Inbreeding and advertisement calling in the cricket Teleogryllus commodus: Laboratory and field experiments

Evolution

Volumn 64, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 3069-3083

  Drayton, Jean M ^a   Milner, Richard N C ^a   Hunt, John ^b   Jennions, Michael D ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Call structure; Calling effort; Heterozygosity; Male attractiveness; Selection analysis; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; CRICKET; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FIELDWORK; HETEROZYGOSITY; INBREEDING; MATE ATTRACTION; MATE CHOICE; MATING SUCCESS; SEXUAL SELECTION; VOCALIZATION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; GRYLLIDAE; HETEROZYGOTE; INBREEDING; LABORATORY; MALE; MATE CHOICE; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; VOCALIZATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; FEMALE; GRYLLIDAE; HETEROZYGOTE; INBREEDING; LABORATORIES; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; RESEARCH DESIGN; SELECTION, GENETIC; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; VOCALIZATION, ANIMAL;

GRYLLIDAE; TELEOGRYLLUS COMMODUS;

EID: 78649248350     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01053.x     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Ala-Honkola, O., A. Uddström, B. Diaz Pauli, and K. Lindström. 2009. Strong inbreeding depression in male mating behaviour in a poeciliid fish. J. Evol. Biol. 22:1396-1406.
2. Armbruster, P., and D. H. Reed. 2005. Inbreeding depression in benign and stressful environments. Heredity 95:235-242.
3. Aspi, J. 2000. Inbreeding and outbreeding depression in male courtship song characters in Drosophila montana. Heredity 84:273-282.
4. Bentley, D. R., and R. R. Hoy. 1972. Genetic control of the neuronal network generating cricket (Teleogryllus gryllus) song patterns. Anim. Behav. 20:478-492.
5. Bentsen, C. L., J. Hunt, M. D. Jennions, and R. Brooks. 2006. Complex multivariate sexual selection on male acoustic signalling in a wild population of Teleogryllus commodus. Am. Nat. 167:E102-E116.
6. Bisgaard, S., and B. Ankenman. 1996. Standard errors for the eigenvalues in second-order response surface models. Technometrics 38:238-246.
7. Blows, M. W., and R. Brooks. 2003. Measuring nonlinear selection. Am. Nat. 162:815-820.
8. Blows, M. W., and A. A. Hoffmann. 2005. A reassessment of genetic limits to evolutionary change. Ecology 86:1371-1384.
9. Blows, M. W., R. Brooks, and P. G. Kraft. 2003. Exploring complex fitness surfaces: multiple ornamentation and polymorphism in male guppies. Evolution 57:1622-1630.
10. Brooks, R., J. Hunt, M. W. Blows, M. J. Smith, L. F. Bussiere, and M. D. Jennions. 2005. Experimental evidence for multivariate stabilizing sexual selection. Evolution 59:871-880.
11. Brown, J. L. 1997. A theory of mate choice based on heterozygosity. Behav. Ecol. 8:60-65.
12. Campbell, D. J., and E. Shipp. 1979. Regulation of spatial pattern in populations of the field cricket Teleogryllus commodus (Walker). Z. Tierpsychol. 51:260-268.
13. Charlesworth, B., and D. Charlesworth. 1999. The genetic basis of inbreeding depression. Genet. Res. 74:329-340.
14. Charlesworth, B., and D. Charlesworth. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18:237-268.
15. Chenoweth, S. F., and M. W. Blows. 2005. Contrasting mutual sexual selection on homologous signal traits in Drosophila serrata. Am. Nat. 165:281-289.
16. Cooper, H., L. V. Hedges, and J. C. Valentine, eds. 2009. The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis. Russell Sage Foundation Publications, New York.
17. Cotton, S., K. Fowler, and A. Pomiankowski. 2004. Do sexual ornaments demonstrate heightened condition-dependent expression as predicted by the handicap hypothesis? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271:771-783.
18. Crawley, M. J. 2002. Statistical Computing: an introduction to data-analysis using S-Plus. Wiley, Chichester, England.
19. Crnokrak, P., and D. A. Roff. 1999. Inbreeding depression in the wild. Heredity 83:260-270.
20. Crnokrak, P., and D. A. Roff. 1995. Fitness differences associated with calling behaviour in the two wing morphs of male sand crickets, Gryllus firmus. Anim. Behav. 50:1475-1481.
21. DeRose, M. A., and D. A. Roff. 1999. A comparison of inbreeding depression in life-history and morphological traits in animals. Evolution 53:1288-1292.
22. Draper, N. R., and J. A. John. 1988. Response-surface designs for quantitative and qualitative variables. Technometrics 30:423-428.
23. Drayton, J. M., J. Hunt, R. Brooks, and M. D. Jennions. 2007. Sounds different: inbreeding depression in sexually selected traits in the cricket Teleogryllus commodus. J. Evol. Biol. 20:1138-1147.
24. Evans, A. R. 1988. Mating systems and reproductive strategies in three Australian gryllid crickets: Bobilla victoriae Otte, Balamara gidya Otte and Telleogryllus commodus (Walker) (Orthoptera; Gryllidae; Nemobiinae; Trigonidiinae; Gryllinae). Ethology 78:21-52.
25. French, B. W., and W. H. Cade. 1989. Sexual selection at varying population densities in male field crickets, Gryllus veletis and G. pennsylvanicus. J. Insect Behav. 2:105-121.
26. Fromhage, L., H. Kokko, and J. M. Reid. 2009. Evolution of mate choice for genome-wide heterozygosity. Evolution 63:684-694.
27. Gage,M.J.G.,A.K.Surridge,J.L.Tomkins,E.Green,L.Wiskin, D. J. Bell, and G. M. Hewitt. 2006. Reduced heterozygosity depressed sperm quality in wild rabbits, Oryctolagus cuniculus. Curr. Biol. 16:612-617.
28. Gray, D. A., and G. Eckhardt. 2001. Is cricket courtship song condition dependent? Anim. Behav. 62:871-877.
29. Green, P. J., and B. W. Silverman. 1994. Nonparametic regression and generalised linear models. Chapman and Hall, London.
30. Hack, M. A. 1998. The energetics of male mating strategies in field crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllinae: Gryllidae). J. Insect Behav. 11:853-867.
31. Hall, M. D., L. F. Bussiere, J. Hunt, and R. Brooks. 2008. Experimental evidence that sexual conflict influences the opportunity, form and intensity of sexual selection. Evolution 62:2305-2315.
32. Hedrick, A. 2005. Environmental condition-dependent effects on a heritable, preferred male trait. Anim. Behav. 70:1121-1124.
33. Hedrick, A. V. 1986. Female preferences for male calling bout duration in a field cricket. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 19:73-77.
34. Hill, K. G., J. J. Loftus-Hills, and D. F. Gartside. 1972. Pre-mating isolation between the Australian field crickets Teleogryllus commodus and T. oceanicus (Othoptera: Gryllidae). Aust. J. Zool. 20:153-163.
35. Holzer, B., A. Jacot, and M. W. G. Brinkhof. 2003. Condition-dependent signalling affects male sexual attractiveness in field crickets, Gryllus campestris. Behav. Ecol. 14:353-359.
36. Hunt, J., M. W. Blows, F. Zajitschek, M. D. Jennions, and R. Brooks. 2007. Reconciling strong stabilizing selection with the maintenance of genetic variation in a natural population of black field crickets (Teleogryllus commodus). Genetics 177:875-880.
37. Hunt, J., L. Bussiere, M. D. Jennions, and R. C. Brooks. 2004a. What is genetic quality? Trends Ecol. Evol. 19:329-333.
38. Hunt, J., R. Brooks, M. D. Jennions, M. J. Smith, C. L. Bentsen, and L. F. Bussiere. 2004b. High-quality male field crickets invest heavily in sexual display but die young. Nature 432:1024-1027.
39. Ilmonen, P., G. Stundner, M. Thoß, and D. J. Penn. 2009. Females prefer the scent of outbred males: good-genes-as-heterozygosity? BMC Evol. Biol. 9:104.
40. Joron, M., and P. M. Brakefield. 2003. Captivity masks inbreeding effects on male mating success in butterflies. Nature 424:191-194.
41. Judge, K. A., J. J. Ting, and D. T. Gwynne. 2008. Condition dependence of male life span and calling effort in a field cricket. Evolution 62:868-878.
42. Kavanagh, M. W. 1987. The efficiency of sound production in two cricket species, Gryllotalpa australis and Teleogryllus commodus (Orthoptera, Grylloidea). J. Exp. Biol. 130:107-119.
43. Keller, L. F., and D. M. Waller. 2002. Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:230-241.
44. Kempenaers, B. 2007. Mate choice and genetic quality: a review of the heterozygosity theory. Adv. Study Behav. 37:189-278.
45. Konior, M., L. Keller, and J. Radwan. 2005. Effect of inbreeding and heritability of sperm competition success in the bulb mite Rhizoglyphus robini. Heredity 94:577-581.
46. Lande, R., and S. J. Arnold. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:1210-1226.
47. Lande, R., and D. W. Schemske. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilisation and inbreeding depression in plants. 1. Genetic models. Evolution 39:24-40.
48. Lynch, M., and B. Walsh. 1998. Genetics and the analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
49. Manly, B. F. J. 1997. Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology. Chapman and Hall, London.
50. Maklakov, A. A., S. J. Simpson, F. Zajitschek, M. D. Hall, J. Dessmann, F. Clissold, D. Raubenheimer, R. Bonduriansky, and R. C. Brooks. 2008. Sex-specific fitness effects of nutrient intake on reproduction and lifespan. Curr. Biol. 18:1062-1066.
51. Mariette, M., J. L. Kelley, R. Brooks, and J. P. Evans. 2006. The effects of inbreeding on male courtship behaviour and coloration in guppies. Ethology 112:807-814.
52. Margulis, S. W., and A. Walsh. 2002. The effects of inbreeding on testicular sperm concentration in Peromyscus polionotus. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 14:63-67.
53. Mays, H. L., and G. E. Hill. 2004. Choosing mates: good genes versus genes that are a good fit. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19:554-559.
54. Miller, P. S., J. Glasner, and P. W. Hedrick. 1993. Inbreeding depression and male mating behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetica 88:29-36.
55. Mitchell-Olds, T., and R. G. Shaw. 1987. Regression analysis of natural selection: statistical inference and biological interpretation. Evolution 41:1149-1161.
56. Mitton, J. B., W. S. F. Schuster, E. G. Cothran, and J. C. Defries. 1993. Correlation between the individual heterozygosity of parents and their offspring. Heredity 71:59-63.
57. Mousseau, T. A., and D. A. Roff. 1987. Natural selection and the heritability of fitness components. Heredity 59:181-197.
58. Phillips, P. C., and S. J. Arnold. 1989. Visualising multivariate selection. Evolution 43:1209-1222.
59. Prestwich, K. N., and T. J. Walker. 1981. Energetics of singing in crickets: effect of temperature in three trilling species (Orthoptera, Gryllidae). J. Comp. Physiol. B 143:199-212.
60. Puurtinen, M., T. Ketola, and J. S. Kotiaho. 2009. The good-genes and compatible-genes benefits of mate choice. Am. Nat. 174:741-752.
61. Radwan, J. 2008. Maintenance of genetic variation in sexual ornaments: a review of the mechanisms. Genetica 134:113-127.
62. Rantala, M. J., and D. A. Roff. 2007. Inbreeding and extreme outbreeding cause sex differences in immune defence and life history traits in Epirrita autumnata. Heredity 98:329-336.
63. Reid, J. M., P. Arcese, and L. K. Keller, 2006. Intrinsic parent-offspring correlation in inbreeding level in a song sparrow (Melospiza melodia) population open to immigration. Am. Nat. 168:1-13.
64. Roff, D. A. 1998. Effects of inbreeding on morphological and life history traits of the sand cricket, Gryllus firmus. Heredity 81:28-37.
65. Roldan, E. R. S., J. Cassinello, T. Abaigar, and M. Gomendio. 1998. Inbreeding, fluctuating asymmetry, and ejaculate quality in an endangered ungulate. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265:243-248.
66. Rosenberg, M. S., D. C. Adams, and J. Gurevitch. 2000. MetaWin. Statistical software for meta-analysis. Version 2.0. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
67. Rotenberry, J. T., M. Zuk, L. W. Simmons, and C. Hayes. 1996. Phonotactic parasitiods and cricket song structure: an evaluation of alternative hypotheses. Evol. Ecol. 10:233-243.
68. Rowe, L., and D. Houle. 1996. The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263:1415-1421.
69. Scheuber, H., A. Jacot, and M. W. G. Brinkhof. 2003. Condition dependence of a multicomponent sexual signal in the field cricket Gryllus campestris. Anim. Behav. 65:721-727.
70. Sharp, P. M. 1984. The effect of inbreeding on competitive male-mating ability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 106:601-612.
71. Sheridan, L., and A. Pomiankowski. 1997. Fluctuating asymmetry, spot asymmetry and inbreeding depression in the sexual coloration of male guppy fish. Heredity 79:515-523.
72. Stinchcombe, J. R., A. F. Agrawal, P. A. Hohenlohe, S. J. Arnold, and M. W. Blows. 2008. Estimating non-linear selection gradients using quadratic regression coefficients: double or nothing? Evolution 62:2435-2440.
73. Tomkins, J. L., J. Radwan, J. S. Kotiaho, and T. Tregenza. 2004. Genic capture and resolving the lek paradox. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19:323-328.
74. Tregenza, T., L. W. Simmons, N. Wedell, and M. Zuk. 2006. Female preference for male courtship song and its role as a signal of immune function and condition. Anim. Behav. 72:809-818.
75. van Oosterhout, C., R. E. Trigg, G. R. Carvalho, A. E. Magurran, L. Hauser, and P. W. Shaw. 2003. Inbreeding depression and genetic load of sexually selected traits: how the guppy lost its spots. J. Evol. Biol. 16:273-281.
76. Wagner, W. E. Jr., and W. Hoback. 1999. Nutritional effects on male calling behaviour in the variable field cricket. Anim. Behav. 57:89-95.
77. Wagner, W. E. Jr., and M. G. Reiser. 2000. The importance of calling song and courtship song in female mate choice in the variable field cricket. Anim. Behav. 59:1219-1226.
78. Zajitschek, S. R. K., A. K. Lindholm, J. P. Evans, and R. C. Brooks. 2009. Experimental evidence that high levels of inbreeding depress sperm competitiveness. J. Evol. Biol. 22:1338-1345.
79. Zuk, M., L. W. Simmons, and L. Cupp. 1993. Calling characteristics of parasitized and unparasitized populations of the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 33:339-343.