Evolution of care of patients needing a total knee replacement;Évolution de la prise en charge des patients nécessitant une prothèse totale de genou

Presse Medicale

Volumn 39, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 1189-1194

  Nizard, Rémy ^a  

^a HÔPITAL LARIBOISIÈRE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; HUMAN; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; REHABILITATION; SHORT SURVEY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; HUMANS; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION;

EID: 78449245793     PISSN: 07554982     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lpm.2010.01.016     Document Type: Short Survey

References (35)

1. Hawker G.A., Badley E.M., Croxford R., Coyte P.C., Glazier R.H., Guan J., et al. A population-based nested case-control study of the costs of hip and knee replacement surgery. Med Care 2009, 47:732-741.
2. Khatod M., Inacio M., Paxton E.W., Bini S.A., Namba R.S., Burchette R.J., et al. Knee replacement: epidemiology, outcomes, and trends in Southern California: 17,080 replacements from 1995 through 2004. Acta Orthop 2008, 79:812-819.
3. Kim H.A., Kim S., Seo Y.I., Choi H.J., Seong S.C., Song Y.W., et al. The epidemiology of total knee replacement in South Korea: national registry data. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2008, 47:88-91.
4. Iorio R., Robb W.J., Healy W.L., Berry D.J., Hozack W.J., Kyle R.F., et al. Orthopaedic surgeon workforce and volume assessment for total hip and knee replacement in the United States: preparing for an epidemic. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2008, 90:1598-1605.
5. Jüni P., Dieppe P., Donovan J., Peters T., Eachus J., Pearson N., et al. Population requirement for primary knee replacement surgery: a cross-sectional study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2003, 42:516-521.
6. Drake B.G., Callahan C.M., Dittus R.S., Wright J.G. Global rating systems used in assessing knee arthroplasty outcomes. J Arthroplasty 1994, 9:409-417.
7. Lingard E.A., Katz J.N., Wright R.J., Wright E.A., Sledge C.B., Group K.O. Validity and responsiveness of the Knee Society Clinical Rating System in comparison with the SF-36 and Womac. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2001, 83:1856-1864.
8. Davies A.P. Rating systems for total knee replacement. Knee 2002, 9:261-266.
9. Deber R.B. Physicians in health care management: 7. The patient-physician partnership: changing roles and the desire for information. CMAJ 1994, 151:171-176.
10. Degner L.F., Sloan J.A. Decision-making during serious illness: what role do patients really want to play?. J Clin Epidemiol 1992, 45:941-950.
11. Clark J.P., Hudak P.L., Hawker G.A., Coyte P.C., Mahomed N.N., Kreder H.J., et al. The moving target: a qualitative study of elderly patients' decision-making regarding total joint replacement surgery. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2004, 86:1366-1374.
12. O'Neill T., Jinks C., Ong B.N. Decision-making regarding total knee replacement surgery: a qualitative meta-synthesis. BMC Health Serv Res 2007, 7:52.
13. Mancuso C.A., Sculco T.P., Wickiewicz T.L., Jones E.C., Robbins L., Warren R.F., et al. Patients' expectations of knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2001, 83:1005-1012.
14. Noble P.C., Conditt M.A., Cook K.F., Mathis K.B. The John Insall Award: patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 452:35-43.
15. Nilsdotter A., Toksvig-Larsen S., Roos E.M. Knee arthroplasty: are patients' expectations fulfilled?. Acta Orthop 2009, 80:55-61.
16. Tubach F., Ravaud P., Baron G., Falissard B., Logeart I., Bellamy N., et al. Evaluation of clinically relevant states in patient reported outcomes in knee and hip osteoarthritis: the patient acceptable symptom state. Ann Rheum Dis 2005, 64:34.
17. Dougados M., Moore A., Yu S., Gitton X. Evaluation of the patient acceptable symptom state in a pooled analysis of two multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies evaluating lumiracoxib and celecoxib in patients with osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 2007, 9:R11.
18. Laskin R.S. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: the results justify its use. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005, 440:54-59.
19. Dalury D.F., Dennis D.A. Mini-incision total knee arthroplasty can increase risk of component mal alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005, 440:77-81.
20. Lombardi A.V., Viacava A.J., Berend K.R. Rapid recovery protocols and minimally invasive surgery help achieve high knee flexion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 452:117-122.
21. Bauwens K., Matthes G., Wich M., Gebhard F., Hanson B., Ekkernkamp A., et al. Navigated total knee replacement. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2007, 89:261-269.
22. Mason J.B., Fehring T.K., Estok R., Banel D., Fahrbach K. Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22-8:1097-1106.
23. Nizard R.S., Porcher R., Ravaud P., Vangaver E., Hannouche D., Bizot P., et al. Use of the Cusum technique for evaluation of a CT-based navigation system for total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 425:180-188.
24. MacDonald S.J., Charron K.D., Bourne R.B., Naudie D.D., McCalden R.W., Rorabeck C.H. The John Insall Award: gender-specific total knee replacement: prospectively collected clinical outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008, 466:2612-2616.
25. Robertsson O., Dunbar M., Pehrsson T., Knutson K., Lidgren L. Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27,372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 2000, 71:262-267.
26. Fehring T.K., Odum S.M., Hughes J., Springer B.D., Beaver W.B. Differences between the sexes in the anatomy of the anterior condyle of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2009, 91:2335-2341.
27. Kim Y.H., Sohn K.S., Kim J.S. Range of motion of standard and high-flexion posterior stabilized total knee prostheses. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87:1470-1475.
28. McCalden R., Macdonald S., Charron K., Bourne R., Naudie D. The role of polyethylene design on postoperative TKA flexion: an analysis of 1534 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010, 468:108-114.
29. Fischer, et al. A procedure-specific systematic review and consensus recommendations for postoperative analgesia following total knee arthroplasty. Anaesthesia 2008, 63(10):1105-1123.
30. Maheshwari A.V., Blum Y.C., Shekhar L., Ranawat A.S., Ranawat C.S. Multimodal pain management after total hip and knee arthroplasty at the Ranawat Orthopaedic Center. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009, 467:1418-1423.
31. Sullivan M., Tanzer M., Stanish W., Fallaha M., Keefe F.J., Simmonds M., et al. Psychological determinants of problematic outcomes following total knee arthroplasty. Pain 2009, 143:123-129.
32. Brander V., Gondek S., Martin E., Stulberg S.D. Pain and depression influence outcome 5years after knee replacement surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007, 464:21-26.
33. Harden R.N., Bruehl S., Stanos S., Brander V., Chung O.Y., Saltz S., et al. Prospective examination of pain-related and psychological predictors of CRPS-like phenomena following total knee arthroplasty: a preliminary study. Pain 2003, 106:393-400.
34. Barrois B., Ribinik P., Gougeon F., Rannou F., Revel M. What is the role of the physical medicine and rehabilitation unit after total knee arthroplasty? Clinical practice recommendations. Ann Readapt Med Phys 2007, 50:729-733.
35. Minns Lowe C.J., Barker K.L., Dewey M., Sackley C.M. Effectiveness of physiotherapy exercise after knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised-controlled trials. BMJ 2007, 335:812.