Psychosocial and physical impairment after mini-incision open and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: A prospective study

Transplantation

Volumn 82, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 1291-1297

  Kok, Niels F M ^a   Alwayn, Ian P J ^a   Tran, Khe T C ^a   Hop, Wim C J ^a   Weimar, Willem ^a   Ijzermans, Jan N M ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Kidney transplantation; Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy; Living donors; Minimally invasive; Quality of life

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FATIGUE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC DONOR NEPHRECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINI INCISION DONOR NEPHRECTOMY; MULTIDIMENSIONAL FATIGUE INVENTORY 20; NEPHRECTOMY; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOSOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; QUALITY OF LIFE; SCORING SYSTEM; SHORT FORM 36; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; WORK RESUMPTION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FATIGUE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LIVING DONORS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PSYCHOACOUSTICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; SOCIAL ADJUSTMENT; TISSUE AND ORGAN HARVESTING;

EID: 33751507703     PISSN: 00411337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000239312.45050.05     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bergman S, Feldman LS, Mayo NE, et al. Measuring surgical recovery: the study of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Am J Transplant 2005; 5(10): 2489.
2. Smith GC, Trauer T, Kerr PG, Chadban SJ. Prospective psychosocial monitoring of living kidney donors using the Short Form-36 health survey: results at 12 months. Transplantation 2004; 78(9): 1384.
3. Ware JE KM, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey. Manual and Interpretation Guide: Lincoln, 1993, 2000.
4. Smets EM, Garssen B, Cull A, de Haes JC. Application of the multidimensional fatigue inventory (MFI-20) in cancer patients receiving radiotherapy. Br J Cancer 1996; 73(2): 241.
5. Ratner LE, Kavoussi LR, Sroka M, et al. Laparoscopic assisted live donor nephrectomy-a comparison with the open approach. Transplantation 1997; 63(2): 229.
6. Flowers JL, Jacobs S, Cho E, et al. Comparison of open and laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Ann Surg 1997; 226(4): 483.
7. Wolf JS Jr., Merion RM, Leichtman AB, et al. Randomized controlled trial of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open surgical live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 2001; 72(2): 284.
8. Kok NF, Alwayn IP, Lind MY, et al. Donor nephrectomy: mini-incision muscle-splitting open approach versus laparoscopy. Transplantation 2006; 81(6): 881.
9. Neipp M, Jackobs S, Becker T, et al. Living donor nephrectomy: flank incision versus anterior vertical mini-incision. Transplantation 2004; 78(9): 1356.
10. Lewis GR, Brook NR, Waller JR, et al. A comparison of traditional open, minimal-incision donor nephrectomy and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Transpl Int 2004; 17(10): 589.
11. Lind MY, Hop WC, Weimar W, IJzermans JN. Body image after laparoscopic or open donor nephrectomy. Surg Endosc 2004; 18(8): 1276.
12. Lind MY, Liem YS, Bemelman WA, et al. Live donor nephrectomy and return to work: does the operative technique matter? Surg Endosc 2003; 17(4): 591.
13. Brooks R. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 1996; 37(1): 53.
14. Aaronson NK, Muller M, Cohen PD, et al. Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51(11): 1055.
15. Giessing M, Reuter S, Schonberger B, et al. Quality of life of living kidney donors in Germany: a survey with the Validated Short Form-36 and Giessen Subjective Complaints List-24 questionnaires. Transplantation 2004; 78(6): 864.
16. Buell JF, Lee L, Martin JE, et al. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy vs. open live donor nephrectomy: a quality of life and functional study. Clin Transplant 2005; 19(1): 102.
17. Isotani S, Fujisawa M, Ichikawa Y, et al. Quality of life of living kidney donors: the short-form 36-item health questionnaire survey. Urology 2002; 60(4): 588.
18. Perry KT, Freedland SJ, Hu JC, et al. Quality of life, pain and return to normal activities following laparoscopic donor nephrectomy versus open mini-incision donor nephrectomy. J Urol 2003; 169(6): 2018.
19. Giessing M, Reuter S, Deger S, et al. Laparoscopic versus Open Donor Nephrectomy in Germany: Impact on Donor Health-Related Quality of Life and Willingness to Donate. Transplant Proc 2005; 37(5): 2011.
20. Reimer J, Rensing A, Haasen C, et al. The Impact of Living-Related Kidney Transplantation on the Donor's Life. Transplantation 2006; 81(9): 1268.
21. Pace KT, Dyer SJ, Phan V, et al. Laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy. Surg Endosc 2003; 17(1): 134.
22. Ku JH. Health-related quality of life of living kidney donors: review of the short form 36-health questionnaire survey. Transpl Int 2005; 18(12): 1309.