Scripta manent? Assessing microbial risk to paper heritage

Trends in Microbiology

Volumn 18, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 538-542

  Cappitelli, Francesca ^a   Pasquariello, Giovanna ^b   Tarsitani, Gianfranco ^c   Sorlini, Claudia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^b Laboratorio di Biologia   (Italy)

^c SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELLULOSE;

CULTURE TECHNIQUE; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; ENVIRONMENTAL TEMPERATURE; HUMAN; HUMIDITY; MEMBRANE FILTER; MICROBIAL ACTIVITY; MICROBIAL COLONIZATION; MICROBIAL CONTAMINATION; MICROBIAL DEGRADATION; MICROFLORA; MICROORGANISM DETECTION; NONHUMAN; PAPER; PRESERVATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAMPLING; SHORT SURVEY;

CELLULOSE; CULTURE; ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY; LIBRARY MATERIALS; MICROBIOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES; PAPER;

EID: 78649322944     PISSN: 0966842X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2010.09.004     Document Type: Short Survey

References (34)

1. Cappitelli F., Sorlini C. Paper and Manuscripts. Cultural Heritage Microbiology: Fundamental Studies in Conservation Science 2010, 45-59. ASM Press. R. Mitchell, C. McNamara (Eds.).
2. Michaelsen A., et al. Molecular and microscopical investigation of the microflora inhabiting a deteriorated Italian manuscript dated from the thirteenth century. Microb. Ecol. 2010, 60:69-80.
3. Allsopp D., et al. Introduction to Biodeterioration 2004, Cambridge University Press. 2nd edn.
4. Montemartini Corte A., et al. Isolation of fungal species from test samples and maps damaged by foxing, and correlation between these species and the environment. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 2003, 51:167-173.
5. Zotti M., et al. Microfungal biodeterioration of historic paper: preliminary FTIR and microbiological analyses. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 2008, 62:186-194.
6. Mesquita N., et al. Fungal diversity in ancient documents. A case study on the Archive of the University of Coimbra. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 2009, 63:626-629.
7. Michaelsen A., et al. Biodeterioration and restoration of a 16th-century book using a combination of conventional and molecular techniques: a case study. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 2009, 63:161-168.
8. Piantanida G., et al. Atomic force microscopy applied to the study of Whatman paper surface deteriorated by a cellulolytic filamentous fungus. Macromol. Symp. 2006, 238:92-97.
9. Pepe O., et al. Heterotrophic microorganisms in deteriorated medieval wall paintings in southern Italian churches. Microbiol Res. 2010, 165:21-23.
10. Principi, P. et al. Molecular studies of microbial community structure on stained pages of Leonardo da Vinci's Atlantic Codex. Microb. Ecol. http://www.springerlink.com/content/100365.
11. Górny R.L., et al. Fungal fragments as indoor air biocontaminants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68:3522-3531.
12. Micali O., et al. Pathogenic microorganisms and situation of risk to man. Cultural Heritage and Aerobiology 2003, 31-43. Kluwer Academic Publishers. P. Mandrioli (Ed.).
13. Pinzari F., et al. Biodeterioration of paper: a SEM study of fungal spoilage reproduced under controlled conditions. Macromol. Symp. 2006, 238:57-66.
14. Mueller G.M., Schmit J.P. Fungal biodiversity: what do we know? What can we predict?. Biodivers. Conserv. 2007, 16:1-5.
15. Pietarinen V.-M., et al. Quantitative PCR analysis of fungi and bacteria in building materials and comparison to culture-based analysis. J. Environ. Monit. 2008, 10:655-663.
16. Smith C.J., Osborn A.M. Advantages and limitations of quantitative PCR(Q-PCR)-based approaches in microbial ecology. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2009, 67:6-20.
17. Villa F., et al. Permeabilization method for in-situ investigation of fungal conidia on surfaces. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2009, 48:234-240.
18. Di Bonaventura M.P., et al. Studies of fungal infestations of Tiffany's Drawings: limits and advantages of classical and molecular techniques. Art, Biology, and Conservation: Biodeterioration of Works of Art 2003, 94-109. Yale University Press. R.J. Koestler (Ed.).
19. Michaelsen A., et al. Application of molecular techniques for identification of fungal communities colonising paper material. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 2006, 58:133-141.
20. Reich M., et al. Development and validation of an oligonucleotide microarray to characterise ectomycorrhizal fungal communities. BMC Microbiol. 2009, 9:241.
21. Izzo A.D., Mazzola M. Hybridization of an ITS-based macroarray with ITS community probes for characterization of complex communities of fungi and fungal-like protists. Mycol. Res. 2009, 113:802-812.
22. Edwards P., et al. Isolation of fungal cellobiohydrolase I genes from sporocarps and forest soils by PCR. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74:3481-3489.
23. Favali M.A., et al. Analysis of the biological aerosol. Cultural Heritage and Aerobiology: Methods and Measurement Techniques for Biodeterioration Monitoring 2003, 145-172. Kluwer Academic Publishers. P. Mandrioli (Ed.).
24. MIBAC (2001) Atto di indirizzo sui criteri tecnico-scientifici e sugli standard di funzionamento e sviluppo dei musei, Ambito VI. D.Lgs. 112/1998 (art. 150, comma 6). Gazzetta Ufficiale 244 (Suppl.), 34-43.
25. Maggi O., et al. Airborn fungal spores in dust present in archives: proposal for a detection method new for archival materials. Aerobiologia 2000, 16:429-434.
26. Pinzari F., Montanari M. A substrate utilisation pattern (SUP) method for evaluating the biodeterioration. Conservation Science 2007 2008, 236-241. Archetype Publications. J.H. Townsend (Ed.).
27. Nehme B., et al. Culture-independent approach of the bacterial bioaerosol diversity in the standard swine confinement buildings, and assessment of the seasonal effect. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 10:665-675.
28. Brodie E.L., et al. Urban aerosols harbor diverse and dynamic bacterial populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:299-304.
29. Canhoto O., et al. Application of electronic nose technology for the detection of fungal contamination in library paper. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 2004, 54:303-309.
30. Schuchardt S., Kruse H. Quantitative volatile metabolite profiling of common indoor fungi: relevancy for indoor air analysis. J. Basic Microb. 2009, 49:350-362.
31. UNESCO (1956) General Conference Report, Ninth Session, New Delhi, Resolution 4.53, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0011/001145/114585e.pdf.
32. Valinsky L., et al. Oligonucleotide fingerprinting of rRNA genes for analysis of fungal community composition. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68:5999-6004.
33. Wu Z., et al. 18S rRNA gene variation among common airborne fungi, and development of specific oligonucleotide probes for the detection of fungal isolates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69:5389-5397.
34. Prigione V., Marchisio V.F. Methods to maximise the staining of fungal propagules with fluorescent dyes. J. Microbiol. Methods 2004, 59:371-379.