Factors influencing the relative fitness of hatchery and wild spring Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in the Wenatchee River, Washington, USA

Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences

Volumn 67, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 1840-1851

  Williamson, Kevin S ^a   Murdoch, Andrew R ^b   Pearsons, Todd N ^b,c   Ward, Eric J ^a   Ford, Michael J ^a  

^a NORTHWEST FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE   (United States)

^c Grant County Public Utility District   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FITNESS; HATCHERY; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; MALE BEHAVIOR; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SALMONID; SPAWNING;

UNITED STATES; WASHINGTON [UNITED STATES]; WENATCHEE RIVER;

ONCORHYNCHUS TSHAWYTSCHA; SALMONIDAE;

EID: 78149386235     PISSN: 0706652X     EISSN: 12057533     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/F10-099     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Araki, H., Ardren, W.R., Olsen, E., Cooper, B., and Blouin, M.S. 2007a. Reproductive success of captive-bred steelhead trout in the wild: evaluation of three hatchery programs in the Hood River. Conserv. Biol. 21(1): 181-190. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739. 2006.00564.x. PMID:17298524.
2. Araki, H., Cooper, B., and Blouin, M.S. 2007b. Genetic effects of captive breeding cause a rapid, cumulative fitness decline in the wild. Science (Washington, D.C.), 318(5847): 100-103. doi:10. 1126/science.1145621. PMID:17916734.
3. Araki, H., Waples, R.S., Ardren, W.R., Cooper, B., and Blouin, M.S. 2007c. Effective population size of steelhead trout: influence of variance in reproductive success, hatchery programs, and genetic compensation between life-history forms. Mol. Ecol. 16(5): 953-966. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006. 03206.x. PMID:17305853.
4. Araki, H., Berejikian, B.A., Ford, M.J., and Blouin, M.S. 2008. Fitness of hatchery-reared salmonids in the wild. Evol. Appl. 1(2): 342-355. doi:10.1111/j.1752-4571.2008.00026.x.
5. Banks, M.A., Blouin, M.S., Baldwin, B.A., Rashbrook, V.K., Fitzgerald, H.A., Blankenship, S.M., and Hedgecock, D. 1999. Isolation and inheritance of novel microsatellites in chinook salmon. J. Hered. 90(2): 281-288. doi:10.1093/jhered/90.2.281.
6. Beamish, R.J., Mahnken, C., and Neville, C.M. 1997. Hatchery and wild production of Pacific salmon in relation to large-scale, natural shifts in the productivity of the marine environment. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 54(6): 1200-1215. doi:10.1016/S1054-3139(97)80027-6.
7. Burck, W.A. 1967. Mature stream-reared spring chinook salmon. Oregon Fish Commission Research Briefs, 13: 128.
8. Cairney, M., Taggart, J.B., and Høyheim, B. 2000. Characterization of microsatellite and minisatellite loci in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) and cross-species amplification in other salmonids. Mol. Ecol. 9(12): 2175-2178. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X.2000.105312.x. PMID:11123640.
9. Fleming, I.A., and Gross, M.R. 1989. Evolution of adult female life history and morphology in a Pacific salmon (coho: Oncorhynchus kisutch). Evolution, 43(1): 141-157. doi:10.2307/2409170.
10. Fleming, I.A., and Gross, M.R. 1992. Reproductive behavior of hatchery and wild coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch): does it differ? Aquaculture, 103(2): 101-121. doi:10.1016/0044-8486(92)90405-A.
11. Fleming, I.A., Hindar, K., Mjolnerod, I.B., Jonsson, B., Balstad, T., and Lamberg, A. 2000. Lifetime success and interactions of farm salmon invading a native population. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 267(1452): 1517-1523. doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1173.
12. Ford, M.J. 2002. Selection in captivity during supportive breeding may reduce fitness in the wild. Conserv. Biol. 16(3): 815-825. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00257.x.
13. Ford, M.J., and Williamson, K.S. 2009. The aunt and uncle effect revisited - the effect of biased parentage assignment on fitness estimation in a supplemented salmon population. J. Hered. 101(1): 33-41. doi:10.1093/jhered/esp068.
14. Ford, M., Fuss, H., Boelts, B., LaHood, E., Hard, J., and Miller, J. 2006. Changes in run timing and natural smolt production in a naturally spawning coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) population after 60 years of intensive hatchery supplementation. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 63(10): 2343-2355. doi:10.1139/F06-119.
15. Fritts, A.L., Scott, J.L., and Pearsons, T.N. 2007. The effects of domestication on the relative vulnerability of hatchery and wild origin spring Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) to predation. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 64(5): 813-818. doi:10.1139/F07-057.
16. Gerber, S., Mariette, S., Streiff, R., Bodénès, C., and Kremer, A. 2000. Comparison of microsatellites and amplified fragment length polymorphism markers for parentage analysis. Mol. Ecol. 9(8): 1037-1048. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.00961.x. PMID: 10964223.
17. Gerber, S., Chabrier, P., and Kremer, A. 2003. FaMoz: a software for parentage analysis using dominant, codominant and uniparentally inherited markers. Mol. Ecol. Notes, 3(3): 479-481. doi:10.1046/j.1471-8286.2003.00439.x.
18. Greig, C., and Banks, M.A. 1999. Five multiplexed microsatellite loci for rapid response run identification of California's endangered winter Chinook salmon. Anim. Genet. 30(4): 318-324. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2052.1999.00445-3.x.
19. Greig, C., Jacobson, D.P., and Banks, M.A. 2003. New tetranucleotide microsatellites for fine-scale discrimination among endangered chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Mol. Ecol. Notes, 3(3): 376-379. doi:10.1046/j.1471-8286.2003.00455.x.
20. Healey, M.C. 1983. Coastwide distribution and ocean migration patterns of streamand ocean-type chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha. Can. Field Nat. 97: 427-433.
21. Healey, M.C. 1991. The life history of chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). In Life history of Pacific salmon. Edited by C. Groot and L. Margolis. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, B.C. pp. 311-394.
22. Hill, M.S., Zydlewski, G.B., and Gale, W.L. 2006. Comparisons between hatchery and wild steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) smolts: physiology and habitat use. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 63(7): 1627-1638. doi:10.1139/F06-061.
23. Hoffnagle, T.L., Carmichael, R.W., Frenyea, K.A., and Keniry, P.J. 2008. Run timing, spawn timing, and spawning distribution of hatchery-and natural-origin spring Chinook salmon in the Imnaha River, Oregon. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 28(1): 148-164. doi:10.1577/M05-145.1.
24. Independent Scientific Advisory Board. 2003. Review of salmon and steelhead supplementation, Portland. Available from http:// www.nwcouncil.org/library/isab/isab2003-3.htm.
25. Independent Scientific Advisory Board. 2005. Monitoring and evaluation of supplementation projects. Available from http://www.nwcouncil.org/library/isrp/isrp2005-15.htm.
26. Jamieson, A., and Taylor, S.C. 1997. Comparisons of three probability formulae for parentage exclusion. Anim. Genet. 28(6): 397-400. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2052.1997.00186.x. PMID: 9616104.
27. Knudsen, C.M., Schroder, S.L., Busack, C.A., Johnston, M.V., Pearsons, T.N., Bosch, W.J., and Fast, D.E. 2006. Comparison of life history traits between first-generation hatchery and wild upper Yakima River spring Chinook salmon. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 135(4): 1130-1144. doi:10.1577/T05-121.1.
28. Kostow, K., Marshall, A., and Phelps, S. 2003. Naturally spawning hatchery steelhead contribute to smolt production but experience low reproductive success. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 132(4): 780-790. doi:10.1577/T02-051.
29. LaHood, E.S., Miller, J.J., Apland, C., and Ford, M.J. 2008. A rapid, ethanol-free fish tissue collection method for molecular genetic analyses. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 137(4): 1104-1107. doi:10.1577/T07-181.1.
30. Lande, R., and Arnold, S.J. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution, 37(6): 1210-1226. doi:10.2307/ 2408842.
31. Leider, S.A., Hulett, P.L., Loch, J.J., and Chilcote, M.W. 1990. Electrophoretic comparison of the reproductive success of naturally spawning transplanted and wild steelhead trout through the returning adult stage. Aquaculture, 88(3-4): 239-252. doi:10.1016/0044-8486(90)90151-C.
32. Lynch, M., and O'Hely, H. 2001. Captive breeding and the genetic fitness of natural populations. Conserv. Genet. 2(4): 363-378. doi:10.1023/A:1012550620717.
33. Mallinson, J.J.C. 1995. Conservation breeding programmes: an important ingredient for species survival. Biodivers. Conserv. 4(6): 617-635. doi:10.1007/BF00222518.
34. McClure, M.M., Holmes, E.E., Sanderson, B.L., and Jordan, C.E. 2003. A large-scale, multispecies status assessment: anadromous salmonids in the Columbia River Basin. Ecol. Appl. 13(4): 964-989. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2003)13[964:ALMSAA]2.0.CO;2.
35. Meagher, T.R., and Thompson, E. 1986. The relationship between single parent and parent pair genetic likelihoods in genealogy reconstruction. Theor. Popul. Biol. 29(1): 87-106. doi:10.1016/ 0040-5809(86)90006-7.
36. Mobrand, L.E., Barr, J., Blankenship, L., Campton, D.E., Evelyn, T.T.P., Flagg, T.A., Mahnken, C.V.W., Seeb, L.W., Seidel, P.R., and Smoker, W.W. 2005. Hatchery reform in Washington State: principles amd emerging issues. Fisheries, 30(6): 11-33. doi:10.1577/1548-8446(2005)30[11:HRIWS]2.0.CO;2.
37. Morgan, M.T., and Conner, J.K. 2001. Using genetic markers to directly estimate male selection gradients. Evolution, 55(2): 272-281. PMID:11308085.
38. Mullan, J.W., Williams, K.R., Rhodus, G., Hillman, T.W., and McIntryre, J.D. 1992. Production and habitat of salmonids in mid-Columbia River tributary streams. US Fish. Wildl. Serv. Monograph I.
39. Murdoch, A., Pearsons, T., Maitland, T., Ford, M., and Williamson, K. 2008. Monitoring the reproductive success of naturally spawning hatchery and natural spring Chinook salmon in the Wenatchee River. BPA Project No. 2003-039-00. Bonneville Power Administration, Portland, Ore. Available from http://pisces.bpa.gov/release/documents/documentviewer.aspx?doc=P106770.
40. Myers, J.M., Kope, R.G., Bryant, G.J., Teel, D., Lierheimer, L.J., Wainwright, T.C., Grant, W.S., Waknitz, F.W., Neely, K., Lindley, S.T., and Waples, R.S. 1998. Status review of chinook salmon from Washington, Idaho, Oregon and California. NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-NWFSC-35.
41. Naish, K.A., and Park, L.K. 2002. Linkage relationships for 35 new microsatellite loci in chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha. Anim. Genet. 33(4): 316-318. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2052.2002.t01-4-00886.x. PMID:12139517.
42. Naish, K.A., Taylor, J.E., III, Levin, P.S., Quinn, T.P., Winton, J.R., Huppert, D., and Hilborn, R. 2007. An evaluation of the effects of conservation and fishery enhancement hatcheries on wild populations of salmon. Adv. Mar. Biol. 53: 61-194. doi:10.1016/S0065-2881(07)53002-6.
43. National Research Council. 1996. Upstream: salmon and society in the Pacific Northwest. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
44. Nelson, R.J., and Beacham, T.D. 1999. Isolation and cross species amplification of microsatellite loci useful for study of Pacific salmon. Anim. Genet. 30(3): 228-244. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2052. 1999.00404-4.x. PMID:10442988.
45. Nielsen, R., Mattila, D.K., Clapham, P.J., and Palsbøll, P.J. 2001. Statistical approaches to paternity analysis in natural populations and applications to the North Atlantic humpback whale. Genetics, 157(4): 1673-1682. PMID:11290722.
46. Olsen, J.B., Bentzen, P., and Seeb, J.E. 1998. Characterization of seven microsatellite loci derived from pink salmon. Mol. Ecol. 7(8): 1087-1089. PMID:9711869.
47. Pearsons, T.N., Fritts, A.L., and Scott, J.L. 2007. The effects of hatchery domestication on competitive dominance of juvenile spring Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 64(5): 803-812. doi:10.1139/F07-058.
48. Quinn, T.P. 1993. A review of homing and straying of wild and hatchery-produced salmon. Fish. Res. 18(1-2): 29-44. doi:10.1016/0165-7836(93)90038-9.
49. Quinn, T.P. 2005. The behavior and ecology of Pacific salmon and trout. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Md.
50. Quinn, T.P., and Fresh, K. 1984. Homing and straying in chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) from Cowlitz River hatchery, Washington. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 41(7): 1078-1082. doi:10.1139/f84-126.
51. Reisenbichler, R.R., and McIntyre, J.D. 1977. Genetic differences in growth and survival of juvenile hatchery and wild steelhead trout, Salmo gairdneri. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 34: 123-128.
52. Rich, W.H. 1920. Early history and seaward migration of Chinook salmon in the Columbia and Sacramento Rivers. Bull. Bureau Fish. Vol. 37.
53. Riddell, B.E., and Swain, D.P. 1991. Competition between hatchery and wild coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch): genetic variation for agonistic behaviour in newly-emerged wild fry. Aquaculture, 98(1-3): 161-172. doi:10.1016/0044-8486(91)90381-G.
54. Sancristobal, M., and Chevalet, C. 1997. Error tolerant parent identification from a finite set of individuals. Genet. Res. 70(1): 53-62. doi:10.1017/S0016672397002851.
55. Schroder, S.L., Knudsen, C.M., Pearsons, T.N., Kassler, T.W., Young, S.F., Busack, C.A., and Fast, D.E. 2008. Breeding success of wild and first-generation hatchery female spring Chinook salmon spawning in an artificial stream. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 137(5): 1475-1489. doi:10.1577/T07-123.1.
56. Schwenke, P.L., Rhydderch, J.G., Ford, M.J., Marshall, A.R., and Park, L.K. 2006. Forensic identification of endangered Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) using a multilocus SNP assay. Conserv. Genet. 7(6): 983-989. doi:10.1007/s10592-006-9133-x.
57. Seamons, T.R., Bentzen, P., and Quinn, T.P. 2004. The effects of adult length and arrival date on individual reproductive success in wild steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 61(2): 193-204. doi:10.1139/f03-158.
58. Upper Columbia Salmon Recovery Board. 2007. Upper Columbia spring Chinook salmon and steelhead recovery plan. Available from http://www.ucsrb.com/theplan.asp.
59. Utter, F.M., Chapman, D.W., and Marshal, A.R. 1995. Genetic population structure and history of chinook salmon of the Upper Columbia River. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp. 17: 149-168.
60. Winans, G.A., Paquin, M.M., Van Doornik, D.M., Baker, B.M., Thornton, P., Rawding, D., Marshall, A., Moran, P., and Kalinowski, S. 2004. Genetic stock identification of steelhead in the Columbia River Basin: an evaluation of different molecular markers. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 24(2): 672-685. doi:10. 1577/M03-052.1.