Long-term follow-up of a randomized trial comparing laparoscopic and mini-incision open live donor nephrectomy

American Journal of Transplantation

Volumn 10, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 2481-2487

  Dols, L F C ^a   Ijzermans, J N M ^a   Wentink, N ^a   Tran, T C K ^a   Zuidema, W C ^a   Dooper, I M ^b   Weimar, W ^a   Kok, N F M ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Blood pressure; kidney function; kidney transplantation; laparoscopic donor nephrectomy; live kidney donors; open donor nephrectomy; quality of life

Indexed keywords

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE; FATIGUE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GLOMERULUS FILTRATION RATE; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LAPAROSCOPIC DONOR NEPHRECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LIVING DONOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL DISEASE; MERALGIA PARESTHETICA; MINI INCISION OPEN DONOR NEPHRECTOMY; NEPHRECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; SURGICAL APPROACH;

ADULT; AGED; FATIGUE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LAPAROSCOPY; LIVING DONORS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; QUALITY OF LIFE; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TISSUE AND ORGAN HARVESTING; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 78349238931     PISSN: 16006135     EISSN: 16006143     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03281.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Kok NF, Lind MY, Hansson BM, et al,. Comparison of laparoscopic and mini incision open donor nephrectomy: Single blind, randomised controlled clinical trial. BMJ 2006; 333: 221 -226.
2. Andersen MH, Mathisen L, Oyen O, et al,. Postoperative pain and convalescence in living kidney donors-laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy: A randomized study. Am J Transplant 2006; 6: 1438 -1443.
3. Boudville N, Prasad GV, Knoll G, et al,. Meta-analysis: Risk for hypertension in living kidney donors. Ann Intern Med 2006; 145: 185 -196.
4. Simforoosh N, Basiri A, Tabibi A, Shakhssalim N, Moghaddam SMMH,. Comparison of laparoscopic and open donor nephrectomy: A randomized controlled trial. BJU Int 2005; 95: 851 -855.
5. Wolf JS, Jr, Merion RM, Leichtman AB, et al,. Randomized controlled trial of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open surgical live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 2001; 72: 284 -290.
6. Kok NF, Alwayn IP, Lind MY, Tran KT, Weimar W, IJzermans JN,. Donor nephrectomy: Mini-incision muscle-splitting open approach versus laparoscopy. Transplantation 2006; 81: 881 -887.
7. Goldfarb DA, Matin SF, Braun WE, et al,. Renal outcome 25 years after donor nephrectomy. J Urol 2001; 166: 2043 -2047.
8. Ratner LE, Kavoussi LR, Sroka M, et al,. Laparoscopic assisted live donor nephrectomy: A comparison with the open approach. Transplantation 1997; 63: 229 -233.
9. Flowers JL, Jacobs S, Cho E, et al,. Comparison of open and laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Ann Surg 1997; 226: 483 -489; discussion 489-490.
10. Neipp M, Jackobs S, Becker T, et al,. Living donor nephrectomy: Flank incision versus anterior vertical mini-incision. Transplantation 2004; 78: 1356 -1361.
11. Lewis GR, Brook NR, Waller JR, Bains JC, Veitch PS, Nicholson ML,. A comparison of traditional open, minimal-incision donor nephrectomy and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Transpl Int 2004; 17: 589 -595.
12. Cockcroft DW, Gault MH,. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 1976; 16: 31 -41.
13. www.americanheart.org. Accessed April 1, 2010
14. Smets EM, Garssen B, Cull A, De Haes JC,. Application of the multidimensional fatigue inventory (MFI-20) in cancer patients receiving radiotherapy. Br J Cancer 1996; 73: 241 -245.
15. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B,. SF-36® Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston, MA: New England Medical Center, The Health Institute, 1993.
16. Dunker MS, Bemelman WA, Slors JF, Van Duijvendijk P, Gouma DJ,. Functional outcome, quality of life, body image, and cosmesis in patients after laparoscopic-assisted and conventional restorative proctocolectomy: A comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44: 1800 -1807.
17. Segev DL, Muzaale AD, Caffo BS, et al,. Perioperative mortality and long-term survival following live kidney donation. JAMA 2010; 303: 959 -966.
18. Giessing M, Reuter S, Deger S, et al,. Laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy in Germany: Impact on donor health-related quality of life and willingness to donate. Transplant Proc 2005; 37: 2011 -2015.
19. Giessing M, Reuter S, Schonberger B, et al,. Quality of life of living kidney donors in Germany: A survey with the Validated Short Form-36 and Giessen Subjective Complaints List-24 questionnaires. Transplantation 2004; 78: 864 -872.
20. Isotani S, Fujisawa M, Ichikawa Y, et al,. Quality of life of living kidney donors: The short-form 36-item health questionnaire survey. Urology 2002; 60: 588 -592; discussion 592.
21. Perry KT, Freedland SJ, Hu JC, et al,. Quality of life, pain and return to normal activities following laparoscopic donor nephrectomy versus open mini-incision donor nephrectomy. J Urol 2003; 169: 2018 -2021.
22. Buell JF, Lee L, Martin JE, et al,. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy vs. open live donor nephrectomy: A quality of life and functional study. Clin Transplant 2005; 19: 102 -109.
23. Reimer J, Rensing A, Haasen C, Philipp T, Pietruck F, Franke GH,. The impact of living-related kidney transplantation on the donor's life. Transplantation 2006; 81: 1268 -1273.
24. Schover LR, Streem SB, Boparai N, Duriak K, Novick AC,. The psychosocial impact of donating a kidney: Long-term follow-up from a urology based center. J Urol 1997; 157: 1596 -1601.
25. Ibrahim HN, Foley R, Tan L, et al,. Long-term consequences of kidney donation. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 459 -469.
26. Andersen MH, Mathisen L, Veenstra M, et al,. Quality of life after randomization to laparoscopic versus open living donor nephrectomy: Long-term follow-up. Transplantation 2007; 84: 64 -69.
27. Kok NF, Alwayn IP, Tran KT, Hop WC, Weimar W, Ijzermans JN,. Psychosocial and physical impairment after mini-incision open and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: A prospective study. Transplantation 2006; 82: 1291 -1297.
28. Westlie L, Fauchald P, Talseth T, Jakobsen A, Flatmark A,. Quality of life in Norwegian kidney donors. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1993; 8: 1146 -1150.
29. Fehrman-Ekholm I, Brink B, Ericsson C, Elinder CG, Duner F, Lundgren G,. Kidney donors don't regret: Follow-up of 370 donors in Stockholm since 1964. Transplantation 2000; 69: 2067 -2071.
30. Kasiske BL, Ramos EL, Gaston RS, et al,. The evaluation of renal transplant candidates: Clinical practice guidelines. Patient Care and Education Committee of the American Society of Transplant Physicians. J Am Soc Nephrol 1995; 6: 1 -34.
31. Fehrman-Ekholm I, Duner F, Brink B, Tyden G, Elinder CG,. No evidence of accelerated loss of kidney function in living kidney donors: Results from a cross-sectional follow-up. Transplantation 2001; 72: 444 -449.