Positive affect, negative affect, and negative effects during a phenomenological hypnotic assessment within a substance abuse population

International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 64-93

  Pekala, Ronald J ^a   Kumar, V K ^b   Maurer Sr , Ronald L ^a   Elliott Carter, Nancy ^a   Moon, Edward ^a   Mullen, Karen ^a  

^a VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AFFECT; ALCOHOLISM; ANGER; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIZZINESS; DREAM; DRUG DEPENDENCE; FEAR; HAPPINESS; HEADACHE; HUMAN; HYPNOSIS; HYPNOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; LONELINESS; LOVE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NAUSEA; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PANIC; PHENOMENOLOGY; REACTION ANALYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEXUAL AROUSAL; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; THERAPY EFFECT; TREATMENT RESPONSE; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; AFFECT; ALCOHOLISM; CHILD; CHILD ABUSE; DISSOCIATIVE DISORDERS; HUMANS; HYPNOSIS; MALE; PARENTING; PERSONALITY INVENTORY; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; SUGGESTION;

EID: 56749154595     PISSN: 00207144     EISSN: 17445183     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207140802463674     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Angelini, F., Kumar, V. K., & Chandler, L. (1999). The Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility and related instruments: Individual and group assessments. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 47, 236-250.
2. Auerback, A. (1962). Attitudes of psychiatrists to the use of hypnosis. Journal of the American Medical Association, 180, 917-921.
3. Barber, J. (1998). When hypnosis causes trouble. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 46, 157-170.
4. Barrett, D. (1990). Fantasizers and dissociators: Data on two distinct subgroups of deep trance subjects. Psychological Reports, 71, 1011-1014.
5. Barrett, D. (1996). Fantasizers and dissociators: Two types of high hypnotizables, two different imagery styles. In R. G. Kunzendorf, N. P. Spanos, and B. Wallace (Eds.), Hypnosis and imagination (pp. 123-135). Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing.
6. Barušs, I. (2003). Alterations of consciousness. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
7. Bernstein, E. M., & Putnam, F. W. (1986). Development, reliability, and validity of a dissociation scale. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 174, 727-735.
8. Bowers, K. S. (1981). Do the Stanford scales tap the "classic suggestion effect?" International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 29, 42-53.
9. Brentar, J., & Lynn, S. J. (1988). "Negative" effects and hypnosis: A critical examination. British Journal of Experimental and Clinical Hypnosis, 6, 75-84.
10. Brown, D. P., & Fromm, E. (1986). Hypnotherapy and hypnoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Carlson, E. B., & Putnam, F. W. (1992). Manual for the Dissociative Experiences Scale. Unpublished psychological manual. Beloit College, Wisconsin.
12. Coe, W. C., & Ryken, K. (1979). Hypnosis and risks to human subjects. American Psychologist, 34, 673-681.
13. Crawford, H. J., Hilgard, J. R., & Macdonald, H. (1982). Transient experiences following hypnotic testing and special termination procedures. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 30, 117-126.
14. Drum, K. (2003, July 24). Medical malpractice: A convert tells her story. Washington Monthly. Retrieved January 28, 2007, from http://washingtonmonthly.com/archives/ individual/2003_07/001726.php
15. Evans, F. (1979). Hypnosis and sleep: Techniques for exploring cognitive activity during sleep. In E. Fromm & R. E. Shor (Eds.), Hypnosis: Developments in research and new perspectives (pp. 139-183). New York: Aldine.
16. Forbes, E. J., & Pekala, R. J., (1993). Predicting hypnotic susceptibility via a phenomenological approach. Psychological Reports, 73, 1251-1256.
17. Forbes, E. J., & Pekala, R. J. (1996). Types of hypnotically (un)susceptible individuals as a function of phenomenological experience: A partial replication. Australian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 24, 92-109.
18. Freud, S. (1950). Psychopathology of hysteria. In J. Strachey (Trans.), Collected papers of Sigmund Freud (pp. 256-270). London: Hogarth Press.
19. Freud, S. (1953). My views on the part played by sexuality in the etiology of the neuroses. In J. Strachey (Trans.), Collected papers of Sigmund Freud. Volume VII (p. 27). London: Hogarth Press.
20. Grimm, L. G., & Yarnold, R. R. (1995). Reading and understanding multivariate statistics. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
21. Gruzelier, J. (2000). Unwanted effects of hypnosis: A review of the evidence and its implications. Contemporary Hypnosis, 17, 163-193.
22. Hilgard, E. R. (1974). Sequelae to hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 22, 281-298.
23. IJzendoorn, M. H., & Schuengel, C. (1996). The measure of dissociation in normal and clinical populations: A meta-analytic validation of the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES). Clinical Psychology Review, 16, 365-382.
24. Judd, F. K., Burrows, G. D., & Dennerstein, L. (1985). Clinicians' perceptions of the adverse effects of hypnosis: A preliminary study. Australian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 14, 49-60.
25. Kirsch, I. (1991). The social learning theory of hypnosis. In S. J. Lynn & J. W. Rhue (Eds.), Theories of hypnosis: Current models and perspectives (pp. 439-465). New York: Guilford.
26. Kirsch, I. (2000). The response set theory of hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 42, 274-292.
27. Kirsch, I., Council, J. R., & Wickless, C. (1990). Subjective scoring for the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 38, 112-124.
28. Kumar, V. K., Marcano, G., & Pekala, R. J. (1996). Behavioral and subjective scoring of the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility: Further data and an extension. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 38, 191-199.
29. Kumar, V. K., & Pekala, R. J. (1988). Hypnotizability, absorption, and individual differences in phenomenological experience. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 36, 17-22.
30. Kumar, V. K., & Pekala, R. J. (1989). Variations in phenomenological experience as a function of hypnosis and hypnotic susceptibility: A replication. British Journal of Experimental and Clinical Hypnosis, 6, 17-22.
31. Kumar, V. K., Pekala, R. J., & Cummings, J. (1996). Trait factors, state effects, and hypnotizability. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 44, 232-249.
32. Kumar, V. K., Pekala, R. J., & Marcano, G. (1996). Hypnotizability, dissociativity, and phenomenological experience. Dissociation, 9, 143-153.
33. Kumar, V. K., Pekala, R. J., & McCloskey, M. M. (1999). Phenomenological state effects during hypnosis: A cross-validation of findings. Contemporary Hypnosis, 16, 9-22.
34. Levitt, E. E., & Hershman, S. (1963). The clinical practice of hypnosis in the United States: A preliminary survey. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 11, 55-65.
35. Lynn, S. J., & Kirsch, I. (2006). Essentials of clinical hypnosis: An evidence-based approach. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
36. Lynn, S. J., Martin, D. J., & Frauman, D. C. (1996). Does hypnosis pose special risks for negative effects? International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 44, 7-19.
37. MacHovec, F. J., (1986). Hypnosis complications: Prevention and risk management. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
38. Maurer, R. L., Kumar, V. K., Woodside, L., & Pekala, R. J. (1997). Phenomenological experiences in response to monotonous drumming and hypnotizability. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 40, 130-145.
39. McCloskey, M. S., Kumar, V. K., & Pekala, R. J. (1999). State and trait depression, physical and social anhedonia, hypnotizability and subjective experiences during hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 41, 231-252.
40. Ogles, B. M., Lambert, M. J., & Sawyer, D. (1995). The clinical significance of the NIMH treatment of depression collaborative research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 321-326.
41. Orne, M. T. (1965). Undesirable effects of hypnosis: The determinants and management. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 13, 226-237.
42. Page, R. A., & Green, J. (2002). Are recommendations to avoid hypnotic aftereffects being implemented? Contemporary Hypnosis, 19, 167-171.
43. Page, R. A., & Handley, G. W. (1993). The effects of preventive measures in reducing aftereffects to hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 36, 26-37.
44. Pekala, R. J. (1982). The phenomenology of consciousness inventory. Thorndale, PA: Psychophenomenological Concepts. (Now published by Mid-Atlantic Educational Institute. See Pekala, 1991b.)
45. Pekala, R. J. (1991a). Quantifying consciousness: An empirical approach. New York: Plenum.
46. Pekala, R. J. (1991b). The Phenomenology of Consciousness Inventory. West Chester, PA: Mid-Atlantic Educational Institute.
47. Pekala, R. J. (1995a). A short unobtrusive hypnotic induction for assessing hypnotizability level: I. Development and research. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 37, 271-283.
48. Pekala, R. J. (1995b). A short unobtrusive hypnotic induction for assessing hypnotizability level: II. Clinical case reports. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 37, 284-293.
49. Pekala, R. J. (2002). Operationalizing "trance:" II: Clinical application using a psychophenomenological approach. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 44, 241-255.
50. Pekala, R. J., Angelini, F., & Kumar, V. K. (2001). The importance of fantasy proneness in dissociation: A replication. Contemporary Hypnosis, 18, 204-214.
51. Pekala, R. J., & Ersek, B. (1992/1993). Fire-walking versus hypnosis: A preliminary study concerning consciousness, attention, and fire immunity. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 12, 207-229.
52. Pekala, R. J., & Kumar, V. K. (1984). Predicting hypnotic susceptibility by a self-report phenomenological state instrument. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 27, 114-121.
53. Pekala, R. J., & Kumar, V. K. (1986). The differential organization of the structures of consciousness during hypnosis and a baseline condition. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 7, 515-539.
54. Pekala, R. J., & Kumar, V. K. (1987). Predicting hypnotic susceptibility via a self-report instrument: A replication. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 30, 57-65.
55. Pekala, R. J., & Kumar, V. K. (1989). Patterns of consciousness during hypnosis: Relevance to cognition and individual differences. Australian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 17, 1-20.
56. Pekala, R. J., & Kumar, V. K. (2000). Operationalizing "trance" I: Rationale and research using a psychophenomenological approach. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 43, 107-135.
57. Pekala, R. J., & Kumar, V. K. (2005). States, traits, and provocative debates: The state/ nonstate controversy with particular reference to operationalizing "hypnotism." Psychological Hypnosis, Society of Psychological Hypnosis, A Bulletin of Division 30 of the American Psychological Association, 14(1), 13-18.
58. Pekala, R. J., & Kumar, V. K. (2007). An empirical-phenomenological approach to quantifying consciousness and states of consciousness: With particular reference to understanding the nature of hypnosis. In G. Jamieson (Ed.), Towards a cognitive-neuroscience of hypnosis and conscious states: A resource for researchers, students and clinicians (pp. 167-194). London: Oxford University Press.
59. Pekala, R. J., Kumar, V. K., Ainslie, G., Elliott, E. C., Mullen, K. J., Salinger, M. M., et al. (1999-2000). Dissociation as a function of child abuse and fantasy proneness in a substance abuse population. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 19, 105-129.
60. Pekala, R. J., Kumar, V. K., Ainslie, G., Elliott, N. C., Mullen, K. J., Salinger, M. M., et al. (2000). The Child Abuse and Trauma Scale: Reliability, validity, and subtypes in a substance abuse population. Indian Journal of Clinical Psychology, 27, 262-272.
61. Pekala, R. J., Kumar, V. K., & Maurer, R. (2005). The Phenomenology of Consciousness Inventory - Hypnotic Assessment Procedure (PCI-HAP). Unpublished manual.
62. Pekala, R. J., Kumar, V. K., & Maurer, R. (2007). Self-hypnosis relapse prevention therapy. Research study in progress. Coatesville, PA: Coatesville Veterans Administration Medical Center.
63. Pekala, R. J., Kumar, V. K., Maurer, R., Elliott, N. C., Masten, E., Moon, E., et al. (2006). How deeply hypnotized did I get?" Predicting self-reported hypnotic depth from a phenomenological assessment instrument. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 54, 316-339.
64. Pekala, R. J., & Levine, R. L. (1981). Mapping consciousness: Development of an empirical-phenomenological approach. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality: The Scientific Study of Consciousness, 1, 29-47.
65. Pekala, R. J., & Levine, R. L. (1982). Quantifying states of consciousness via an empirical-phenomenological approach. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality: The Scientific Study of Consciousness, 2, 51-71.
66. Pekala, R. J., Maurer, R., Kumar, V. K., Elliott, N. C., Masten, E., Moon, E., et al. (2004). Self-hypnosis relapse prevention training with chronic drug/alcohol users: Effects on self-esteem, affect, and relapse. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 46, 281-297.
67. Pekala, R. J., & Nagler, R. (1989). The assessment of hypnoidal states: Rationale and clinical application. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 31, 231-236.
68. Pekala, R. J., Steinberg, J., & Kumar, V. K. (1986). Measurement of phenomenological experience: Phenomenology of Consciousness Inventory. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 63, 983-989.
69. Pekala, R. J., & Wenger, C. F. (1983). Retrospective phenomenological assessment: Mapping consciousness in reference to specific stimulus conditions. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 4, 247-274.
70. Pekala, R. J., & Wickramasekera, I. (2007). An empirical phenomenological approach to hypnotic assessment: Overview and use of the PCI-HAP as an assessment instrument. Psychological Hypnosis, Society of Psychological Hypnosis, A Bulletin of APA Division 30, 16(2), 4-6, 15-19.
71. Petersen, P., Coe, W. C., Crockford, M., & Decker, S. (1991, August). Hypnotic sequelae revisited. Paper presented at the 99th convention of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco.
72. Plutchik, R. (1997). The circumplex as a general model of the structure of emotions and personality. In R. Plutchik & H. Conte (Eds.), Circumplex models of personality and emotions (pp. 17-45). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
73. Sanders, B., & Becker-Lausen, E. (1995). The measure of psychological maltreatment: Early data on the child abuse and trauma scale. Child Abuse and Neglect, 19, 315-323.
74. Sheehan, P. W., & Dolby, R. M. (1979). Motivated involvement in hypnosis: The illusion of clinical rapport through hypnotic dreams. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 88, 573-583.
75. Shor, R. E., & Orne, E. C. (1962). The Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
76. Shor, R. E., & Orne, E. C. (1965). The nature of hypnosis. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
77. Smith, M. L., Glass, G. V., & Miller, T. I. (1980). The benefits of psychotherapy. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
78. Varga, K., Józsa, E., Bányai E. I., Gösi-Greguss, A. C., & Kumar, V. K. (2001). Phenomenological experiences associated with hypnotic susceptibility. International Journal of Clinical & Experimental Hypnosis, 49, 19-29.
79. Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. (1962). Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
80. Wilkinson, L. (1998). SYSTAT 8.0. Chicago, IL: SPSS.
81. Wilson, C., & Barber, T. X. (1983). The Inventory of Childhood Memories and Imaginings (ICMI). Framingham, MA: Cushing Hospital.
82. Woodside, L. N., Kumar, V. K., & Pekala, R. J. (1997). Monotonous percussion drumming and trance postures: A controlled evaluation of phenomenological effects. Anthropology of Consciousness, 8, 69-87.