READING WORDS, NUMB3R5 and $YMßOL

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 11, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 454-455

  Carreiras, Manuel ^a,b   Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni ^a   Perea, Manuel ^c  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE LA LAGUNA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; LANGUAGE ABILITY; LEARNING; LETTER; PERCEPTION; READING; SPEECH ARTICULATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION; WORD LIST RECALL; WORD RECOGNITION;

BRAIN; CUES; FEEDBACK; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; READING; VISUAL PATHWAYS;

EID: 36048930123     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.08.007     Document Type: Letter

References (8)

1. Pelli D.G., et al. The remarkable inefficiency of word recognition. Nature 423 (2003) 752-756
2. Dehaene S., et al. The neural code for written words: a proposal. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9 (2005) 335-341
3. Kronbichler M., et al. The visual word form area and the frequency with which words are encountered: Evidence from a parametric fMRI study. Neuroimage 21 (2004) 946-953
4. Price C.J., and Devlin J.T. The myth of the visual word form area. Neuroimage 19 (2003) 473-481
5. Polk T.A., et al. Neural specialization for letter recognition. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 14 (2002) 145-159
6. Reinke K., et al. Functional specificity of the visual word form area: General activation for words and symbols but specific network activation for words. Brain Lang (2007) 10.1016/j.bandl.2007.04.006
7. Perea, M. et al., R34D1NG W0RD5 W1TH NUMB3R5. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. (in press)
8. Jordan T.R., et al. The illusory letters phenomenon: An illustration of graphemic restoration in visual word recognition. Perception 28 (1999) 1413-1416