Early biases and developmental changes in self-generated object views

Journal of Vision

Volumn 10, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 1-13

  Pereira, Alfredo F ^a   James, Karin H ^a   Jones, Susan S ^a   Smith, Linda B ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Active object inspection; Viewpoint selection; Visual object recognition

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; FOREHEAD; HUMAN; INFANT; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; SELF CONCEPT; STATISTICAL BIAS;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; FOREHEAD; HUMANS; INFANT; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; SELF CONCEPT;

EID: 78449264664     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/10.11.22     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Abecassis, M., Sera, M. D., Yonas, A., & Schwade, J. (2001). What's in a shape? Children represent shape variability differently than adults when naming objects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 78, 213-239.
2. Aslin, R. N. (2009). How infants view natural scenes gathered from a head-mounted camera. Optometry and Vision Science, 86, 561-565.
3. Barenholtz, E., & Tarr, M. J. (2007). Reconsidering the role of structure in vision. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 47, 157-180.
4. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-117.
5. Blanz, V., Tarr, M. J., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1999). What object attributes determine canonical views? Perception, 28, 575-599.
6. Boutsen, L., Lamberts, K., & Verfaillie, K. (1998). Recognition times of different views of 56 depthrotated objects: A note concerning Verfaillie and Boutsen (1995). Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 900-907.
7. Bülthoff, H. H., & Edelman, S. (1992). Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 89, 60-64.
8. Bushnell, E. W., & Boudreau, J. P. (1993). Motor development and the mind: The potential role of motor abilities as a determinant of aspects of perceptual development. Child Development, 64, 1005-1021.
9. Cutzu, F., & Tarr, M. J. (2007). Representation of threedimensional object similarity in human vision. Paper presented at the SPIE Electronic Imaging: Human Vision and Electronic Imaging II, San Jose, CA.
10. Doumas, L. A. A., & Hummel, J. E. (2010). A computational account of the development of the generalization of shape information. Cognitive Science, 34, 698-712.
11. Graf, M. (2006). Coordinate transformations in object recognition. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 920.
12. Harman, K. L., Humphrey, G. K., & Goodale, M. A. (1999). Active manual control of object views facilitates visual recognition. Current Biology, 9, 1315-1318.
13. Harries, M. H., Perrett, D. I., & Lavender, A. (1991). Preferential inspection of views of 3-D model heads. Perception, 20, 669-680.
14. Hummel, J. E. (2000). Where view-based theories break down: The role of structure in human shape perception. In E. Dietrich & A. B. Markman (Eds.), Cognitive dynamics: Conceptual and representational change in humans and machines (pp. 157-185). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
15. Hummel, J. E., & Biederman, I. (1992). Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychological Review, 99, 480-517.
16. James, K. H., Humphrey, G. K., & Goodale, M. A. (2001). Manipulating and recognizing virtual objects: Where the action is. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 111-120.
17. James, K. H., Humphrey, G. K., Vilis, T., Corrie, B., Baddour, R., & Goodale, M. A. (2002). "Active" and "passive" learning of three-dimensional object structure within an immersive virtual reality environment. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 34, 383-390.
18. Johnson, S. P. (2001). Visual development in human infants: Binding features, surfaces, and objects. Visual Cognition, 8, 565-578.
19. Johnson, S. P., Amso, D., & Slemmer, J. A. (2003). Development of object concepts in infancy: Evidence for early learning in an eye tracking paradigm. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 10568-10573.
20. Jones, S. S., & Smith, L. B. (2005). Object name learning and object perception: A deficit in late talkers. Journal of Child Language, 32, 223-240.
21. Keehner, M., Hegarty, M., Cohen, C., Khooshabeh, P., & Montello, D. R. (2008). Spatial reasoning with external visualizations: What matters is what you see, not whether you interact. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 32, 1099-1132.
22. Kuipers, J. B. (2002). Quaternions and rotation sequences: A primer with applications to orbits, aerospace, and virtual reality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23. Landau, B., Hoffman, J. E., & Kurz, N. (2006). Object recognition with severe spatial deficits in Williams syndrome: Sparing and breakdown. Cognition, 100, 483-510.
24. Locher, P., Vos, A., Stappers, P. J., & Overbeeke, K. (2000). A system for investigating 3-D form perception. Acta Psychologica, 104, 17-27.
25. Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. New York, NY, USA: Henry Holt and Co., Inc.
26. Marr, D., & Nishihara, H. K. (1978). Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of threedimensional shapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 269-294.
27. Mash, C. (2006). Multidimensional shape similarity in the development of visual object classification. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 95, 128-152.
28. Moore, D. S., & Johnson, S. P. (2008). Mental rotation in human infants: A sex difference. Psychological Science, 19, 1063-1066.
29. Niemann, T., Lappe, M., & Hoffmann, K. P. (1996). Visual inspection of three-dimensional objects by human observers. Perception, 25, 1027-1042.
30. Ornkloo, H., & von Hofsten, C. (2007). Fitting objects into holes: On the development of spatial cognition skills. Developmental Psychology, 43, 404-415.
31. Palmer, S., Rosch, E., & Chase, P. (1981). Canonical perspective and the perception of objects. Paper presented at the Attention and Performance IX: Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Attention and Performance, Jesus College, Cambridge, England.
32. Palmeri, T. J., & Gauthier, I. (2004). Visual object understanding. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 291-303.
33. Peissig, J. J., & Tarr, M. J. (2007). Visual object recognition: Do we know more now than we did 20 years ago? Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 75-96.
34. Pereira, A. F., & Smith, L. B. (2009). Developmental changes in visual object recognition between 18 and 24 months of age. Developmental Science, 12, 67-80.
35. Perrett, D. I., & Harries, M. H. (1988). Characteristic views and the visual inspection of simple faceted and smooth objects: "Tetrahedra and potatoes." Perception, 17, 703-720.
36. Perrett, D. I., Harries, M. H., & Looker, S. (1992). Use of preferential inspection to define the viewing sphere and characteristic views of an arbitrary machined tool part. Perception, 21, 497-497.
37. Peterson, M. A. (2001). Object perception. In E. B. Goldstein (Ed.), Blackwell handbook of perception (pp. 168-203). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
38. Picard, D., & Durand, K. (2005). Are young children's drawings canonically biased? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 90, 48-64.
39. Quinn, P. C. (2004). Development of subordinate-level categorization in 3- to 7-month-old infants. Child Development, 75, 886-899.
40. Rakison, D. H., & Butterworth, G. E. (1998). Infants' use of object parts in early categorization. Developmental Psychology, 34, 49-62.
41. Riesenhuber, M., & Poggio, T. (1999). Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 1019-1025.
42. Rock, I. (1973). Orientation and form. New York: Academic Press.
43. Rosch, E., Simpson, C., & Miller, R. S. (1976). Structural bases of typicality effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 491-502.
44. Ruff, H. A., & Saltarelli, L. M. (1993). Exploratory play with objects: Basic cognitive processes and individual differences. In M. H. Bornstein & A. W. O'Reilly (Eds.), The role of play in the development of thought. New directions for child development, No. 59: The Jossey-Bass education series (pp. 5-16). San Francisco, CA, US: Jossey-Bass.
45. Ruff, H. A., Saltarelli, L. M., Capozzoli, M., & Dubiner, K. (1992). The differentiation of activity in infants' exploration of objects. Developmental Psychology, 28, 851-861.
46. Savarese, S., & Fei-Fei, L. (2007). 3D generic object categorization, localization and pose estimation. Paper presented at the IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision.
47. Shen, H., Baker, T., Candy, R., Yu, C., & Smith, L. B. (in preparation). Head and eye stabilization during reaching by toddlers.
48. Shuwairi, S. M., Albert, M. K., & Johnson, S. P. (2007). Discrimination of possible and impossible objects in infancy. Psychological Science, 18, 303-307.
49. Smith, L. B. (1999). Children's noun learning: How general learning processes make specialized learning mechanisms. Emergence of Language, 277-303.
50. Smith, L. B. (2003). Learning to recognize objects. Psychological Science, 14, 244-250.
51. Smith, L. B. (2009). From fragments to geometric shape. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 290-294.
52. Smith, L. B., & Pereira, A. F. (2009). Shape, action, symbolic play, and words: Overlapping loops of cause and consequence in developmental process. In S. P. Johnson (Ed.), A neo-constructivist approach to early development. New York: Oxford University Press.
53. Smith, L. B., Yu, C., & Pereira, A. F. (2010). Not your mother's view: The dynamics of toddler visual experience. Developmental Science, in press.
54. Son, J. Y., Smith, L. B., & Goldstone, R. L. (2008). Simplicity and generalization: Short-cutting abstraction in children's object categorizations. Cognition, 108, 626-638.
55. Soska, K. C., Adolph, K. E., & Johnson, S. P. (2010). Systems in development: Motor skill acquisition facilitates 3D object completion. Developmental Psychology, 46, 129-138.
56. Soska, K. C., & Johnson, S. P. (2008). Development of three-dimensional object completion in infancy. Child Development, 79, 1230.
57. Street, S. Y., James, K. H., Jones, S. S., & Smith, L. B. (in press). Toward an understanding of coordinated dorsal and ventral stream functions: Vision for action in toddlers. Child Development.
58. Tarr, M. J., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1995). Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1494-1505.
59. Tarr, M. J., & Vuong, Q. C. (2002). Visual object recognition. In H. Pashler & S. Yantis (Eds.), Steven's handbook of experimental psychology (3rd ed.), Vol. 1: Sensation and perception (pp. 287-314). Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
60. Tarr, M. J., Williams, P., Hayward, W. G., & Gauthier, I. (1998). Three-dimensional object recognition is viewpoint dependent. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 275-277.
61. Ullman, S. (2007). Object recognition and segmentation by a fragment-based hierarchy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 58-64.
62. Ullman, S., Vidal-Naquet, M., & Sali, E. (2002). Visual features of intermediate complexity and their use on classification. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 682-687.
63. Xu, C., & Kuipers, B. (2009). Construction of the object semantic hierarchy. Paper presented at the Fifth International Cognitive Vision Workshop (ICVW 2009).
64. Yoshida, H., & Smith, L. B. (2008). What's in view for toddlers? Using a head camera to study visual experience. Infancy, 13, 229-248.