Quality of life after randomization to laparoscopic versus open living donor nephrectomy: Long-term follow-up

Transplantation

Volumn 84, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 64-69

  Andersen, Marit Helen ^a   Mathisen, Lars ^a   Veenstra, Marijke ^a   Øyen, Ole ^a   Edwin, Bjørn ^a   Digernes, Randi ^a   Kvarstein, Gunnvald ^a   Tønnessen, Tor Inge ^a,b   Wahl, Astrid Klopstad ^c   Hanestad, Berit Rokne ^c   Fosse, Erik ^a,b  

^a OSLO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

Author keywords

Laparoscopy; Living donor nephrectomy; Long term follow up; Quality of life

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FINANCE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LIVING DONOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEPHRECTOMY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZATION; SCAR; SCORING SYSTEM; SOCIAL INTERACTION;

ADULT; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; LAPAROSCOPY; LIVING DONORS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; QUALITY OF LIFE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 34447623413     PISSN: 00411337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000268071.63977.42     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Lumsdaine JA, Forsythe JLR, Lear PA. Living donation (renal). In: Forsythe JLR, ed. Transplantation: A Companion to Specialist Surgical Practice. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2005.
2. Westlie L, Leivestad T, Lien B, Meyer K, Fauchald P. Report from the Norwegian national hospitals living donor registry: One-year data, January 1, 2002. Transplant Proc 2003; 35: 777.
3. Schostak M, Wloch H, Müller M, et al. Living donor nephrectomy in an open technique: A long-term analysis of donor outcome. Transplant Proc 2003; 35: 2096.
4. Ratner LE, Ciseck LJ, Moore RG, et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 1995; 60: 1047.
5. Merlin TL, Scott DF, Rao MM, et al. The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: A systematic review. Transplantation 2000; 70: 1659.
6. Øyen O, Andersen M, Mathisen L, et al. Laparoscopic versus open living-donor nephrectomy: Experiences from a prospective, randomized, single-center study focusing on donor safety. Transplantation 2005; 79: 1236.
7. Andersen MH, Mathisen L, Øyen O, et al. Postoperative pain and convalescence in living kidney donors - laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy: A randomized study. Am J Transplant 2006; 6: 1438.
8. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item Short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473.
9. Ferrans CE. Development of a quality of life index for patients with cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 1990; 17: 15.
10. Øyen O, Line PD, Pfeffer P, et al. Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: Introduction of simple hand-assisted technique (without handport). Transplant Proc 2003; 35: 779.
11. Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual & Interpretation Guide. Boston: Health Institute; 1993.
12. Loge JH, Kaasa S. Short form 36 (SF-36) health survey: Normative data from the general Norwegian population. Scand J Soc Med 1998; 26: 250.
13. Giessing M, Reuter S, Deger S, et al. Laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy in Germany: Impact on donor health-related quality of life and willingness to donate. Transplant Proc 2005; 37: 2011.
14. Wolf JS, Merion RM, Leichtman AB, et al. Randomized controlled trial of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open surgical live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 2001; 72: 284.
15. Burckhardt C, Anderson K. The Quality of Life Scale (QOLS): reliability, validity, and utilization. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003; 1: 60.
16. Wahl A, Burckhardt C, Wiklund I, Hanestad BR. The Norwegian version of the Quality of Life Scale (QOLS-N). Scand J Caring Sci 1998; 12: 215.
17. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988.
18. Sundquist P, Feuk U, Häggman M, Persson AEG, Stridsberg M, Wadström J. Hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy in comparision to open and laparoscopic procedures: A prospective study on donor morbidity and kidney function. Transplantation 2004; 78: 147.
19. Lennerling A, Blohmé I, Östraat Ö, Lönroth H, Olausson M, Nyberg G. Laparoscopic or open surgery for living donor nephrectomy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2001; 16: 383.
20. Perry KT, Freedland SJ, Hu JC, et al. Quality of life, pain and return to normal activities following laparoscopic donor nephrectomy versus open mini-incision donor nephrectomy. J Urol. 2003; 169: 2018.
21. Hiller J, Sroka M, Holochek MJ, Morrison A, Kavoussi LR, Ratner LE. Functional advantages of laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy compared with conventional open-donor nephrectomy. J Transpl Coord 1997; 7: 134.
22. Kehlet H, Jensen T, Woolf C. Persistent postsurgical pain: Risk factors and prevention. Lancet 2006; 367: 1618.
23. Reimer J, Rensing A, Haasen C, Philipp T, Pietruck F, Franke GH. The impact of living-related kidney transplantation on the donor's life. Transplantation 2006; 81: 1268.
24. Kok NFM, Alwayn IPJ, Tran KTC, Hop WJC, Weimar W, IJzermans JNM. Psychosocial and Physical impairment after mini-incision open and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: A prospective study. Transplantation 2006; 82: 1291.
25. Buell JF, Lee L, Martin JE, et al. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy vs. open live donor nephrectomy: A quality of life and functional study. Clin Transplant 2004; 19: 102.
26. Slakely DP, Wood JC, Hender D, Thomas R, Cheng S. Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: Advantages of the hand-assisted method. Transplantation 1999; 68: 581.
27. Wolf JS, Moon TD, Nakada SY. Hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy: comparision to standard laparoscopic nephrectomy. J Urol 1998; 160: 22.
28. Kok NFM, Lind MY, Hansson BME, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and mini-incision open donor nephrectomy: Single blind, randomised controlled clinical trial. BMJ 2006; 333: 221.