403 : 853 858.
25. Ragusa S. 2003. Description of a new genus and of two new species of phytoseiid mites (Parasiformes, Phytoseiidae) collected in Chile. Acarologia 43 : 337 344.
26. Rosen BR. 1988. Progress, problems and patterns in the biogeography of reef corals and other tropical marine organisms. Helgolander Meeresuntersuchungen 42 : 269 301.
27. Selden PA. 1993. Arthropoda (Aglaspidida, Pycnegonida and Chelicerata). In : Benton MJ, ed. The fossil record 2. New York, NY : Chapman & Hall, 297 320.
28. StatSoft France. 2005. STATISTICA (logiciel d'analyse de données), version 7.1. Available at http://www.statsoft.fr
29. Storch D, Gaston KJ. 2004. Untangling ecological complexity on different scales of space and time. Basic and Applied Ecology 5 : 389 400.
30. Swofford DL. 1998. 'PAUP': phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods), version 4.01b. Sunderland, MA : Sinauer.
31. Taylor PH, Gaines SD. 1999. Can rapoport's rule be rescued? Modeling causes of latitudinal gradient in species richness. Ecology 80 : 2474 2482.
32. Wallace AR. 1876. The geographical distribution of animals. Washington, DC : Smithsonian Institution Press.