Film tomography compared with film and digital bitewing radiography for proximal caries detection

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 36, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 495-499

  Peker, Ilkay ^a   Toraman Alkurt, M ^a   Altunkaynak, B ^a  

^a GAZI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Dental caries; Dental radiography; Receiver operating characteristic curve; Tomography

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DENTAL CARIES; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAXILLOFACIAL INJURY; RADIOLOGIST; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; ROC CURVE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STUDENT T TEST; TOMOGRAPHY; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; DENTAL CARIES; HUMANS; RADIOGRAPHY, BITEWING; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; ROC CURVE; TOMOGRAPHY; TOOTH;

EID: 37349010697     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/13319800     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. White SC, Atchison KA, Hewlett ER, Flack VF. Efficacy of FDA guidelines for ordering radiographs for caries detection. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994; 77: 531-540.
2. Moystad A, Svanaes DB, Risnes S, Larheim TA, Grondahl HG. Detection of approximal caries with a storage phosphor system. A comparison of enhanced digital images with dental x-ray film. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1996; 25: 202-206.
3. Wenzel A, Fejerskov O. Validity of diagnosis of questionable carious lesions in occlusal surfaces of extracted third molars. Caries Res 1992; 26: 188-194.
4. Wenzel A, Larsen MJ, Fejerskov O. Detection of occlusal caries without cavitation by visual inspection, film radiographs, xeroradiographs, and digitized radiographs. Caries Res 1991; 25: 365-371.
5. Beideman RW, Johnson ON, Alcox RW. A study to develop a rating system and evaluate dental radiographs submitted to a third party carrier. J Am Dent Assoc 1976; 93: 1010-1013.
6. Khan EA, Tyndall DA, Caplan D. Extraoral imaging for proximal caries detection: bitewings vs scanogram. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004; 98: 730-737.
7. Ahlqwist M, Halling A, Hollender L. Rotational panoramic radiography in epidemiological studies of dental health. Comparison between panoramic radiographs and intraoral full mouth surveys. Swed Dent J 1986; 10: 73-84.
8. Akkaya N, Kansu Ö, Kansu H, Cagirankaya LB, Arslan U. Comparing the accuracy of panoramic and intraoral radiography in the diagnosis of proximal caries. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006; 35: 170-174.
9. Clifton TL, Tyndall DA, Ludlow JB. Extraoral radiographic imaging of primary caries. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998; 27: 193-198.
10. Kaeppler G. Conventional cross-sectional tomographic evaluation of mandibular third molars. Quintessence Int 2000; 31: 49-56.
11. Kaeppler G. New radiographic programs for transverse conventional tomograms in the dentomaxillofacial region. Quintessence Int 1999; 30: 541-549.
12. Hintze H, Wenzel A, Frydenberg M. Accuracy of caries detection with four storage phosphor systems and E-speed radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002; 31: 170-175.
13. Hintze H, Wenzel A. Influence of the validation method on diagnostic accuracy for caries. A comparison of six digital and two conventional radiographic systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002; 31: 44-49.
14. Tyndall DA, Ludlow JB, Platin E, Nair M, Hill C. A comparison of Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film and Siemens Sidexis digital imaging system for caries detection using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998; 85: 113-118.
15. Syriopoulos K, Sanderink GC, Velders XL, van der Stelt PF. Radiographic detection of approximal caries: a comparison of dental films and digital imaging systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000; 29: 312-318.
16. Wenzel A, Pitts N, Verdonschot EH, Kalsbeek H. Developments in radiographic diagnosis. J Dent 1993; 21: 131-140.
17. Wenzel A. Current trends in radiographic caries imaging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995; 80: 527-539.
18. Shrout MK, Russell CM, Potter BJ, Powell BJ, Hildebolt CF. Digital enhancement of radiographs: can it improve caries diagnosis? J Am Dent Assoc 1996; 127: 469-473.
19. Ohki M, Okano T, Nakamura T. Factors determining the diagnostic accuracy of digitized conventional intraoral radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1994; 23: 77-82.
20. White SC, Yoon DC. Comparative performance of digital and conventional images for detecting proximal surface caries. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1997; 26: 32-38.
21. Naitoh M, Kawamata A, Iida H, Ariji E. Cross-sectional imaging of the jaws for dental implant treatment: accuracy of linear tomography using a panoramic machine in comparison with reformatted computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002; 17: 107-112.
22. Gijbels F, Jacobs R, Sanderink G, De Smet E, Nowak B, Van Dam J, et al. A comparison of the effective dose from scanography with periapical radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002; 31: 159-163.
23. Ekestubbe A, Thilander-Klang A, Lith A, Grondahl HG. Effective and organ doses from scanography and zonography: a comparison with periapical radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33: 87-92.
24. Benn DK. Radiographic caries diagnosis and monitoring. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1994; 23: 69-72.
25. Helfenstein U, Steiner M. The use of logistic discrimination and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis in dentistry. Community Dent Health 1994; 11: 142-146.
26. ten Bosch JJ, Angmar-Mansson B. Characterization and validation of diagnostic methods. Monogr Oral Sci 2000; 17: 174-189.
27. Verdonschot EH, Wenzel A, Bronkhorst EM. Applicability of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis on discrete caries depth ratings. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1993; 21: 269-272.
28. Henderson RA. Assessing test accuracy and its clinical consequences: a primer for receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Ann Clin Biochem 1993; 30: 521-539.
29. Syriopoulos K, Velders XL, Sanderink GCH, van Ginkel FC, van der Stelt PF. The effect of developer age on the detection of approximal caries using three dental films. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999; 28: 208-213.
30. Syriopoulos K, Sanderink GC, Velders XL, van Ginkel FC, van der Stelt PF. The effect of developer age on diagnostic accuracy: a study using assessment of endodontic file length. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999; 28: 311-315.