Types of hypnotically (un)susceptible individuals as a function of phenomenological experience: A partial replication

Australian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 92-109

  Forbes, Elizabeth J ^a   Pekala, Ronald J ^b  

^a THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FANTASY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPNOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; NORMAL HUMAN; RATING SCALE;

EID: 0030482874     PISSN: 01560417     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Balthazard, C. G., & Woody, E. Z. (1989). Bimodality, dimensionality, and the notion of hypnotic types. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 37, 70-89.
2. Barber, J. (1989). Invited discussion of Cohen's "Clinical uses of measures of hypnotisability". American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 32, 10-11.
3. Brown, D. P., & Fromm, E. (1986). Hypnotherapy and hypnoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Cohen, S. B. (1989). Clinical uses of measures of hypnotisability. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 32, 4-9.
5. Diamond, M. J. (1989). Is hypnotherapy art or science? American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 32, 11-12.
6. Forbes, E. J., & Pekala, R. J. (1993). Predicting hypnotic susceptibility via a phenomenological approach. Psychological Reports, 73, 1251-1256.
7. Frankel, F. H. (1989). Hypnosis is a multidimensional event. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 32, 13-14.
8. Hand, J., Pekala, R. J., & Kumar, V. K. (1995). Prediction of Harvard and Stanford Scale scores with a phenomenological instrument. Australian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 23, 124-134.
9. Hartigan, J. A. (1975). Clustering algorithms. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
10. Hilgard, E. R. (1965). The experience of hypnosis. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
11. Kumar, V. K., & Pekala, R. J. (1988). Hypnotisability, absorption, and individual differences in phenomenological experience. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 36, 80-88.
12. Kumar, V. K., & Pekala, R. J. (1989). Variations in phenomenological experience as a function of hypnotic susceptibility: A replication. British Journal of Experimental and Clinical Hypnosis, 6, 17-22.
13. Mott, T. (1989). Editorial: Hypnotisability testing and clinical hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 32, 2-3.
14. Pekala, R. J. (1982). The Phenomenology of Consciousness Inventory (PCI). Thorndale, PA: Psychophenomenological Concepts. (Now published by Mid-Atlantic. See Pekala, 1991c).
15. Pekala, R. J. (1991a). Hypnotic types: Evidence from a cluster analysis of phenomenal experience. Contemporary Hypnosis, 8, 95-104.
16. Pekala, R. J. (1991b). Quantifying consciousness: An empirical approach. New York: Plenum Press.
17. Pekala, R. J. (1991c). The Phenomenology of Consciousness Inventory (PCI). West Chester, PA: Mid-Atlantic Educational Institute.
18. Pekala, R. J. (1995a). A short, unobtrusive hypnotic assessment procedure for assessing hypnotisability level: I. Development and research. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 37, 271-282.
19. Pekala, R. J. (1995b). A short, unobtrusive hypnotic induction for assessing hypnotisability level: II. Clinical case reports. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 37, 284-293.
20. Pekala, R. J., & Forbes, E. J. (1988). Hypnoidal effects associated with several stress management techniques. Australian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 16, 121-132.
21. Pekala, R. J., & Forbes, E. J. (1996). Types of hypnotically (unsusceptible individuals as a function of phenomenological experience: Towards a typology of hypnotic types. Manuscript submitted for publication.
22. Pekala, R. J., Forbes, E. J., & Contrisciani, P. (1989). Assessing the phenomenological effects of several stress management strategies. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 88, 263-279.
23. Pekala, R. J., & Kumar, V. K. (1984). Predicting hypnotic susceptibility by a self-report phenomenological state instrument. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 27, 114-121.
24. Pekala, R. J., & Kumar, V. K. (1986). The differential organisation of the structures of consciousness during hypnosis and a baseline condition. Journal of Mind and Behaviour, 7, 515-539.
25. Pekala, R. J., & Kumar, V. K. (1987). Predicting hypnotic susceptibility via a self-report instrument: A replication. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 30, 57-65.
26. Pekala, R. J., & Kumar, V. K. (1988). Patterns of consciousness during hypnosis: Relevance to cognition and individual differences. Australian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 7, 515-540.
27. Pekala, R. J., Kumar, V. K., & Marcano, G. (1995). Hypnotic types: A partial replication concerning phenomenal experience. Contemporary Hypnosis, 12, 194-200.
28. Pekala, R. J., & Nagler, R. (1989). The assessment of hypnoidal states: Rationale and clinical application. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 31, 231-236.
29. Pekala, R. J., Steinberg, J., & Kumar, V. K. (1986). Measurement of phenomenological experience: Phenomenology of Consciousness Inventory. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 63, 983-989.
30. Rossi, E. (1989). Mind-body healing, not suggestion, is the essence of hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 32, 14-15.
31. Shor, R. E., & Orne, E. C. (1962). The Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
32. Spiegel, H. (1989). Should therapists test for hypnotisability? American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 32, 15-16.
33. Wilkinson, L., & Hill, M. (1994). SYSTAT for DOS: Advanced Applications, Version 6 Edition. Evanston, IL: SYSTAT.