Static and dynamic accommodation measured using the WAM-5500 autorefractor

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 87, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 873-882

  Win Hall, Dorothy M ^a   Houser, Jamie ^a   Glasser, Adrian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

accommodation; clinical testing; optometer; pupil; refraction

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; AUTOREFRACTORS; CALIBRATION CURVES; CLINICAL TESTING; DYNAMIC MEASUREMENT; DYNAMIC MODES; INFRARED FILTERS; INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE; PRINTED TEXTS; PUPIL; PUPIL DIAMETER; RESPONSE AMPLITUDES; RESPONSE GRAPHS; STATIC AND DYNAMIC;

OPTOMETERS; REFRACTION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

CALIBRATION;

ACCOMMODATION; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CALIBRATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EVALUATION; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; PUPIL; STATISTICAL MODEL; VISION TEST;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CALIBRATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PUPIL; VISION TESTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78349305549     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181f6f98f     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Dick HB. Accommodative intraocular lenses: current status. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2005;16:8-26.
2. Menapace R, Findl O, Kriechbaum K, Leydolt-Koeppl C. Accommodating intraocular lenses: a critical review of present and future concepts. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2007;245:473-89.
3. Glasser A. Restoration of accommodation: surgical options for correction of presbyopia. Clin Exp Optom 2008;91:279-95.
4. Mathews S. Scleral expansion surgery does not restore accommodation in human presbyopia. Ophthalmology 1999;106:873-7.
5. Ostrin LA, Kasthurirangan S, Glasser A. Evaluation of a satisfied bilateral scleral expansion band patient. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30:1445-53.
6. Kasthurirangan S, Vilupuru AS, Glasser A. Amplitude dependent accommodative dynamics in humans. Vision Res 2003;43:2945-56.
7. Bharadwaj SR, Schor CM. Acceleration characteristics of human ocular accommodation. Vision Res 2005;45:17-28.
8. Hasebe S, Graf EW, Schor CM. Fatigue reduces tonic accommodation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2001;21:151-60.
9. Vilupuru AS, Kasthurirangan S, Glasser A. Dynamics of accommodative fatigue in rhesus monkeys and humans. Vision Res 2005;45: 181-91.
10. Bharadwaj SR, Schor CM. Dynamic control of ocular disaccommodation: first and second-order dynamics. Vision Res 2006;46:1019-37.
11. Kasthurirangan S, Glasser A. Age related changes in the characteristics of the near pupil response. Vision Res 2006;46:1393-403.
12. Kasthurirangan S, Glasser A. Age related changes in accommodative dynamics in humans. Vision Res 2006;46:1507-19.
13. Heron G, Schor C. The fluctuations of accommodation and ageing. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1995;15:445-9.
14. Mordi JA, Ciuffreda KJ. Dynamic aspects of accommodation: age and presbyopia. Vision Res 2004;44:591-601.
15. Heron G, Charman WN. Accommodation as a function of age and the linearity of the response dynamics. Vision Res 2004;44:3119-30.
16. Wolffsohn JS, Naroo SA, Motwani NK, Shah S, Hunt OA, Mantry S, Sira M, Cunliffe IA, Benson MT. Subjective and objective performance of the Lenstec KH-3500 ;accommodative; intraocular lens. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:693-6.
17. Wolffsohn JS, Hunt OA, Naroo S, Gilmartin B, Shah S, Cunliffe IA, Benson MT, Mantry S. Objective accommodative amplitude and dynamics with the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:1230-5.
18. Mallen EA, Wolffsohn JS, Gilmartin B, Tsujimura S. Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 autorefractor in adults. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2001;21:101-7.
19. Wolffsohn JS, Gilmartin B, Mallen EA, Tsujimura S. Continuous recording of accommodation and pupil size using the Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 autorefractor. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2001;21: 108-13.
20. Wolffsohn JS, O'Donnell C, Charman WN, Gilmartin B. Simultaneous continuous recording of accommodation and pupil size using the modified Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 autorefractor. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2004;24:142-7.
21. Davies LN, Mallen EA, Wolffsohn JS, Gilmartin B. Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon NVision-K 5001/Grand Seiko WR-5100K autorefractor. Optom Vis Sci 2003;80:320-4.
22. Gwiazda J, Weber C. Comparison of spherical equivalent refraction and astigmatism measured with three different models of autorefrac-tors. Optom Vis Sci 2004;81:56-61.
23. Win-Hall DM, Ostrin LA, Kasthurirangan S, Glasser A. Objective accommodation measurement with the Grand Seiko and Hartinger coincidence refractometer. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84:879-87.
24. MandelbaumJ.Anaccommodation phenomenon. Arch Ophthalmol 1960;63:923-6.
25. Win-Hall DM, Glasser A. Objective accommodation measurements in prepresbyopic eyes using an autorefractor and an aberrometer. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34:774-84.
26. Anderson HA, Hentz G, Glasser A, Stuebing KK, Manny RE. Minus-lens-stimulated accommodative amplitude decreases sigmoi-dally with age: a study of objectively measured accommodative amplitudes from age 3. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:2919-26.
27. Anderson HA, Glasser A, Stuebing KK, Manny RE. Minus lens stim-ulated accommodative lag as a function of age. Optom Vis Sci 2009; 86:685-94.
28. Gwiazda J, Thorn F, Bauer J, Held R. Myopic children show insufficient accommodative response to blur. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993;34:690-4.
29. Seidemann A, Schaeffel F. An evaluation of the lag of accommodation using photorefraction. Vision Res 2003;43:419-30.
30. Owens DA. The Mandelbaum effect: evidence foran accommodative bias toward intermediate viewing distances. J Opt Soc Am 1979;69: 646-52.
31. Kimura S, Hasebe S, Ohtsuki H. Systematic measurement errors involved in over-refraction using an autorefractor (Grand-Seiko WV-500): is measurement of accommodative lag through spectacle lenses valid? Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2007;27:281-6.
32. Win-Hall DM, Glasser A. Objective accommodation measurements in pseudophakic subjects using an autorefractor and an aberrometer. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009;35:282-90.
33. Kasthurirangan S, Glasser A. Characteristics of pupil responses during far-to-near and near-to-far accommodation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2005;25:328-39.
34. Schor CM, Alexander J, Cormack L, Stevenson S. Negative feedback control model of proximal convergence and accommodation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1992;12:307-18.
35. Schor CM, Bharadwaj SR. Pulse-step models of control strategies for dynamic ocular accommodation and disaccommodation. Vision Res 2006;46:242-58.