Participation in science practices while working in a multimedia case-based environment

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 47, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1116-1136

  Kang, Hosun ^a   Lundeberg, Mary A ^b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b 447 Erickson Hall ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

case based; gender; identity; multimedia; participation

Indexed keywords

CASE-BASED; GENDER; IDENTITY; MULTIMEDIA; PARTICIPATION;

INTERNET; STUDENTS;

TEACHING;

EID: 78249253321     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: 10982736     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tea.20371     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. AAUW. (2004). Under the microscope: A decade of gender equity projects in the sciences. Washington, DC: The American Association of University Women Educational Foundation.
2. Baker, D., (2002). Editorial: Where is gender and equity in science education? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 659-664.
3. Barton, A.C., Tan, E., &, Rivet, A., (2008). Creating hybrid spaces for engaging school science among urban middle school girls. American Educational Research Journal, 45 (1), 68-103.
4. Belenky, M.F., Clichy, B.M., Goldberger, N.R., &, Tarule, J.M., (1986). Women's ways of knowing. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
5. Bergland, M., Lundeberg, M.A., Klyczek, K., Sweet, J., Emmons, J., Martin, C., Marsh, K., Werner, J., &, Jarvis- Uetz, M., (2006). Exploring biotechnology using case-based multimedia. The American Biology Teacher, 68 (2), 81-86.
6. Brickhouse, N.W., (2001). Embodying science: A feminist perspective on learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38 (3), 282-295.
7. Brickhouse, N.W., Lowery, P., &, Schultz, K., (2000). What kind of a girl does science? The construction of school science identities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37 (5), 441-458.
8. Brickhouse, N.W., &, Potter, J., (2001). Young women's scientific identity formation in an urban context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38 (8), 965-980.
9. Brotman, J.S., &, Moore, F.M., (2008). Girls and science: A review of four themes in the science education literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45 (9), 971-1002.
10. Brown, B.A., (2006). "It isn't no slang that can be said about this stuff": Language, identity, and appropriating science discourse. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43 (1), 96-126.
11. Brown, J.S., Collins, A., &, Duguid, P., (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18 (1), 32-42.
12. Carlone, H.B., &, Johnson, A., (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44 (9), 1187-1218.
13. Carlone, H.B., &, Webb, S., (2006). On (not) overcoming our history or hierarchy: Complexity of university/school collaboration. Science Education, 90, 544-568.
14. Conlin, M., (2003, May 26). The new second sex. Business Week.
15. Fensham, P.J., (2009). Real world contexts in PISA science: Implications for context-based science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46 (8), 884-896.
16. Glaser, B., &, Strauss, A., (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Transaction.
17. Hakkarainen, K., Järvelä, S., Lipponen, L., &, Lehtinen, E., (1998). Culture of a collaboration in computer-supported learning: a finish perspective. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 9 (3-4), 271-288.
18. Hakkarainen, K., &, Palonen, T., (2003). Patterns of female and male students' participation in peer interaction in computer-supported learning. Computers & Education, 40 (4), 327-342.
19. Holland, D., William, L.J., Skinner, D., &, Carole, C., (2001). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Hsi, S., &, Hoadley, C., (1997). Productive discussion in science: Gender equity through electronic discourse. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 6 (1), 23-36.
21. Ivie, R., Czujko, R., &, Stowe, K., (2002) Women physicists speak: The 2001 international physics study of women in physics. In, B.K. Artline, &, D. Li, (Eds.). Women in physics: The IUPAP international conference on women in physics. Melvill, New York: American Institute of Physics.
22. Krippendorff, K., (2003). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
23. Lave, J., &, Wenger, E., (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. Lemke, J., (1998). Multimedia literacy demands of the scientific curriculum. Linguistics and Education, 10 (3), 247-271.
25. Lundeberg, M.A., &, Mohan, L., (2007). Gender issues and schooling. In:, T.L. Good, (Ed.), 21st Century Education: A reference handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. National Academies. (2007). Beyond bias and barriers: Fulfilling the potential of women in academic science and engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
27. National Center for Education Statistics. (2004). Highlights from the trends in international math and science study (TIMSS) 2003. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
28. OECD. (2007). PISA 2006: Science competencies for tomorrow's world executive summary: OECD 2007.
29. Rivet, A.E., &, Krajcik, J.S., (2008). Contextualizing instruction: Leveraging students' prior knowledge and experiences to foster understanding of middle school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45 (1), 79-100.
30. Schmidt, B., &, Stewart, S., (2009). Implementing the virtual reality learning environment: Second Life. Nurse Educator, 34 (4), 152-155.
31. Scholer, A.M., (1998). Issues of gender and personal life for women in academic biology. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 4, 69-89.
32. Seymour, E., &, Hewitt, N., (1997). Talking about learning. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
33. Songer, N.B., (2007). Digital resources vs. cognitive tools: A discussion of learning science with technology. In:, K.S. Abell, &, G.N. Lederman, (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 471-492). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34. Strauss, A., &, Corbin, J.M., (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
35. Sugar, W.A., &, Bonk, C.J., (1998). Student role play in the world forum: Analyses of an arctic adventure learning apprenticeship. In:, C.J. Bonk, &, K.S. King, (Eds.), Electronic Collaborators. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
36. Thompson, J.J., &, Windschitl, M., (2005). "Failing girls": Understanding connections among identity negotiation, personal relevance, and engagement in science learning from underachieving girls. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 11, 1-26.
37. Tobin, K., (2007) Producing and maintaining emotional climates to support success in science. International academic conference of preparing quality science teachers for elementary and secondary schools (pp. A4-1-20). Taiwan.
38. Volman, M., &, van Eck, E., (2001). Gender equity and information technology in education: The second decade. Review of Educational Research, 71 (4), 613-634.
39. Waters, J.K., (2009). A 'Second Life- for educators. THE Journal, 36 (1), 29-34.