Hypnotizability, dissociatmty, and phenomenological experience

Dissociation

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 143-153

  Kumar, V K ^a   Pekala, Ronald J ^b   Marcano, Geddes ^c  

^a WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c Weston Solutions Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000343101     PISSN: 08962863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bernstein, E.M., & Putnam, F.W. (1986). Development, reliability and validity of a dissociation scale. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 174, 727-735. (Pubitemid 17210598)
2. Bowers, K.S. (1992). Do the Stanford scales tap the "classic suggestion effect?" International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 29, 253-275.
3. Bowers, K.S. (1994). Dissociated control, imagination, and the phenomenology of dissociation. In D. Spiegel (Ed.), Dissociation, culture, mind, and body (pp. 21-40). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
4. Carlson, E.B. (1994). Studying the interaction between physical and psychological states with the Dissociative Experience Scale. In D. Spiegel (Ed.), Dissociation, culture, mind, and body. (pp. 41-58). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
5. Carlson, E.B., & Putnam, F.W. (1989). Integrating research on dissociation and hypnotizability: Are there two pathways to hypnotiz-ability? DISSOCIATION, 2, 32-38.
6. Carlson, E.B., & Putnam, F.W. (1993). An update on the Dissociative Experiences Scale. DISSOCIATION, 6, 16-27.
7. Carlson, E.B., Putnam, F.W., Ross, C.A., Torem, M, Coons, P., Dill, D.L., Lowenstein, R.J., & Braun, B.C. (1991). Factor analysis of the Dissociative Experience Scale: A multicenter study. Paper presented at the Eighth International Conference on Multiple Personality and Dissociative States. Chicago, IL.
8. Carlson, E.B., Putnam, F.W., Ross, C.A., Torem, M., Coons, P., Dill, D.L., Lowenstein, R.J., & Braun, B.G. (1993). Validity of the Dissociative Experience Scale in screening for multiple personality disorder: A multicenter study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 1030-1036. (Pubitemid 23198619)
9. Draijer, N., & Boon, S. (1993). The Dissociative Experiences Scale against the criterion of the SCID-D, using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. DISSOCIATION, 6, 28-36.
10. Ellason, J.W., Ross, C.A., Mayran, L.W., & Sainton, K. (1994). Convergent validity of the new form of DES, DISSOCIATION, 7, 101-103.
11. Forbes, E J., & Pekala, RJ. (1993). Predicting hypnotic susceptibility via a phenomenological approach. Psychological Reports, 73, 1251-1256.
12. Frischholz, E.J., Braun, B.J., Sachs, R.G., Hopkins, L., Shaeffer, D. M., Lewis, J., Leavitt, F., Pasquotto,J.N., & Schwartz, D.R. (1990). The Dissociative Experiences Scale: Further replication and validation. DISSOCIATION, 3, 151-153.
13. Frischholz, E J., Braun, B.G., Sachs, R.G., Schwartz, D.R., Lewis, J., Shaeffer, D., Westergaard, C, & Pasquotto,J.N. (1991). Construct validation of the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES): 1. The relation between the DES and other self-report measures of dissociation. DISSOCIATION, 4, 185-188.
14. Frischholz, E.J., Braun, B.G., Sachs, R.G., Schwartz, D.R., Lewis, J., Shaeffer, D., Westergaard, C, & PasquottoJ.N. (1992). Construct validation of the Dissociative Experiences Scale II. Its relationship to hypnotizability. AmericanJournal of Clinical Hypnosis, 35,145-152.
15. Hilgard, E.R. (1986). Divided consciousness: Multiple controls in human thought and action (rev. ed.). New York: Wiley.
16. Kirsch, I., Council, J.R., & Wickless C. (1990). Subjective scoring for the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 38, 112-124. (Pubitemid 20212161)
17. Kumar, V.K., & Pekala, RJ. (1988). Hypnotizability, absorption, and individual differences in phenomenological experience. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 36, 80-88.
18. Kumar, V.K., & Pekala, RJ. (1989). Variations inphenomenologi-cal experience as a function of hypnosis and hypnotic susceptibility: A replication. BritishJournal of Experimental and Clinical Hypnosis, 6, 17-22.
19. Murphy, P.E. (1994). Dissociative experience and dissociative disorders in a non-clinical university student group. DISSOCIATION, 7, 28-34.
20. Nadon, R., Hoyt, LP., Register, P.A., & Kihlstrom, J.F. (1991). Absorption and hypnotizability: Context effects reexamined.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 141-153.
21. Pekala, RJ. (1982). The Phenomenology of Consciousness Inventory. Thorndale, PA: Psychophenomenological Concepts. (Now published by the Mid-Atlantic Educational Institute, West Chester, PA ' [see Pekala, 1991b].)
22. Pekala, RJ. (1991a). Quantifying consciousness: An empirical approach. New York: Plenum.
23. Pekala, RJ. (1991b). The Phenomenology ofConsciousness Inventory. West Chester, PA: The Mid-Atlantic Educational Institute.
24. Pekala, RJ. (1995). A short, unobtrusive hypnotic-assessment procedure for assessing hypnotizability level: I. Development and research. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 37, 271-283.
25. Pekala, R.J., & Forbes, E. (1988). Hypnoidal effects associated with several stress management techniques. Australian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 16, 121-132.
26. Pekala, R.J., & Kumar, V.K. (1984). Predicting hypnotic susceptibility by a self-report phenomenological state instrument. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 27, 114-121. (Pubitemid 15217561)
27. Pekala, R.J., & Kumar, V.K (1986). The differential organization of the structures of consciousness during hypnosis and a baseline condition. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 7, 515-539.
28. Pekala, RJ., & Kumar, V.K (1987). Predicting hypnotic susceptibility via a self-report phenomenological state instrument. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 30, 57-65. (Pubitemid 17122226)
29. Pekala, RJ., & Kumar, V.K (1989). Phenomenological patterns of consciousness during hypnosis: Relevance to cognition and individual differences. Australian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 17, 1-20. (Pubitemid 20086563)
30. Pekala, RJ., & Nagler, R. (1989). The assessment of hypnoidal states: Rationale and clinical application. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 31, 231-236.
31. Pekala, R.J., Steinberg, J., & Kumar, V.K. (1986). Measurement of phenomenological experience: Phenomenology of Consciousness Inventory. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 63, 983-989.
32. Ross, C.A., Joshi, S., & Currie, R. (1990). Dissociation experiences in the general population. American Journal of Psychiatry, 147, 1547-1552.
33. Ross, C.A., Ryan, L., Voigt, H., & Eide, L. (1991). High and low dis-sociators in a college student population. DISSOCIATION, 4,147-151.
34. Sanders, B., McRoberts, G., Tollefson, C. (1989). Childhood stress and dissociation in a college population. DISSOCIATION, 2, 17-23.
35. Shor,E.R.,&Orne,E.C. (1962). The Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychology Press.
36. Smyser, C.J., & Baron, D.A. (1993). Hypnotizability, absorption, and subscales of the Dissociative Experiences Scale in a nonclinical population. DISSOCIATION, 5, 42-46.
37. Tellegen, A., & Atkinson, G. (1974). Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences ("absorption"), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 83, 268-277.
38. Weitzenhoffer, A.M., & Hilgard, E.R. (1962). Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.
39. Westergaard, C, Frischholz, E.J., Braun, B.G., & Sachs, R.G. (November, 1991). The relation between theDissociativeExperiences Scale and hypnotizability. Paper presented at the Eighth International Conference on Multiple Personality and Dissociative States, Chicago, IL.
40. Zamansky, H.S., & Bartis, S.P. (1984). Hypnosis as dissociation: Methodological considerations and preliminary findings. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 26, 246-251. (Pubitemid 14039158)