Recognition times of different views of 56 depth-rotated objects: A note concerning Verfaillie and Boutsen (1995)

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 60, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 900-907

  Boutsen, Luc ^a,c   Lamberts, Koen ^a   Verfaillie, Karl ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^c UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; ROTATION;

FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; ROTATION;

EID: 0032109525     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/bf03206072     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. BIEDERMAN, I., & GERHARDSTEIN, P. C. (1993). Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 1162-1182.
2. BÜLTHOFF, H. H., & EDELMAN, S. (1992). Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 89, 60-64.
3. BÜLTHOFF, H. H., EDELMAN, S. Y., & TARR, M. J. (1995). How are three-dimensional objects represented in the brain? Cerebral Cortex, 5, 247-260.
4. CUTZU, F., & EDELMAN, S. (1994). Canonical views in object representation and recognition. Vision Research, 34, 3037-3056.
5. EDELMAN, S., & BÜLTHOFF, H. H. (1992). Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of 3D objects. Vision Research, 32, 2385-2400.
6. FREEMAN, W. T. (1994). The generic view assumption in a framework for visual perception. Nature, 368, 542-545.
7. FREEMAN, W. T. (1996). Exploiting the generic viewpoint assumption. International Journal of Computer Vision, 20, 243-261.
8. HUMPHREYS, G. W., & QUINLAN, P. T. (1987). Normal and pathological processes in visual object constancy. In G. W. Humphreys & M. J. Riddoch (Eds.), Visual object processing: A cognitive neuropsychological approach (pp. 43-105). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. HUMPHREYS, G. W., & RIDDOCH, M. J. (1984). Routes to object constancy: Implications from neurological impairments of object constancy. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A, 385-415.
10. HUMPHREYS, G. W., & RIDDOCH, M. J. (1985). Authors' correction to "Routes to object constancy." Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 493-495.
11. LAWSON, R., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1996). View specificity in object processing: Evidence from picture matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 395-416.
12. LOGOTHETIS, N. K., & SHEINBERG, D. L. (1996). Visual object recognition. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 19, 577-621.
13. PALMER, S., ROSCH, E., & CHASE, P. (1981). Canonical perspective and the perception of objects. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 135-151). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. PERRETT, D. I., ORAM, M. W., HIETANEN, J. K., & BENSON, P. J. (1994). Issues of representation in object vision. In M. J. Farah & G. Ratcliff (Eds.), The neuropsychology of high-level vision (pp. 33-61). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. POGGIO, T., & EDELMAN, S. (1990). A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects. Nature, 343, 263-266.
16. SRINIVAS, K. (1993). Perceptual specificity in nonverbal priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 582-602.
17. SRINIVAS, K. (1995). Representation of rotated objects in explicit and implicit memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 1019-1036.
18. TARR, M. J. (1995). Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 55-82.
19. TARR, M. J., & PINKER, S. (1989). Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 233-282.
20. VERFAILLIE, K. (1992). Variant points of view on viewpoint invariance. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 215-235.
21. VERFAILLIE, K. (1993). Orientation-dependent priming effects in the perception of biological motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 992-1013.
22. VERFAILLIE, K., & BOUTSEN, L. (1995). A corpus of 714 full-color images of depth-rotated objects. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 925-961.
23. WEINSHALL, D., WERMAN, M., & TISHBY, N. (1996). Stability and likelihood of views of three-dimensional objects. Computing Supplementum, 11, 237-256.