Priming by NUMB3R5 Does Not Involve Top-Down Feedback

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1422-1440

  Kinoshita, Sachiko ^a   Lagoutaris, Stephanie ^a  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Bayesian reader; Leet priming; Letter perception; Masked priming; Top down feedback

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MATHEMATICS; METHODOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; STUDENT; UNIVERSITY;

DECISION MAKING; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; HUMANS; MATHEMATICS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; STUDENTS; UNIVERSITIES; VOCABULARY;

EID: 78249248354     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0020609     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Baker C.I., Liu J., Wald L.L., Kwong K.K., Benner T., Kanwisher N. Visual word processing and experiential origins of functional selectivity in human extrastriate cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 2007, 104:9087-9092. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703300104.
2. Caramazza A., Miceli G. The structure of graphemic representations. Cognition 1990, 37:243-297. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(90)90047-N.
3. Carreiras M., Duñabeitia J.A., Perea M. READING WORDS, NUMB3R5 and $YMßOL$. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2007, 11:454-455.
4. Dehaene S., Cohen L. Response to Carreiras et al.: The role of visual similarity, feedforward, feedback and lateral pathways in reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2007, 11:456-457.
5. Dehaene S., Jobert A., Naccache L., Ciuciu P., Poline J.-B., Le Bihan D., Cohen L. Letter binding and invariant recognition of masked words. Psychological Science 2004, 15:307-313. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00674.x.
6. Forster K.I., Forster J.C. DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 2003, 35:116-124.
7. Gathercole S.E., Frankish C.R., Pickering S.J., Peaker S. Phonotactic influences on short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1999, 25:84-95. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.25.1.84.
8. Grainger J., Granier J.-P., Farioli F., Van Assche E., van Heuven W.J.B. Letter position information and printed word perception: The relative-position priming constraint. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32:865-884. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.865.
9. James K.H., James T.W., Jobard G., Wong A.C.-N., Gauthier I. Letter processing in the visual system: Different activation patterns for single letters and strings. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 2005, 5:452-466. doi: 10.3758/CABN.5.4.452.
10. Kinoshita S., Kaplan L. Priming of abstract letter identities in the letter match task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2008, 61:1873-1885. doi: 10.1080/17470210701781114.
11. Kinoshita S., Norris D. Transposed-letter priming of prelexical orthographic representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2009, 35:1-18. doi: 10.1037/a0014277.
12. Kučera H., Francis W.N. Computational analysis of present-day American English 1967, Brown University Press, Providence, RI.
13. McClelland J.L., Rumelhart D.E. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review 1981, 88:375-407. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375.
14. Norris D. The Bayesian reader: Explaining word recognition as an optimal Bayesian decision process. Psychological Review 2006, 113:327-357. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.327.
15. Norris D., Kinoshita S. Perception as evidence accumulation and Bayesian inference: Insights from masked priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2008, 137:434-455. doi: 10.1037/a0012799.
16. Norris D., McQueen J.M., Cutler A. Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2000, 23:299-325. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00003241.
17. Perea M., Duñabeitia J.A., Carreiras M. R34D1NG W0RD5 W1TH NUMB3R5. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34:237-241. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.1.237.
18. Perea M., Duñabeitia J.A., Pollatsek A., Carreiras M. Does the brain regularize digits and letters to the same extent?. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2009, 62:1881-1888. doi: 10.1080/17470210902923374.
19. Polk T.A., Stallcup M., Aguirre G.K., Alsop D.C., D'Esposito M., Detre M., Farah M.J. Neural specialization for letter recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2002, 14:145-159. doi: 10.1162/089892902317236803.
20. Reicher G.M. Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1969, 81:275-280. doi: 10.1037/h0027768.
21. Schweickert R. A multinomial processing tree model for degradation and redintegration in immediate recall. Memory & Cognition 1993, 21:168-175.
22. Vogel E.K., Woodman G.F., Luck S.J. Storage of features, conjunctions, and objects in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2001, 27:92-114. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.27.1.92.
23. Yarkoni T., Balota D.A., Yap M. Moving beyond Coltheart's N: A new measure of orthographic similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2008, 15:971-979. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.5.971.