Influence of varied human movement control on task performance and feeling of telepresence

Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 463-481

  Peer, Angelika ^a   Pongrac, Helena ^b   Buss, Martin ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b Management Consult Dr Eisele and Dr Noll   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BENEFICIAL EFFECTS; CONTROL ALGORITHMS; DEGREES OF FREEDOM; DEVELOPMENT PROCESS; HAPTIC FEEDBACKS; HUMAN FACTORS; HUMAN MOVEMENTS; HUMAN OPERATOR; HUMAN SYSTEM INTERFACE; INTERACTION FORCES; MECHATRONIC DESIGN; MULTIPLE DEGREES OF FREEDOM; NEW DESIGN; POSITIVE EFFECTS; ROTATIONAL DEGREES OF FREEDOM; TASK PERFORMANCE; TELE-ROBOTICS; TELEMANIPULATION; TELEMANIPULATION SYSTEMS; TELEPRESENCE; VISUAL DEPTH;

ALGORITHMS; DESIGN; HUMAN ENGINEERING; MANIPULATORS; MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS; MECHANICS;

VISUAL COMMUNICATION;

EID: 78649355250     PISSN: 10547460     EISSN: 15313263     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/pres_a_00007     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Arcara, P., & Melchiorri, C. (2002). Control schemes for teleoperation with time delay: A comparative study. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 38, 49-64.
2. Baier, H., Freyberger, F., & Schmidt, G. (2001). A high fidelity interactive stereo vision system and its application to teleoperation tasks. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Advances in Interactive Multimodal Telepresence Systems, 33-42.
3. Bernstein, N. A. (1967). The coordination and regulation of movements. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
4. Brooks, T. (1990). Telerobotic response requirements. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 113-120.
5. Cavusoglu, M. C., Williams, W., Tendick, F., & Sastry, S. S. (2003). Robotics for telesurgery: Second generation Berkeley/ UCSF laparoscopic telesurgical workstation and looking towards the future applications. Industrial Robot, Special Issue on Medical Robotics, 30(1), 22-29.
6. Cohen, J. (1998). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Deml, B. (2004). Telepräsenzsysteme: Gestaltung der Mensch- System-Schnittstelle. PhD thesis, Universität der Bundeswehr München.
8. Dorsch, F., Häcker, H., & Stapf, H. K. (1998). Dorsch Psychologisches Wörterbuch. Bern, Switzerland: Huber.
9. Ellson, D. C. (1947). The independence of tracking in two and three dimensions with the B-29 pedestal sight. Technical Report TSEAA-694-2G, Aero Medical Laboratory.
10. Feygin, D., Keehner, M., & Tendick, F. (2002). Haptic guidance: Experimental evaluation of a haptic training method for a perceptual motor skill. In Proceedings of the 10th Internation Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, Haptics 2002, 40-47.
11. Fischer, P., Daniel, R., & Siva, K. (1990). Specification and design of input devices for teleoperation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 540-545.
12. Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47(6), 381-391.
13. Forsyth, B. A. C., & MacLean, K. E. (2006). Predictive haptic guidance: Intelligent user assistance for the control of dynamic tasks. IEEE Transactions on Visual Computer Graphics, 12, 103-113.
14. Gardner, J. F. (1950). Direction of pointer motion in relation to the movement of flight controls. Technical Report 6016, Air Material Command, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH.
15. Gillespie, B., O'Modhrain, S., Tang, P., Pham, C., & Zaretsky, D. (1998). The virtual teacher. In Proceedings of the ASME 64, 171-178.
16. Hayward, V., & Astley, O. (1996). Performance measures for haptic interfaces. In Robotics Research: The 7th International Symposium, 195-207.
17. Hokayem, P., & Spong, M. (2006). Bilateral teleoperation: An historical survey. Automatica, 42(12), 2035-2057.
18. Insko, B. E. (2003). Measuring presence: Subjective, behavioral and physiological methods. In G. Riva, F. Davide, & W. A. IJsselsteijn (Eds.), Being there: Concepts, effects and measurement of user presence in synthetic environments. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.
19. Janssen, J., & Laatz, W. (2007). Statistische Datenanalyse mit SPSS für Windows (6th ed.). Berlin: Springer.
20. Keyrouz, F., & Diepold, K. (2007). Binaural source localization and spatial audio reproduction for telepresence applications. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, Special Issue on High Fidelity Telepresence II, 16, 509-522.
21. Leupold, J. (2006). Geometry compression with MPEG-4 BIFS in telepresence scenarios. In 2nd Workshop on Human Centered Robotic Systems (HCRS).
22. Liu, J., Cramer, S. C., & Reinkensmeyer, D. J. (2006). Learning to perform a new movement with robot assistance: Comparison of haptic guidance and visual demonstration. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 3(1), 20-30.
23. Marken, R. S. (1991). Degrees of freedom in behaviour. Psychological Science, 2(2), 92-100.
24. Masliah, L. E., & Milgram, P. (2000). Measuring the allocation of control in a 6 degree-of-freedom docking experiment. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 25-32.
25. Massimino, M. J., Sheridan, T. B., & Roseborough, J. B. (1989). One hand tracking in six degree of freedom. In IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 14-17.
26. McAffee, D., & Fiorini, P. (1991). Hand controller design requirements and performance issues in telerobotics. In Fifth International Conference on Advanced Robotics, Robots in Unstructured Environments, No. 1, 186-192.
27. Nash, E., Edwards, G., Thompson, J., & Barfield, W. (2000). A review of presence and performance in virtual environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 12(1), 1-41.
28. Ortmaier, T., Weiss, H., & Hirzinger, G. (2004). Telepresence and teleaction in minimally invasive surgery. In Proceedings of the Robotik 2004, VDI-Berichte 1841.Munich: VDI-Verlag.
29. Peer, A. (2008). Design and control of admittance-type telemanipulation system. PhD thesis, Technische Universität München.
30. Peer, A., & Buss, M. (2008). Robust stability analysis of a bilateral teleoperation system using the parameter space approach. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.
31. Psotka, J., Lewis, S., & King, D. (1998). Effects of field of view on judgments of self-location. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7(4), 352-369.
32. Reinhart, G., Clarke, S., Petzold, B., & Schilp, J. (2004). Telepresence as a solution to manual micro-assembly. CIRP Annals, 53(1), 21-24.
33. Reintsema, D., Landzettel, K., & Hirzinger, G. (2007). DLR's advanced telerobotic concepts and experiments for on-orbit servicing. In M. Ferre, M. Buss, R. Aracil, C. Melchiorri, & C. Balaguer (Eds.), Advances in Telerobotics: Human system interfaces, control, and applications (pp.324-345). Berlin: Springer.
34. Ridao, P., Carreras, M., Hernandez, E., & Palomeras, N. (2007). Underwater telerobotics for collaborative research. In M. Ferre, M. Buss, R. Aracil, C. Melchiorri, & C. Balaguer (Eds.), Advances in telerobotics: Human system interfaces, control, and applications (pp. 347-359). Berlin: Springer.
35. Rosenberg, L. B. (1993). The use of virtual fixtures to enhance telemanipulation with time delay. In Advances in robotics, mechatronics and haptic interfaces. ASME Winter Annual Meeting, DSC 49, 29-36.
36. Sadowski, W., & Stanney, K. (2002). Measuring and managing presence in virtual environments. In K. Stanney (Ed.), Handbook of virtual environments. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37. Scheuchenpflug, R. (2001). Measuring presence in virtual environments. In M. Smith, G. Salvendy, & M. Kasdorf (Eds.), HCI International 2001, 56-58.
38. Schilling, T. (Ed.). (1999). Telerobotic applications. New York: Wiley.
39. Senders, J. W., Christensen, J. M., & Sabeh, R. (1955). Comparison of single operator's performance with team performance in a tracking task. Technical Report TN-55-362, Aero Medical Laboratory, Wright Air Development Center.
40. Sheridan, T. B. (1992). Telerobotics, automation, and human supervisory control. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41. Shimoga, K. (1993). A survey of perceptual feedback issues in dexterous telemanipulation: Part I. Finger force feedback. In IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, 271-279.
42. Sitti, M., Aruk, B., Shintani, H., & Hashimoto, H. (2003). Scaled teleoperation system for nano-scale interaction and manipulation. Advanced Robotics, 17(3), 275-291.
43. Stanczyk, B. (2006). Development and control of an anthropomorphic teleoperator. PhD thesis, Technische Universität München, Lehrstuhl für Steuerungs- und Regelungstechnik.
44. Stanczyk, B., & Buss, M. (2004). Development of a telerobotic system for exploration of hazardous environments. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2532-2537.
45. Tang, W. K., Wong, T. T., & Heng, P. A. (2005). A system for real-time panorama generation and display in teleimmersive applications. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 7(2), 280-292.
46. Turvey, M. T., Fitch, H. L., & Tuller, B. (1982). The Bernstein perspective I. The problems of degrees of freedom and context-conditioned variability. In J. A. S. Kelso (Ed.), Human motor behavior. An introduction (pp. 239-252). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47. Tyler, C. W. (1983). Sensory processing of binocular disparity. In C. M. Schorr & K. J. Cinffreda (Eds.), Vergence eye movements: Basic and clinical aspects. Boston: Butterworths.
48. Ueberle, M., Mock, N., & Buss, M. (2007). Design, control, and evaluation of a hyper-redundant haptic interface. In M. Ferre, M. Buss, R. Aracil, C. Melchiorri, & C. Balaguer (Eds.), Advances in telerobotics: Human system interfaces, control, and applications. Berlin: Springer.
49. Ware, C., & Balakrishnan, R. (1994). Reaching for objects in VR displays: Lag and frame rate. Computer-Human Interaction, 1(4), 331-356.
50. Ware, C., & Rose, J. (1999). Rotating virtual objects with real handles. Computer-Human Interaction, 6(2), 162-180.
51. Witmer, B. G., & Singer, M. J. (1998). Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7(3), 225-240.
52. Zhai, S., & Milgram, P. (1998). Quantifying coordination in multiple DOF movement and its application to evaluating 6 DOF input devices. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 320-327.
53. Zhai, S., & Senders, J. W. (1997a). Investigating coordination in multidegree of freedom control I: Time-on-target analysis of 6 DOF tracking. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 41st Annual Meeting, 1249-1254.
54. Zhai, S., & Senders, J. W. (1997b). Investigating coordination in multidegree of freedom control II: Correlation analysis in 6 DOF tracking. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 41st Annual Meeting, 1254-1258.