Objective accommodation measurements in pseudophakic subjects using an autorefractor and an aberrometer

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 282-290

  Win Hall, Dorothy M ^a   Glasser, Adrian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABERROMETER; ACCOMMODATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUTOREFRACTOR; CALIBRATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL APPARATUS, EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES; OPHTHALMOLOGY; PHAKIC INTRAOCULAR LENS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDOPHAKIA; REFRACTION ERROR; REFRACTION INDEX; RELIABILITY; SOFT CONTACT LENS; VISUAL ACUITY;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; ADULT; AGED; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LENS IMPLANTATION, INTRAOCULAR; LENS, CRYSTALLINE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSEUDOPHAKIA; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 58749087294     PISSN: 08863350     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.10.033     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Keeney A.H., Hagman R.E., and Fratello C.J. Dictionary of Ophthalmic Optics (1995), Butterworth-Heinemann, Newton, MA 1345
2. Millodot M. Dictionary of Optometry and Vision Science. 4th ed (1997), Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK
3. Findl O., and Leydolt C. Meta-analysis of accommodating intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 33 (2007) 522-527
4. McLeod S.D. Optical principles, biomechanics, and initial clinical performance of a dual-optic accommodating intraocular lens (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 104 (2006) 437-452. Available at: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=1809902&;blobt ype=pdf Accessed October 23, 2008
5. Ossma I.L., Galvis A., Vargas L.G., Trager M.J., Vagefi M.R., and McLeod S.D. Synchrony dual-optic accommodating intraocular lens. Part 2: pilot clinical evaluation. J Cataract Refract Surg 33 (2007) 47-52
6. Sanders D.R., and Sanders M.L. Visual performance results after Tetraflex accommodating intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmology 114 (2007) 1679-1684
7. Gupta N., Naroo S.A., and Wolffsohn J.S. Is randomisation necessary for measuring defocus curves in pre-presbyopes?. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 30 (2007) 119-124
8. Dogru M., Honda R., Omoto M., Toda I., Fujishima H., Arai H., Matsuyama M., Nishijima S., Hida Y., Yagi Y., and Tsubota K. Early visual results with the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 31 (2005) 895-902
9. Langenbucher A., Huber S., Nguyen N.X., Seitz B., Gusek-Schneider G.C., and Küchle M. Measurement of accommodation after implantation of an accommodating posterior chamber intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 29 (2003) 677-685
10. Wolffsohn J.S., Hunt O.A., Naroo S., Gilmartin B., Shah S., Cunliffe I.A., Benson M.T., and Mantry S. Objective accommodative amplitude and dynamics with the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47 (2006) 1230-1235. http://www.iovs.org/cgi/reprint/47/3/1230 Accessed October 23, 2008
11. Wolffsohn J.S., Naroo S.A., Motwani N.K., Shah S., Hunt O.A., Mantry S., Sira M., Cunliffe I.A., and Benson M.T. Subjective and objective performance of the Lenstec KH-3500 "accommodative" intraocular lens. Br J Ophthalmol 90 (2006) 693-696
12. Abbott M.L., Schmid K.L., and Strang N.C. Differences in the accommodation stimulus response curves of adult myopes and emmetropes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 18 (1998) 13-20
13. Hazel C.A., Cox M.J., and Strang N.C. Wavefront aberration and its relationship to the accommodative stimulus-response function in myopic subjects. Optom Vis Sci 80 (2003) 151-158
14. McClelland J.F., and Saunders K.J. The repeatability and validity of dynamic retinoscopy in assessing the accommodative response. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 23 (2003) 243-250
15. Ostrin L.A., and Glasser A. Accommodation measurements in a prepresbyopic and presbyopic population. J Cataract Refract Surg 30 (2004) 1435-1444
16. Plainis S., Ginis H.S., and Pallikaris A. The effect of ocular aberrations on steady-state errors of accommodative response. J Vis 5 (2005) 466-477. http://www.journalofvision.org/5/5/7/ Accessed October 23, 2008
17. Tsukamoto M., Nakajima T., Nishino J., Hara Y., Uozato H., and Saishin M. The binocular accommodative response in uncorrected ametropia. Optom Vis Sci 78 (2001) 763-768
18. Win-Hall D.M., Ostrin L.A., Kasthurirangan S., and Glasser A. Objective accommodation measurement with the Grand Seiko and Hartinger coincidence refractometer. Optom Vis Sci 84 (2007) 879-887
19. Wold J.E., Hu A., Chen S., and Glasser A. Subjective and objective measurement of human accommodative amplitude. J Cataract Refract Surg 29 (2003) 1878-1888
20. Win-Hall D.M., and Glasser A. Objective accommodation measurements in prepresbyopic eyes using an autorefractor and an aberrometer. J Cataract Refract Surg 34 (2008) 774-784
21. Adler P. RAF near point rule modification. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 24 (2004) 469-470
22. Bland J.M., and Altman D.G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1 (1986) 307-310
23. Macsai M.S., Padnick-Silver L., and Fontes B.M. Visual outcomes after accommodating intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 32 (2006) 628-633
24. Montés-Micó R. Role of the tear film in the optical quality of the human eye. J Cataract Refract Surg 33 (2007) 1631-1635
25. Wolffsohn J.S., Ukai K., and Gilmartin B. Dynamic measurement of accommodation and pupil size using the portable Grand Seiko FR-5000 autorefractor. Optom Vis Sci 83 (2006) 306-310
26. Applegate R.A., Marcos S., and Thibos L.N. Aberrometry: clinical and research applications. [editorial]. Optom Vis Sci 80 (2003) 85-86
27. Wang L., Wang N., and Koch D.D. Evaluation of refractive error measurements of the WaveScan WaveFront system and the Tracey Wavefront aberrometer. J Cataract Refract Surg 29 (2003) 970-979
28. Pesudovs K., Parker K.E., Cheng H., and Applegate R.A. The precision of wavefront refraction compared to subjective refraction and autorefraction. Optom Vis Sci 84 (2007) 387-392