The aunt and uncle effect revisited - The effect of biased parentage assignment on fitness estimation in a supplemented salmon population

Journal of Heredity

Volumn 101, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 33-41

  Ford, Michael J ^a   Williamson, Kevin S ^a  

^a ALASKA FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Fitness; Hatchery; Parentage; Propagation; Reproductive success; Salmon

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FITNESS; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GRANDPARENT; MALE; MICROSATELLITE MARKER; NONHUMAN; PARENTHOOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROGENY; SALMON; SIMULATION;

ANIMALS; REPRODUCTION; SALMON;

EID: 72749091705     PISSN: 00221503     EISSN: 14657333     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esp068     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Anderson EC, Garza JC. 2006. The power of single-nucleotide polymorphisms for large-scale parentage inference. Genetics. 172:2567-2582.
2. Araki H, Ardren W, Olsen E, Cooper B, Blouin M. 2007. Reproductive success of captive-bred steelhead trout in the wild: Evaluation of three hatchery programs in the Hood River. Conserv Biol. 21:181-190.
3. Araki H, Berejikian BA, Ford MJ, Blouin MS. 2008. Fitness of hatcheryreared salmonids in the wild. Evol Appl. 1:342-355.
4. Araki H, Blouin MS. 2005. Unbiased estimation of relative reproductive success of different groups: Evaluation and correction of bias caused by parentage assignment errors. Mol Ecol. 14:4097-4109.
5. Araki H, Cooper B, Blouin MS. 2007. Genetic effects of captive breeding cause a rapid, cumulative fitness decline in the wild. Science. 318:100-103.
6. Avise JC. 1994. Molecular markers, natural history and evolution. New York: Chapman & Hall.
7. Banks MA, Blouin MS, Baldwin BA, Rashbrook VK, Fitzgerald HA, Blankenship SM, Hedgecock D. 1999. Isolation and inheritance of novel microsatellites in chinook salmon. J Hered. 90:281-288.
8. Brannon EL, Amend DF, Cronin MA, Lannan JE, LaPatra S, McNeil WJ, Noble RE, Smith CE, Talbot AJ, Wedemeyer GA, et al. 2004. The controversy about salmon hatcheries. Fisheries. 29:12-31.
9. Cairney M, Taggart JB, Hoyheim B. 2000. Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) and cross-species amplification in other salmonids. Mol Ecol. 9:2175-2178.
10. Chilcote MW. 2003. Relationship between natural productivity and the frequency of wild fish in mixed spawning populations of wild and hatchery steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 60:1057-1067.
11. Conway WG. 1980. An overview of captive propagation. In: Soule ME, Wilcox BA, editors. Conservation biology: An evolutionary-ecological perspective. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer. p. 199-208.
12. Devlin B, Roeder K, Ellstrand NC. 1988. Fractional paternity assignment: Theoretical development and comparison to other methods. Theor Appl Genet. 76:369-380.
13. Ford MJ, Fuss H, Boelts B, LaHood E, Hard J, Miller J. 2006. Changes in run timing and natural smolt production in a naturally spawning coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) population after 60 years of intensive hatchery supplementation. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 63:2343-2355.
14. Ford MJ. 2002. Selection in captivity during supportive breeding may reduce fitness in the wild. Conserv Biol. 16:815-825.
15. Garant D, Kruuk LEB. 2005. How to use molecular marker data to measure evolutionary parameters in wild populations. Mol Ecol. 14:1843-1859.
16. Gerber S, Chabrier P, Kremer A. 2003. FaMoz: A software for parentage analysis using dominant, codominant and uniparentally inherited markers. Mol Ecol Notes. 3:479-481.
17. Gerber S, Mariette S, Streiff R, Bodenes C, Kremer A. 2000. Comparison of microsatellites and amplified fragment length polymorphism markers for parentage analysis. Mol Ecol. 9:1037-1048.
18. Greig C, Banks MA. 1999. Five multiplexed microsatellite loci for rapid response run identification of California's endangered winter Chinook salmon. Anim Genet. 30:316-324.
19. Greig C, Jacobson DP, Banks MA. 2003. New tetranucleotide microsatellites for fine-scale discrimination among endangered chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Mol Ecol Notes. 3:376-379.
20. Hadfield JD, Richardson DS, Burke T. 2006. Towards unbiased parentage assignment: Combining genetic, behavioural and spatial data in a Bayesian framework. Mol Ecol. 15:3715-3730.
21. Hill WG. 1981. Estimation of effective population-size from data on linkage disequilibrium. Genet Res. 38:209-216.
22. Hindar K, Ryman N, Utter F. 1991. Genetic effects of cultured fish on natural fish populations. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 48:945-957.
23. Jabbour HN, Hayssen V, Bruford MW. 1997. Conservation of deer: Contributions from molecular biology, evolutionary ecology, and reproductive physiology. J Zool. 243:461-484.
24. Jones AG, Ardren WR. 2003. Methods of parentage analysis in natural populations. Mol Ecol. 12:2511-2523.
25. Lahood ES, Miller JJ, Apland C, Ford MJ. 2008. A rapid, ethanol-free fish tissue collection method for molecular genetic analyses. Trans Am Fish Soc. 137:1104-1107.
26. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Pemberton JM. 1998. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol. 7:639-655.
27. McClure MM, Holmes EE, Sanderson BL, Jordan CE. 2003. A large-scale, multispecies status assessment: Anadromous salmonids in the Columbia River Basin. Ecol Appl. 13:964-989.
28. Meagher TR, Thompson E. 1986. The relationship between single parent and parent pair genetic likelihoods in genealogy reconstruction. Theor Popul Biol. 29:87-106.
29. Mobrand LE, Barr J, Blankenship L, Campton DE, Evelyn TTP, Flagg TA, Mahnken CVW, Seeb LW, Seidel PR, Smoker WW. 2005. Hatchery reform in Washington State: Principles and emerging issues. Fisheries. 30:11-33.
30. Naish KA, Park LK. 2002. Linkage relationships for 35 new microsatellite loci in chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha. Animal Genetics. 33: 316-318.
31. Naish KA, Taylor JE, Levin PS, Quinn TP, Winton JR, Huppert D, Hilborn R. 2008. An evaluation of the effects of conservation and fishery enhancement hatcheries on wild populations of salmon. Adv Mar Biol. 53:61-194.
32. Nei M. 1987. Molecular evolutionary genetics. New York: Columbia University Press.
33. Nelson RJ, Beacham TD. 1999. Isolation and cross species amplification of microsatellite loci useful for study of Pacific salmon. Anim Genet. 30:225-244.
34. Olney PJS, Mace GM, Feistner ATC. 1994. Creative conservation interactive management of wild and captive animals. London: Chapman & Hall.
35. Olsen JB, Bentzen P, Seeb JE. 1998. Characterization of seven microsatellite loci derived from pink salmon. Mol Ecol. 7:1087-1089.
36. Olsen JB, Busack C, Britt J, Bentzen P. 2001. The aunt and uncle effect: An empirical evaluation of the confounding influence of full sibs of parents on pedigree reconstruction. J Hered. 92:243-247.
37. Reisenbichler RR, McIntyre JD. 1977. Genetic differences in growth and survival of juvenile hatchery and wild steelhead trout, Salmo gairdneri. J Fish Res Board of Canada. 34:123-128.
38. Seamons TR, Bentzen P, Quinn TP. 2004. The effects of adult length and arrival date on individual reproductive success in wild steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 61:193-204.
39. Smith BR, Herbinger CM, Merry HR. 2001. Accurate partition of individuals into full sib families from genetic data without parental information. Genetics. 158:1329-1338.
40. Smouse PE, Meagher TR. 1994. Genetic analysis of male reproductive contributions in Chamaelirium luteum (L.) Gray (Liliaceae). Genetics. 136:313-322.
41. Waples RS. 2006. A bias correction for estimates of effective population size based on linkage disequilibrium at unlinked gene loci. Conserv Genet. 7:167-184.
42. Waples RS, Do C. 2008. LDNE: A program for estimating effective population size from data on linkage disequilibrium. Mol Ecol Res. 8:753-756.
43. Winans GA, Paquin MM, Van Doornik DM, Baker BM, Thornton P, Rawding D, Marshall A, Moran P, Kalinowski S. 2004. Genetic stock identification of steelhead in the Columbia River Basin: An evaluation of different molecular markers. N Am J Fish Manage. 24:672-685.