Diagnostic accuracy of different imaging modalities in detection of proximal caries

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 39, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 501-511

  Senel B ^a   Kamburoglu K ^a,b   Ucok O ^b   Yuksel S P ^a   Ozen T ^a   Avsever, H ^a  

^a GULHANE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Turkey)

^b ANKARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Cone beam computed tomography; Detection; Digital radiography; Film; Proximal caries

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL CARIES; EVALUATION; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; INSTRUMENTATION; MEDICAL PHOTOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEMICONDUCTOR; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

BICUSPID; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL CARIES; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MOLAR; OBSERVER VARIATION; PHOTOGRAPHY, DENTAL; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; REFERENCE STANDARDS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEMICONDUCTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 78649298106     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/28628723     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Pereira AC, Verdonschot EH, Huysmans MC. Caries detection methods: can they aid decision making for invasive sealant treatment? Caries Res 2001; 35: 83-89.
2. Attrill DC, Ashley PF. Occlusal caries detection in primary teeth: a comparison of DIAGNOdent with conventional methods. Br Dent J 2001; 190: 440-443.
3. Ohki M, Okano T, Nakamura T. Factors determining the diagnostic accuracy of digitized conventional intra-oral radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1994; 23: 77-82.
4. Haak R, Wicht MJ, Noack MJ. Conventional, digital and contrast-enhanced bite-wing radiographs in the decision to restore proximal carious lesions. Caries Res 2001; 35: 193-199.
5. Moystad A, Svanaes DB, Risnes S, Larheim TA, Gröndahl HG. Detection of proximal caries with a storage phosphor system. A comparison of enhanced digital images with dental x-ray film. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1996; 25: 202-206.
6. Tam LE, McComb D. Diagnosis of occlusal caries: Part II. Recent diagnostic technologies. J Can Dent Assoc 2001; 67: 459-463.
7. Kidd EA, Pitts NB. A reappraisal of the value of the bite-wing radiograph in the diagnosis of posterior proximal caries. Br Dent J 1990; 169: 195-200.
8. Svenson B, Gröndahl HG, Petersson A, Olving A. Accuracy of radiographic caries diagnosis at different kilovoltages and two film speeds. Swed Dent J 1985; 9: 37-43.
9. Hansen BF. Clinical and roentgenologic caries detection. A comparison. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1980; 9: 34-36.
10. Ludlow JB, Mol A. Digital imaging. In: White SC, Pharoah MJ (eds). Oral radiology. Principles and interpretation (6th edn). St Louis: Mosby, 2009, pp 78-99.
11. Kitagawa H, Scheetz JP, Farman AG. Comparison of complementary metal oxide semiconductor and charge-coupled device intra-oral X-ray detectors using subjective image quality. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003; 32: 408-411.
12. Farman AG, Farman TT. A comparison of 18 different x-ray detectors currently used in dentistry. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005; 99: 485-489.
13. Hildebolt CF, Couture RA, Whiting BR. Dental photostimulable phosphor radiography. Dent Clin North Am 2000; 44: 273-297.
14. Borg E, Attaelmanan A, Gröndahl HG. Image plate systems differ in physical performance. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000; 89: 118-124.
15. Tyndall DA, Rathore S. Cone-beam CT diagnostic applications: caries, periodontal bone assessment, and endodontic applications. Dent Clin North Am 2008; 52: 825-841.
16. Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc 2006; 72: 75-80.
17. Scarfe WC, Farman AG. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dent Clin North Am 2008; 52: 707-730.
18. White SC. Cone-beam imaging in dentistry. Health Physics 2008; 95: 628-637.
19. Holt RD, Azevedo MR. Fibre-optic transillumination and radiographs in diagnosis of proximal caries in primary teeth. Community Dent Health 1989; 6: 239-247.
20. Peers A, Hill FJ, Mitropoulos CM, Holloway PJ. Validity and reproducibility of clinical examination, fibre-optic transillumination, and bite-wing radiology for the diagnosis of small proximal carious lesions: an in vitro study. Caries Res 1993; 27: 307-311.
21. Naitoh M, Yuasa H, Toyama M, Shiojima M, Nakamura M, Ushida M, et al. Observer agreement in the detection of proximal caries with direct digital intra-oral radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998; 85: 107-112.
22. Abreu Júnior M, Tyndall DA, Platin E, Ludlow JB, Phillips C. Two-and three-dimensional imaging modalities for the detection of caries. A comparison between film, digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT). Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999; 28: 152-157.
23. Langlais RP, Skoczylas LJ, Prihoda TJ, Langland OE, Schiff T. Interpretation of bite-wing radiographs: application of kappa statistic to determine rater agreements. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1987; 64: 751-756.
24. Hintze H, Wenzel A, Danielsen B, Nyvad B. Reliability of visual examination, fibreoptic transillumination, and bite-wing radiography, and reproducibility of direct visual examination following tooth separation for the identification of cavitated carious lesions in contacting proximal surfaces 1998. Caries Res 32: 204-209.
25. Gröndahl HG, Gröndahl K, Okano T, Webber RL. Statistical contrast enhancement of subtraction images for radiographic caries diagnosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1982; 53: 219-223.
26. Wenzel A. Digital radiography and caries diagnosis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1988; 27: 3-11.
27. Tyndall DA, Ludlow JB, Platin E, Nair M. A comparison of Kodak Ektaspeed plus film and the Siemens Sidexis digital imaging system for caries detection using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998; 85: 113-118.
28. White SC, Yoon DC. Comparative performance of digital and conventional images for detecting proximal surfaces caries. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1997; 26: 32-38.
29. Castro VM, Katz JO, Hardman PK, Glaros AG, Spencer P. In vitro comparison of conventional film and direct digital imaging in the detection of proximal caries. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007; 36: 138-142.
30. Alkurt MT, Peker I, Bala O, Altunkaynak B. In vitro comparison of four different dental X-ray films and direct digital radiography for proximal caries detection. Oper Dent 2007; 32: 504-509.
31. Uprichard KK, Potter BJ, Russell CM, Schafer TE, Adair S, Weller RN. Comparison of direct digital and conventional radiography for the detection of proximal surface caries in the mixed dentition. Pediatr Dent 2000; 22: 9-15.
32. Price C, Ergül N. A comparison of a film-based and a direct digital dental radiographic system using a proximal caries model. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1997; 26: 45-52.
33. Hintze H, Wenzel A, Frydenberg M. Accuracy of caries detection with four storage phosphor systems and E-speed radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002; 31: 170-175.
34. Svanaes DB, Moystad A, Larheim TA. Proximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure. Caries Res 2000; 34: 448-453.
35. Syriopoulos K, Sanderink GC, Velders XL, van der Stelt PF. Radiographic detection of proximal caries: a comparison of dental films and digital imaging systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000; 29: 312-318.
36. Jacobsen JH, Hansen B, Wenzel A, Hintze H. Relationship between histological and radiographic caries lesion depth measured in images from four digital radiography systems. Caries Res 2004; 38: 34-38.
37. Haiter-Neto F, dos Anjos Pontual A, Frydenberg M, Wenzel A. A comparison of older and newer versions of intra-oral digital radiography systems: diagnosing noncavitated proximal carious lesions. J Am Dent Assoc 2007; 138: 1353-1359.
38. Peker I, Alkurt MT, Altunkaynak B. Film tomography compared with film and digital bitewing radiography for proximal caries detection. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007; 36: 495-499.
39. Kalathingal SM, Mol A, Tyndall DA, Caplan DJ. In vitro assessment of cone beam local computed tomography for proximal caries detection. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 104: 699-704.
40. Akdeniz BG, Gröndahl HG, Magnusson B. Accuracy of proximal caries depth measurements: comparison between limited cone beam computed tomography, storage phosphor and film radiography. Caries Res 2006; 40: 202-207.
41. Haiter-Neto F, Wenzel A, Gotfredsen E. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography scans compared with intra-oral image modalities for detection of caries lesions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008; 37: 18-22.
42. Tsuchida R, Araki K, Okano T. Evaluation of a limited conebeam volumetric imaging system: comparison with film radiography in detecting incipient proximal caries. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 104: 412-416.