Catalytic mechanism of cellulose degradation by a cellobiohydrolase, CelS

PLoS ONE

Volumn 5, Issue 10, 2010, Pages

  Saharay, Moumita ^a   Guo, Hong ^a,b   Smith, Jeremy C ^a,b  

^a OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELLULOSE; CELLULOSE 1,4 BETA CELLOBIOSIDASE;

ARTICLE; BIOFUEL PRODUCTION; CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; ENZYME MECHANISM; ENZYME SUBSTRATE; LIPID HYDROLYSIS; NUCLEOPHILICITY; PROCESS MODEL; PROTEIN CLEAVAGE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTUM MECHANICS; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; CATALYSIS; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; CLOSTRIDIUM THERMOCELLUM; ENZYMOLOGY; HYDROLYSIS; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; QUANTUM THEORY;

CLOSTRIDIUM THERMOCELLUM;

CATALYSIS; CELLULOSE; CELLULOSE 1,4-BETA-CELLOBIOSIDASE; CLOSTRIDIUM THERMOCELLUM; HYDROLYSIS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 78149428734     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012947     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Sticklen M (2008) Plant genetic engineering for biofuel production: towards affordable cellulosic ethanol. Nat Rev Gent 9: 433-443.
2. Himmel M, Ding S, Johnson D, Adney W, Nimlos M, et al. (2007) Biomass recalcitrance: Engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels production. Science 315: 804.
3. Demain A, Newcomb M, Wu J (2005) Cellulase, Clostridia, and Ethanol. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 69: 124.
4. Beguin P, Aubert J (1994) The biological degradation of cellulose. FEMS Microbiol Rev 13: 25-58.
5. Creuzet N, Berenger J, Frixon C (1983) Characterization of exoglucanase and synergistic hydrolysis of cellulose in Clostridium stercorarium. FEMS Microbiol Lett 20: 347-350.
6. Henrissat B, Driguez H, Viet C, Schuelein M (1985) Synergism of cellulases from Trichoderma reesei in the degradation of cellulose. Nat Biotech 3: 722-726.
7. Irwin D, Spezio M, Walker L, Wilson D (1993) Activity studies of eight purified cellulases: Specificity, synergism, and binding domain effects. Biotechnol Bioeng 42: 1002-1013.
8. Vocadlo D, Davies G (2008) Mechanistic insights into glycosidase chemistry. Curr Opin Chem Biol 12: 539-555.
9. Bayer E, Belaich J, Shoham Y, Lamed R (2004) The cellulosomes: multienzyme machines for degradation of plant cell wall polysaccharides. Annu Rev Microbiol 58: 521-554.
10. Bayer E, Shimon L, Shoham Y, Lamed R (1998) Cellulosomes - Structure and Ultrastructure. J Struct Biol 124: 221-234.
11. Shoham Y, Lamed R, Bayer E (1999) The cellulosome concept as an efficient microbial strategy for the degradation of insoluble polysaccharides. Trends Microbiol 7: 275-281.
12. Bégum P, Lemaire M (1996) The cellulosome: an exocellular, multiprotein complex specialized in cellulose degradation. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 31: 201-236.
13. Henrissat B, Bairoch A (1993) New families in the classification of glycosyl hydrolases based on amino acid sequence similarities. Biochem J 293: 781-788.
14. Henrissat B, Bairoch A (1996) Updating the sequence-based classification of glycosyl hydrolases. Biochem J 316: 695-696.
15. Henrissat B (1997) A new cellulase family. Mol Microbiol 23: 848-849.
16. Parsiegla G, Reverbel-Leroy C, Tardif C, Belaich J, Driguez H, et al. (2000) Crystal structures of the cellulase Cel48F in complex with inhibitors and substrates give insights into its processive action. Biochemistry 39: 11238-11246.
17. Meyer J, Schulz G (1997) Energy profile of maltooligosaccharide permeation through maltoporin as derived from the structure and from a statistical analysis of saccharide-protein interactions. Protein Sci 6: 1084-1091.
18. Varrot A, Frandsen T, von Ossowski I, Boyer V, Cottaz S, et al. (2003) Structural basis for ligand binding and processivity in cellobiohydrolase Cel6A from Humicola insolens. Structure 11: 855-864.
19. Clarke A (1997) Biodegradation of Cellulose: Enzymology and biotechnology CRC Press.
20. Koshland D (1953) Stereochemistry and the mechanism of enzymatic reactions. Biol Rev 28: 416-436.
21. Guimarães B, Souchon H, Lytle B, David Wu J, Alzari P (2002) The crystal structure and catalytic mechanism of cellobiohydrolase CelS, the major enzymatic component of the Clostridium thermocellum cellulosome. J Mol Biol 320: 587-596.
22. Davies G, Henrissat B (1995) Structures and mechanisms of glycosyl hydrolases. Structure 3: 853-859.
23. Parsiegla G, Juy M, Reverbel-Leroy C, Tardif C, Belaïch J, et al. (1998) The crystal structure of the processive endocellulase CelF of Clostridium cellulolyticum in complex with a thiooligosaccharide inhibitor at 2.0 A ° resolution. The EMBO Journal 17: 5551-5562.
24. Guérin D, Lascombe M, Costabel M, Souchon H, Lamzin V, et al. (2002) Atomic (0.94 A °) resolution structure of an inverting glycosidase in complex with substrate. J Mol Biol 316: 1061-1069.
25. Parsiegla G, Reverbel C, Tardif C, Driguez H, Haser R (2008) Structures of mutants of cellulase Cel48F of Clostridium cellulolyticum in complex with long Hemithiocellooligosaccharides give rise to a new view of the substrate pathway during processive action. J Mol Biol 375: 499-510.
26. Rouvinen J, Bergfors T, Teeri T, Knowles J, Jones T (1990) Three-dimensional structure of cellobiohydrolase II from Trichoderma reesei. Science 249: 380-386.
27. Harjunpää V, Teleman A, Koivula A, Ruohonen L, Teeri T (1996) Cello- Oligosaccharide hydrolysis by Cellobiohydrolase II from Trichoderma reesei. Eur J Biochem 240: 584-591.
28. Koivula A, Reinikainen T, Ruohonen L, Valkeajarvi A, Claeyssens M, et al. (1996) The active site of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase II: the role of tyrosine 169. Protein Eng Des Sel 9: 691-699.
29. Schindler M, Assaf Y, Sharon N, Chipman D (1977) Mechanism of lysozyme catalysis: role of ground-state strain in subsite D in hen egg-white and human lysozymes. Biochemistry 16: 423-431.
30. Strynadka N, James M (1991) Lysozyme revisited: Crystallographic evidence for distortion of an N-Acetylmuramic acid residue bound in site D. J Mol Biol 220: 401-424.
31. Harris E, Aleshin A, Firsov L, Honzatko R (1993) Refined structure for the complex of 1-deoxynojirimycin with glucoamylase from Aspergillus awamori var. X100 to 2.4A°. resolution. Biochemistry 32: 1618-1626.
32. Petersen L, Ardevol A, Rovira C, Reilly P (2009) Mechanism of cellulose hydrolysis by inverting GH8 Endoglucanase: A QM/MM metadynamics study. J Phys Chem B 113: 7331-7339.
33. Koivula A, Ruohonen L, Wohlfahrt G, Reinikainen T, Teeri T, et al. (2002) The active site of cellobiohydrolase Cel6A from Trichoderma reesei: The roles of Aspartic acids D221 and D175. J Am Chem Soc 124: 10015-10024.
34. Greig I, Williams I (2007) Glycosidase inhibitors as conformational transition state analogues. Chem Commun 2007: 3747-3749.
35. Biarnés X, Ardèvol A, Planas A, Rovira C, Laio A, et al. (2007) The conformational free energy landscape of β-d-Glucopyranose. Implications for substrate preactivation in β-Glucoside hydrolases. J Am Chem Soc 129: 10686-10693.
36. Biarnes X, Nieto J, Planas A, Rovira C (2006) Substrate distortion in the Michaelis complex of Bacillus 1, 3-1, 4-beta-Glucanase: Insight from first principle molecular dynamics simulations. J Biol Chem 281: 1432.
37. Watson J, Dookhun V, Borgford T, Bennet A, et al. (2003) Mutagenesis of the conserved active-site Tyrosine changes a retaining sialidase into an inverting sialidase. Biochemistry 42: 12682-12690.
38. Ensing B, Klein M (2005) Perspective on the reactions between F-and CH3CH2F: The free energy landscape of the E2 and SN2 reaction channels. Proc Nat Aca Sci USA 102: 6755-6759.
39. Sheppard A, Acevedo O (2009) Multidimensional exploration of valley-ridge inflection points on potential-energy surfaces. J Am Chem Soc 131: 2530-2540.
40. Zhang Y, Liu H, Yang W (2000) Free energy calculation on enzyme reactions with an efficient iterative procedure to determine minimum energy paths on a combined ab initio QM/MM potential energy surface. J Chem Phys 112: 3483-3492.
41. Torrie G, Valleau J (1974) Monte Carlo free energy estimates using non- Boltzmann sampling: Application to the sub-critical Lennard-Jones fluid. Chem Phys Lett 28: 578-581.
42. Kumar S, Rosenberg J, Bouzida D, Swendsen R, Kollman P (1992) The weighted histogram analysis method for free-energy calculations on biomolecules. I. The method. J Comput Chem 13: 1011-1021.
43. Davies G, Mackenzie L, Varrot A, Dauter A, Brzozowski A, et al. (1998) Snapshots along an enzymatic reaction coordinate: Analysis of a retaining β- Glycoside Hydrolase. Biochemistry 37: 11707-11713.
44. Cremer D, Pople J (1975) General definition of ring puckering coordinates. J Am Chem Soc 97: 1354-1358.
45. Davies G, Ducros V, Varrot A, Zechel D (2003) Mapping the conformational itinerary of β-glycosidases by X-ray crystallography. Biochem Soc Trans 31: 523-527.
46. Ly H, Withers S (1999) Mutagenesis of glycosidases. Annu Rev Biochem 68: 487-522.
47. Sinnott M (1990) Catalytic mechanism of enzymic glycosyl transfer. Chem Rev 90: 1171-1202.
48. Brooks B, Bruccoleri R, Olafson B, States D, Swaminathan S, et al. (1983) CHARMM: a program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J Comput Chem 4: 187-217.
49. Jorgensen W, Chandrasekhar J, Madura J, Impey R, Klein M (1983) Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phy 79: 926-935.
50. Phillips J, Braun R, Wang W, Gumbart J, Tajkhorshid E, et al. (2005) Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J Comput Chem 26: 1781-1802.
51. Swope W, Andersen H, Berens P, Wilson K (1982) A computer simulation method for the calculation of equilibrium constants for the formation of physical clusters of molecules: Application to small water clusters. J Chem Phys 76: 637-649.
52. Essmann U, Perera L, Berkowitz M, Darden T, Lee H, et al. (1995) A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. J Chem Phys 103: 8577.
53. Warshel A, Levitt M (1976) Theoretical studies of enzymic reactions: dielectric, electrostatic and steric stabilization of the carbonium ion in the reaction of Lysozyme. J Mol Bio 103: 227-249.
54. Cui Q, Elstner M, Kaxiras E, Frauenheim T, Karplus M (2001) A QM/MM Implementation of the self-consistent charge density functional tight binding (SCC-DFTB) method. J Phys Chem B 105: 569-585.
55. Banerjee A, Yang W, Karplus M, Verdine G (2005) Structure of a repair enzyme interrogating undamaged DNA elucidates recognition of damaged DNA. Nature 434: 612-618.
56. Guo H, Cui Q, Lipscomb W, Karplus M (2001) Substrate conformational transitions in the active site of chorismate mutase: Their role in the catalytic mechanism. Proc Nat Aca Sci USA 98: 9032.
57. Formaneck M, Li G, Zhang X, Cui Q (2002) Calculating accurate redox potentials in enzymes with a combined QM/MM free energy perturbation approach. J Theo Comput Chem 1: 53-68.
58. Riccardi D, Konig P, Guo H, Cui Q, et al. (2008) Proton transfer in Carbonic anhydrase is controlled by electrostatics rather than the orientation of the acceptor. Biochemistry 47: 2369-2378.
59. Li G, Cui Q (2003) What is so special about Arg55 in the catalysis of cyclophilin A? Insights from hybrid QM/MM simulations. J Am Chem Soc 125: 15028-15038.
60. Bondar A, Elstner M, Suhai S, Smith J, Fischer S (2004) Mechanism of primary proton transfer in bacteriorhodopsin. Structure 12: 1281-1288.
61. Elstner M, Frauenheim T, Suhai S (2003) An approximate DFT method for QM/MM simulations of biological structures and processes. Journal of Molecular Structure: THEOCHEM 632: 29-41.
62. Sattelmeyer K, Tirado-Rives J, Jorgensen W (2006) Comparison of SCC-DFTB and NDDO-based semiempirical molecular orbital methods for organic molecules. J Phys Chem A 110: 13551-13559.
63. Singh U, Kollman P (1986) A combined ab initio quantum mechanical and molecular mechanical method for carrying out simulations on complex molecular systems: Applications to the CH3Cl+Cl- exchange reaction and gas phase protonation of polyethers. J Comput Chem 7: 718-730.
64. Jorgensen W, Chandrasekhar J, Madura J, Impey R, Klein M (1983) Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys 79: 926-935.
65. Brooks III C, Brunger A, Karplus M (1985) Active site dynamics in protein molecules: a stochastic boundary molecular-dynamics approach. Biopolymers 24: 843-865.
66. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K (1996) VMD - Visual Molecular Dynamics. J Mol Graphics 14: 33-38.