Group-based judgmental forecasting: An integration of extant knowledge and the development of priorities for a new research agenda

International Journal of Forecasting

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1-13

  Wright, George ^a   Rowe, Gene ^b  

^a DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b NORWICH RESEARCH PARK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78149500065     PISSN: 01692070     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2010.05.012     Document Type: Editorial

References (40)

1. Arnold V., Clark N., Collier P.A., Leech S.A., Sutton S.G. The differential use and effect of knowledge-based system explanations in novice and expert judgment decisions. MIS Quarterly 2006, 30:79-97.
2. Benda W.G.G., Engels T.C.E. The predictive validity of peer review: a selective review of the judgmental forecasting qualities of peers, and implications for innovation in science. International Journal of Forecasting 2011, 27:166-182.
3. Berg J., Nelson F., Rietz T.A. Prediction market accuracy in the long run. International Journal of Forecasting 2008, 24:285-300.
4. Brockriede W., Ehninger D. Toulmin on argument: an interpretation and application. Quarterly Journal of Speech 1960, 46:44-53.
5. Cairns, G., Sliwa, M., & Wright, G. (in press). Problematizing international business futures through a 'critical scenario method'. Futures, in press.
6. Cairns G., Wright G., Bradfield R., van der Heijden K., Burt G. Enhancing foresight between multiple agencies: issues in the use of scenario thinking to overcome fragmentation. Futures 2006, 38:1011-1025.
7. Corey G.A., Merenstein J.H. Applying the ischemic heart disease predictive instrument. The Journal of Family Practice 1987, 25:127-133.
8. De Marchi B., Ravetz J.R. Risk management and governance: a post-normal science approach. Futures 1999, 31:743-757.
9. Graefe A., Armstrong J.S. Comparing face-to-face meetings, nominal groups, Delphi and prediction markets on an estimation task. International Journal of Forecasting 2011, 27:183-195.
10. Green K.C. Forecasting decisions in conflict situations: a comparison of game theory, role-playing, and unaided judgment. International Journal of Forecasting 2002, 18:321-433.
11. Green K.C. Game theory, simulated interaction, and unaided judgement for forecasting decisions in conflicts: further evidence. International Journal of Forecasting 2005, 21:463-472.
12. Green K.C., Armstrong J.S. Role thinking: standing in other people's shoes to forecast decisions in conflicts. International Journal of Forecasting 2011, 27:69-80.
13. Goodwin P., Wright G. The limits of forecasting in anticipating rare events. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2010, 77:355-368.
14. Jodlbauer B., Jonas E. Forecasting clients' reactions: how does perception of strategic behaviour influence acceptance of advice?. International Journal of Forecasting 2011, 27:121-133.
15. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist 1984, 39:341-350.
16. Kerr N.L., Tindale R.S. Group-based forecasting?: a social psychological analysis. International Journal of Forecasting 2011, 27:14-40.
17. Klenk N.L., Hickey G.M. A virtual and anonymous, deliberative and analytic participation process for planning and evaluation: the concept mapping policy Delphi. International Journal of Forecasting 2011, 27:152-165.
18. Laird F.N. The decline of deference: the political context of risk communication. Risk Analysis 1989, 9:545-550.
19. Landeta J., Barrutia J. People consultation to construct the future: a Delphi application. International Journal of Forecasting 2011, 27:134-151.
20. Nemeth C., Brown K., Rogers J. Devil's advocate versus authentic dissent: stimulating quantity and quality. European Journal of Social Psychology 2001, 31:707-720.
21. Nemeth C., Chiles C. Modeling courage: the role of dissent in fostering independence. European Journal of Social Psychology 1998, 18:275-280.
22. Onkal D., Lawrence M., Sayim K.Z. Influence of differentiated roles on group forecasting accuracy. International Journal of Forecasting 2011, 27:50-68.
23. Rowe G., Frewer L.J. Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation. Science, Technology, and Human Values 2000, 25:3-29.
24. Rowe G., Frewer L.J. A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science, Technology, and Human Values 2005, 30:251-290.
25. Rowe G., Wright G. The impact of task characteristics on the performance of structured group forecasting techniques. International Journal of Forecasting 1996, 12:73-89.
26. Rowe G., Wright G. Differences in expert and lay judgments of risk: myth or reality?. Risk Analysis 2001, 21(2):341-356.
27. Rowe G., Wright G., Bolger F. The Delphi technique: a re-evaluation of research and theory. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 1991, 39:235-251.
28. Schweiger D.M., Sandberg W.R., Ragan J.W. Group approaches for improving strategic decision making: a comparative analysis of dialectical inquiry, devil's advocacy, and consensus. Academy of Management Journal 1986, 29:51-71.
29. Schweiger D.M., Sandberg W.R., Rechner P.A. Experiential effects of dialectical inquiry, devil's advocacy, and consensus approaches to strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal 1989, 32:745-772.
30. Seick W.R., Arkes H.R. The recalcitrance of overconfidence and its contribution to decision aid neglect. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2005, 18:29-53.
31. Sniezek J.A. Groups under uncertainty: an examination of confidence in group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1992, 52:124-155.
32. Soll J.B., Mannes A.E. Judgmental aggregation strategies depend on whether the self is involved. International Journal of Forecasting 2011, 27:81-102.
33. Van de Ven A.H., Delbecq A.L. The effectiveness of Nominal, Delphi, and Interacting group decision making processes. Academy of Management Review 1974, 17:605-621.
34. van der Heijden K., Bradfield R., Burt G., Cairns G., Wright G. The sixth sense: accelerating organisational learning with scenarios 2002, Wiley, Chichester.
35. Van Swol L. Forecasting another's enjoyment versus giving the right answer: trust, shared values, task effects, and confidence in improving the acceptance of advice. International Journal of Forecasting 2011, 27:103-120.
36. Van Swol L.M., Sniezek J.A. Trust, confidence, and expertise in a judge-advisor system. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2001, 84:288-307.
37. Webler T. 'Right' discourse in citizen participation: an evaluative yardstick. Fairness and competence in citizen participation: evaluating models for environmental discourse 1995, 35-86. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands. O. Renn, T. Webler, P. Wiedemann (Eds.).
38. Wright G. Game theory, game theorists, university students, role-playing and forecasting ability. International Journal of Forecasting 2002, 18:383-387.
39. Wright G., Goodwin P. Decision making and planning under low levels of predictability: enhancing the scenario method. International Journal of Forecasting 2009, 25:813-825.
40. Yaniv I. Group diversity and decision quality: amplification and attenuation of the framing effect. International Journal of Forecasting 2011, 27:41-49.