Inbreeding and outbreeding depression in male courtship song characters in Drosophila montana

Heredity

Volumn 84, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 273-282

  Aspi, Jouni ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Courtship song; Epistasis; Interpopulation hybrids; Shifting balance theory

Indexed keywords

COURTSHIP; CROSSING; DOMINANT INHERITANCE; EPISTASIS; INBRED STRAIN; INBREEDING; OUTBREEDING;

COURTSHIP; FLY; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; MATING SUCCESS; SONG; SURVIVAL;

ANIMAL COMMUNICATION; ANIMALS; CROSSES, GENETIC; DROSOPHILA; EPISTASIS, GENETIC; FEMALE; INBREEDING; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

DIPTERA; DROSOPHILA MONTANA;

EID: 0034053979     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00655.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. ASPI, J. AND HOIKKALA, A. 1993. Laboratory and natural heritabilities of male courtship song characters in Drosophila montana and D. littoralis. Heredity, 70, 400-406.
2. ASPI, J. AND HOIKKALA, A. 1995. Male mating success and survival in the field with respect to size and courtship song characters in Drosophila littoralis and D. montana (Diptera: Drosophilidae). J. Insect Behav., 8, 67-87.
3. BLOWS, M. W. 1994. The genetics of central and marginal populations of Drosophila serrata. II. Hybrid breakdown in fitness components as a correlated response to selection for desiccation resistance. Evolution, 47, 1271-1285.
4. CHARLESWORTH, B. 1998. The effect of synergistic epistasis on the inbreeding load. Genet. Res., 71, 85-89.
5. CHEVRUD, J. M. AND ROUTMAN, E. R. 1996a. Epistasis and its contribution to genetic variance components. Genetics, 139, 1455-1461.
6. CHEVRUD, J. M. AND ROUTMAN, E. R. 1996b. Epistasis as a source of increased additive genetic variance at population bottlenecks. Evolution, 50, 1042-1051.
7. COYNE, J. A., BARTON, N. H. AND TURELLI, M. 1997. Perspective: a critique of Sewall Wright's shifting balance theory. Evolution, 51, 643-671.
8. DE BELLE, J. S. AND SOKOLOWSKI, M. B. 1987. Heredity of rover/sitter: alternative foraging strategies of Drosophila melanogaster larvae. Heredity, 59, 73-83.
9. DE ROSE, M. A. AND ROFF, D. A. 1999. A comparison of inbreeding depression in life-history and morphological traits in animals. Evolution, 53, 1288-1292.
10. FALCONER, D. S. 1985. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 2nd edn. Longman, London.
11. GAVRILETS, S. 1996. On phase three of the shifting balance theory. Evolution, 50, 1034-1041.
12. HARD, J. J., BRADSHAW, W. E. AND HOLZAPFEL, M. 1992. Epistasis and the genetic divergence of photoperiodism between populations of the pitcher-plant mosquito, Wyeomyia smithii. Genetics, 131, 389-396.
13. HAYMAN, B. I. 1960. Maximum likelihood estimation of genetic components of variation. Biometrics, 16, 369-381.
14. HEMMAT, M. AND EGGLESTON, P. 1990. The biometrical genetics of competitive parameters in Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity, 64, 223-231.
15. HOIKKALA, A., ASPI, J. AND SUVANTO, L. 1998. Male courtship song frequency as an indicator of male genetic quality in an insect species, Drosophila montana. Proc. R. Soc. B, 265, 503-508.
16. KEARSEY, M. J. AND POONI, H. S. 1996. The Genetical Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Chapman & Hall, London.
17. LIIMATAINEN, J. O. AND HOIKKALA, A. 1998. Interactions of the males and females of three sympatric Drosophila virilis-group species, D. montana, D. littoralis and D. lummei (Diptera, Drosophilidae) in intra- and interspecific courtships in the wild and in the laboratory. J. Insect Behav., 11, 399-417.
18. LYNCH, M. 1991. The genetic interpretation of inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression. Evolution, 45, 622-629.
19. LYNCH, M. AND WALSH B. 1998. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
20. MATHER, K. AND JINKS, J. L. 1982. Biometrical Genetics, 3rd edn. Chapman & Hall, London.
21. MILLER, P. S., GLASNER, J. AND HEDRICK, P. W. 1993. Inbreeding depression and male-mating behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetica, 88, 29-36.
22. MORENO, G. 1994. Genetic architecture, genetic behavior, and character evolution. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 25, 31-44.
23. RITCHIE, M. G., TOWNHILL, R. M. AND HOIKKALA, A. 1998. Female preference for fly song: playback experiments confirm the targets of sexual selection. Anim. Behav., 56, 713-717.
24. SOKAL, R. R. AND ROHLF, F. J. 1969. Biometry, 2nd edn. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, CA.
25. THORNHILL, N. W. (ed.) 1993. The Natural History of Inbreeding and Outbreeding. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
26. THROCKMORTON, L. H. 1982. The virilis species group. In: Ashburner, M., Carson, H. L. and Thompson, J. N. Jr (eds) The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, vol. 3B, pp. 221-239. Academic Press, London.
27. WADE, M. J. AND GOODNIGHT, C. J. 1998. Perspective: the theories of Fisher and Wright in the context of metapopulations: when nature does many small experiments. Evolution, 52, 1537-1553.
28. WILLIS, J. H. AND ORR, A. H. 1993. Increased heritable variation following bottlenecks: the role of dominance variance. Evolution, 47, 949-956.
29. WRIGHT, S. 1968. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, vol. 1: Genetic and Biometric Foundations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
30. WRIGHT, S. 1969. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, vol. 2, The Theory of Gene Frequencies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
31. WRIGHT, S. 1977. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, vol. 3: Experimental Results and Evolutionary Deductions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
32. WU, W. R. AND PALOPOLI, M. F. 1994. Genetics of postmating reproductive isolation in animals. Ann. Rev. Genet, 28, 283-308.