Differential patterns of spontaneous experiential response to a hypnotic induction: A latent profile analysis

Consciousness and Cognition

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 1140-1150

  Terhune, Devin Blair ^a   Cardeña, Etzel ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Dissociation; Fantasy proneness; Hypnosis; Hypnotic suggestibility; Involuntariness; Latent profile analysis; Phenomenology; Typology

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AFFECT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; BOOTSTRAPPING; CONSCIOUSNESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISSOCIATION; EXPERIENCE; FANTASY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPNOSIS; HYPNOTIC SUGGESTIBILITY; IMAGERY; INVOLUNTARY COMMITMENT; LATENT PROFILE ANALYSIS; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PHENOMENOLOGY; RESPONSE TIME; SELF REPORT; SPONTANEOUS EXPERIENTIAL RESPONSE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ATTENTION; AWARENESS; DISSOCIATIVE DISORDERS; FANTASY; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPNOSIS; INDIVIDUALITY; INTERNAL-EXTERNAL CONTROL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PERCEPTION; PERSONALITY INVENTORY; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SUGGESTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78149495321     PISSN: 10538100     EISSN: 10902376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2010.03.006     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Akaike H. Factor analysis and the AIC. Psychometrika 1987, 52:317-332.
2. Barber T.X. A comprehensive three-dimensional theory of hypnosis. Clinical hypnosis and self-regulation: Cognitive-behavioral perspectives 1999, 21-48. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. I. Kirsch, A. Capafons, E. Cardeña-Buelna, S. Amigo (Eds.).
3. Barber T.X. Hypnosis: A mature view. Contemporary Hypnosis 1999, 16:123-127.
4. Barrett D. Fantasizers and dissociaters: Two types of high hypnotizables, two different imagery styles. Hypnosis and imagination 1996, 123-135. Baywood, Amityville, NY. R.G. Kunsendorf, N.P. Spanos, B. Wallace (Eds.).
5. Bowers K.S. The Waterloo-Stanford Group C (WSGC) scale of hypnotic susceptibility: Normative and comparative data. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 1993, 41:35-46.
6. Bowers K.S. Waterloo-stanford group scale of hypnotic susceptibility, form C: Manual and response booklet. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 1998, 46:250-268.
7. Brown R.J., Oakley D.A. An integrative cognitive theory of hypnosis and high hypnotizability. The highly hypnotizable person: Theoretical, experimental and clinical issues 2004, 152-186. Routledge, NY. M. Heap, R.J. Brown, D.A. Oakley (Eds.).
8. Cardeña, E. (1996). Just floating in the sky. A comparison of shamanic and hypnotic phenomenology. In R. Quekelbherge & D. Eigner (Eds.), 6th Jahrbuch fur transkulturelle medizin und psychotherapie [6th Yearbook of cross-cultural medicine and psychotherapy] (pp. 367-380). Berlin: Verlag fur Wissenschaft und Bildung.
9. Cardeña E. The phenomenology of hypnosis: Physically active and quiescent. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 2005, 53:1-23.
10. Cardeña, E., Jönsson, P., Terhune, D. B., & Lehmann, D. (2009). Spontaneous hypnotic phenomenology across the hypnotizability spectrum. Manuscript in preparation.
11. Cardeña E., Kallio S., Terhune D.B., Buratti S., Lööf A. The effect of translation and sex on hypnotizability testing. Contemporary Hypnosis 2007, 27:154-160.
12. Cardeña E., Terhune D.B. A note of caution on the Waterloo Stanford Group scale of hypnotic susceptibility. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 2009, 45:222-226.
13. Carlson E.B., Putnam F.W. Integrating research on dissociation and hypnotizability: Are there two pathways to hypnotizability?. Dissociation 1989, 2:32-38.
14. Danziger N., Fournier E., Bouhassira D., Michaud D., De Broucker T., Santarcangelo E., et al. Different strategies of modulation can be operative during hypnotic analgesia: A neurophysiological study. Pain 1998, 75:85-92.
15. Dienes Z., Brown E., Hutton S., Kirsch I., Mazzoni G., Wright D.B. Hypnotic suggestibility, cognitive inhibition, and dissociation. Consciousness and Cognition 2009, 18:837-847.
16. Egner T., Jamieson G., Gruzelier J. Hypnosis decouples cognitive control from conflict monitoring processes of the frontal lobe. Neuroimage 2005, 27:969-978.
17. Field P.B. An inventory of hypnotic depth. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 1965, 13:238-249.
18. Forbes E.J., Pekala R.J. Types of hypnotically (un)susceptible individuals as a function of phenomenological experience: A partial replication. Australian Journal of Clinical & Experimental Hypnosis 1996, 24:92-109.
19. Goodman L.A. Latent class analysis: The empirical study of latent types, latent variables, and latent structures, and some notes on the history of this subject. Applied latent class analysis 2002, 3-55. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. J.A. Hagenaars, A.L. McCutcheon (Eds.).
20. Henry, D. (1985). Subjects' expectancies and subjective experience of hypnosis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.
21. Kihlstrom J.F. The domain of hypnosis, revisited. Oxford handbook of hypnosis 2008, 21-52. Oxford University Press, Oxford. M.R. Nash, A.J. Barnier (Eds.).
22. Kirsch I. Changing expectations: A key to effective psychotherapy 1990, Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, CA.
23. Kirsch I. How expectancies shape experience 1999, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
24. Kirsch I., Lynn S.J. Dissociation theories of hypnosis. Psychological Bulletin 1998, 123:100-115.
25. Kumar V.K., Pekala R.J. Hypnotizability, absorption, and individual differences in phenomenological experience. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 1988, 36:80-88.
26. Kumar V.K., Pekala R.J. Variations in phenomenological experience as a function of hypnotic susceptibility: A replication. British Journal of Experimental and Clinical Hypnosis 1989, 6:17-22.
27. Kumar V.K., Pekala R.J., Cummings J. Trait factors, state effects, and hypnotizability. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 1996, 44:232-249.
28. Kumar V.K., Pekala R.J., Marcano G. Hypnotizability, dissociativity, and phenomenological experience. Dissociation 1996, 9:143-153.
29. Kunzendorf R.G., Boisvert P. Presence vs. absence of a 'hidden observer' during total deafness: The hypnotic illusion of subconsciousness vs. the imaginal attenuation of brainstem evoked potentials. Hypnosis and imagination 1996, 223-234. Baywood, Amityville, NY. R.G. Kunzendorf, N.P. Spanos, B. Wallace (Eds.).
30. Laurence J.-R., Beaulieu-Prévost D., du Chéné T. Measuring and understanding individual differences in hypnotizability. Oxford handbook of hypnosis 2008, 225-253. Oxford University Press, Oxford. M.R. Nash, A. Barnier (Eds.).
31. Lo Y., Mendell N., Rubin D.B. Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika 2001, 88:767-778.
32. Lynn S.J., Kirsch I., Hallquist M.N. Social cognitive theories of hypnosis. Oxford handbook of hypnosis 2008, 111-139. Oxford University Press, Oxford. M.R. Nash, A. Barnier (Eds.).
33. Lynn S.J., Lilienfeld S., Rhue J.W. An evaluation of Barber's three-dimensional theory of hypnosis: Promise and pitfalls. Contemporary Hypnosis 1999, 16:160-164.
34. Lynn S.J., Meyer E., Schindler K. Clinical correlates of high hypnotizability. The highly hypnotizable person: Theoretical, experimental and clinical issues 2004, 187-212. Routledge, NY. M. Heap, R.J. Brown, D.A. Oakley (Eds.).
35. Magidson J., Vermunt J.K. Latent class models for clustering: A comparison with K-means. Canadian Journal of Marketing Research 2002, 20:37-44.
36. McConkey K.M., Barnier A.J. High hypnotizability: Unity and diversity in behavior and experience. The highly hypnotizable person: Theoretical, experimental and clinical issues 2004, 61-84. Routledge, NY. M. Heap, R.J. Brown, D.A. Oakley (Eds.).
37. McCutcheon A.C. Latent class analysis 1987, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
38. McCutcheon A.L. Basic concepts and procedures in single and multiple group latent class analysis. Applied latent class analysis 2002, 56-85. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. J.A. Hagenaars, A.L. McCutcheon (Eds.).
39. McLachlan G., Peel D. Finite mixture models 2000, Wiley, NY.
40. Muthén L.K., Muthén B.O. Mplus user's guide 1998, Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CA. 5th ed.
41. Nylund K.L., Asparouhov T., Muthén B.O. Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling 2007, 14:535-569.
42. Oakley D.A., Halligan P.W. Hypnotic suggestion and cognitive neuroscience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2009, 13:264-270.
43. Pekala R.J. The phenomenology of consciousness inventory 1991, Mid-Atlantic Educational Institute, Inc, West Chester, PA.
44. Pekala R.J. Hypnotic types: Evidence from a cluster analysis of phenomenal experience. Contemporary Hypnosis 1991, 8:95-104.
45. Pekala R.J., Forbes E.J. Types of hypnotically (un)susceptible individuals as a function of phenomenological experience. Towards a typology of hypnotic types. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis 1997, 39:212-224.
46. Pekala R.J., Kumar V.K. An empirical-phenomenological approach to quantifying consciousness and states of consciousness: With particular reference to understanding the nature of hypnosis. Hypnosis and conscious states: The cognitive neuroscience perspective 2007, 167-194. Oxford University Press, NY. G.A. Jamieson (Ed.).
47. Pekala R.J., Kumar V.K., Hand J. Subjective experience, expectancy, and hypnosis: Interacting effects. Contemporary Hypnosis 1993, 10:133-143.
48. Pekala R.J., Kumar V.K., Marcano G. Hypnotic types: A partial replication concerning phenomenal experience. Contemporary Hypnosis 1995, 12:194-200.
49. Pekala R.J., Kumar V.K., Maurer R.L., Elliott-Carter N., Moon E., Mullen K. Positive affect, negative affect, and negative effects during a phenomenological hypnotic assessment within a substance abuse population. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 2009, 57:64-93.
50. Perry C. Can anecdotes add to an understanding of hypnosis?. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 2004, 52:218-231.
51. Rainville P., Price D.D. Hypnosis phenomenology and the neurobiology of consciousness. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 2003, 51:105-129.
52. Ramaswamy V., Desarbo W.S., Reibstein D.J., Robinson W.T. An empirical pooling approach for estimating marketing mix elasticities with PIMS Data. Marketing Science 1993, 12:103-124.
53. Ruscio J., Ruscio A.M. Categories and dimensions: Advancing psychological science through the study of latent structure. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2008, 17:203-207.
54. Schwartz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics 1978, 6:461-464.
55. Sclove S.L. Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika 1987, 52:333-343.
56. Smallwood J., Beach E., Schooler J.W., Handy T.C. Going AWOL in the brain: Mind wandering reduces cortical analysis of external events. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2008, 20:458-469.
57. Smallwood J., Fitzgerald A., Miles L.K., Phillips L.H. Shifting moods, wandering minds: Negative moods lead the mind to wander. Emotion 2009, 9:271-276.
58. Spiegel D., Cardeña E. New uses of hypnosis in the treatment of PTSD. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 1990, 51(Suppl):39-43.
59. Terhune, D.B., Cardeña, E., & Lindgren, M. (2009). Typological variability in executive attention in high hypnotic suggestibility. Poster presented at the 20th Annual Convention of the Association for Psychological Science.
60. Terhune, D.B., Cardeña, E., & Lindgren, M. (2010). Dissociative tendencies and individual differences in high hypnotic suggestibility. Submitted for publication.
61. Vermunt J.K., Magidson J. Latent class cluster analysis. Applied latent class analysis 2002, 89-106. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. J.A. Hagenaars, A.L. McCutcheon (Eds.).
62. Weitzenhoffer A.M. Hypnotic susceptibility revisited. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis 1980, 22:130-146.
63. Weitzenhoffer A.M., Hilgard E.R. Stanford hypnotic susceptibility scale: Form C 1962, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.
64. Weitzenhoffer A.M., Hilgard E.R. Revised Stanford profile scales of hypnotic susceptibility: Forms I and II 1967, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.
65. Winkel J.D., Younger J.W., Tomcik N., Borckardt J.J., Nash M.R. Anatomy of a hypnotic response: Self-report estimates, actual behavior, and physiological response to the hypnotic suggestion for arm rigidity. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 2006, 54:186-205.
66. Woody E.Z., Barnier A.J. Hypnosis scales for the twenty-first century: What do we need and how should we use them?. Oxford handbook of hypnosis 2008, 255-281. Oxford University Press, Oxford. M.R. Nash, A. Barnier (Eds.).
67. Woody E.Z., Barnier A.J., McConkey K.M. Multiple hypnotizabilities: Differentiating the building blocks of hypnotic response. Psychological Assessment 2005, 17:200-211.
68. Woody E.Z., Bowers K.S. A frontal assault on dissociated control. Dissociation: Clinical and theoretical perspectives 1994, 52-79. Guilford Press, NY. S.J. Lynn, J.W. Rhue (Eds.).
69. Woody E.Z., Sadler P. Dissociation theories of hypnosis. Oxford handbook of hypnosis 2008, 81-110. Oxford University Press, Oxford. M.R. Nash, A. Barnier (Eds.).