Effective population size of steelhead trout: Influence of variance in reproductive success, hatchery programs, and genetic compensation between life-history forms

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 953-966

  Araki, Hitoshi ^a   Waples, Robin S ^b   Ardren, William R ^a,c   Cooper, Becky ^a   Blouin, Michael S ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTHWEST FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^c ABERNATHY FISH TECHNOLOGY CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Effective population size; Genetic compensation; Microsatellite; Oncorhynchus mykiss; Parentage analysis; Salmonid

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BREEDING; GENETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION MIGRATION; RAINBOW TROUT; REPRODUCTION; RIVER; SEX RATIO; UNITED STATES;

ANIMAL MIGRATION; ANIMALS; BREEDING; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; ONCORHYNCHUS MYKISS; OREGON; POPULATION DENSITY; REPRODUCTION; RIVERS; SEX RATIO;

ONCORHYNCHUS MYKISS; SALMONIDAE;

EID: 33847032038     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: 1365294X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03206.x     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Anderson EC (2001) Monte Carlo methods for inference in population genetic models. PhD Dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.
2. Araki H, Blouin MS (2005) Unbiased estimation of relative reproductive success of different groups: evaluation and correction of bias caused by parentage assignment errors. Molecular Ecology, 14, 4097-4109.
3. Araki H, Ardren WR, Olsen E, Cooper B, Blouin MS (2006) Reproductive success of captive-bred steelhead trout in the wild: Evaluation of three hatchery programs in the Hood River. Conservation Biology, published online, DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00564.x.
4. Ardren WR, Kapuscinski AR (2003) Demographic and genetic estimates of effective population size (Ne) reveals genetic compensation in steelhead trout. Molecular Ecology, 12, 35-49.
5. Ballou JD, Foose TJ (1996) Demographic and genetic management of captive populations. In: Wild Mammals in Captivity (eds Kleinman DG, Allen ME, Thompson KV, Lumpkin S), pp. 263-283. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
6. Caballero A (1994) Developments in the prediction of effective population size. Heredity, 73 (6), 657-679.
7. Clutton-Brock TH (1988) Reproductive Success: Studies of Individual Variation in Contrasting Breeding Systems. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
8. Crow JF, Kimura M (1970) An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. Harper & Row, New York.
9. Crow JF, Morton NE (1955) Measurement of gene frequency drift in small populations. Evolution, 9, 202-214.
10. Cuenco ML, Barkman TWH, Mundy PR (1993) The Use of Supplementation to Aid in Natural Stock Restoration. In: Genetic Conservation of Salmonid Fishes (eds Cloud JG, Thorgaard GH), pp. 269-294. Plenum Press, New York.
11. Duchesne P, Bernatchez L (2002) An analytical investigation of the dynamics of inbreeding in multi-generation supportive breeding. Conservation Genetics, 3, 45-58.
12. Frankham R (1995a) Conservation genetics. Annual Review of Genetics, 29, 305-327.
13. Frankham R (1995b) Effective population size/adult population size ratios in wildlife: a review. Genetical Research, 66, 95-107.
14. Frankham R, Briscoe DA, Ballou JD (2002) Introduction to Conservation Genetics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
15. Fraser DJ, Jones MW, McParland TL, Hutchings JA (2006) Loss of historical immigration and the unsuccessful rehabilitation of extirpated salmon populations. Conservation Genetics, online early DOI 10.1007/s10592-006- 9188-8.
16. Garant D, Dodson JJ, Bernatchez L (2001) A genetic evaluation of mating system and determinants of individual reproductive success in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). The Journal of Heredity, 92, 137-145.
17. Garant D, Dodson JJ, Bernatchez L (2003) Differential reproductive success and heritability of alternative reproductive tactics in wild Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Evolution, 57, 1133-1141.
18. Garcia-Vazquez E, Moran P, Martinez JL et al. (2001) Alternative mating strategies in Atlantic salmon and brown trout. The Journal of Heredity, 92, 146-149.
19. Gautschi B, Muller JP, Schmid B, Shykoff JA (2003) Effective number of breeders and maintenance of genetic diversity in the captive bearded vulture population. Heredity, 91, 9-16.
20. Hansen MM, Ruzzante DE, nielsen EE, Mensberg KL (2000) Microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA polymorphism reveals life-history dependent interbreeding between hatchery and wild brown trout (Salmo trutta L.). Molecular Ecology, 9, 583-594.
21. Hauser L, Adcock GJ, Smith PJ, Ramirez JH, Carvalho GR (2002) Loss of microsatellite diversity and low effective population size in an overexploited population of New Zealand snapper (Pagrus auratus). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 99, 11742-11747.
22. Heath DD, Busch C, Kelly J, Atagi DY (2002) Temporal change in genetic structure and effective population size in steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Molecular Ecology, 11, 197-214.
23. Hedrick PW (2005a) Genetics of Populations, 3rd edn. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Boston.
24. Hedrick PW (2005b) Large variance in reproductive success and the Ne/N ratio. Evolution, 59, 1596-1599.
25. Hedrick PW, Hedgecock D, Hamelberg S, Croci SJ (2000) The impact of supplementation in winter-run chinook salmon on effective population size. The Journal of Heredity, 91, 112-116.
26. Husband B, Barrett S (1992) Effective population size and genetic drift in tristylous Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae). Evolution, 46, 1875-1890.
27. Jones MW, Hutchings JA (2002) Individual variation in Atlantic salmon fertilization success: Implications for effective population size. Ecological Applications, 12, 184-193.
28. Kalinowski ST, Waples RS (2002) Relationship of effective to census size in fluctuating populations. Conservation Biology, 16, 129-136.
29. Kostow KE (2004) Differences in juvenile phenotypes and survival between hatchery stocks and a natural population provide evidence for modified selection due to captive breeding. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 61, 577-589.
30. Leber KM (2004) Stock Enhancement and Sea Ranching: Developments, Pitfalls and Opportunities, 2nd edn. Blackwell Publications, Oxford, UK.
31. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LE, Pemberton JM (1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Molecular Ecology, 7, 639-655.
32. Martinez JL, Moran P, Perez J et al. (2000) Multiple paternity increases effective size of southern Atlantic salmon populations. Molecular Ecology, 9, 293-298.
33. Matocq MD (2004) Reproductive success and effective population size in woodrats (Neotoma macrotis). Molecular Ecology, 13, 1635-1642.
34. Muñoz RC, Warner RR (2003) A new version of the size-advantage hypothesis for sex change: Incorporating sperm competition and size-fecundity skew. American Naturalist, 161, 749-761.
35. Nelson RJ, Beacham TD, Small MP (1998) Microsatellite analysis of the population structure of a Vancouver island sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) stock complex using nondenaturing gel electrophoresis. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology, 7, 312-319.
36. Nunney L (1993) The influence of mating system and overlapping generations on effective population size. Evolution, 47, 1329-1341.
37. Nunney L (1995) Measuring the ratio of effective population size to adult numbers using genetic and ecological data. Evolution, 49, 389-392.
38. Olney PJS, Mace GM, Feistner A (1994) Creative Conservation: Interactive Management of Wild and Captive Animals, 1st edn. Chapman & Hall, London.
39. Olsen EA (2003) Hood River and Pelton ladder evaluation studies. In: Annual Report 2000-01 of the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Portland.
40. Pray LA, Goodnight CJ, Stevens L, Schwartz JM, Yan G (1996) The effect of population size on effective population size: an empirical study in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum. Genetical Research, 68, 151-155.
41. Ryman N, Laikre L (1991) Effects of supportive breeding on the genetically effective population size. Conservation Biology, 5, 325-329.
42. Salmon Recovery Science Review Panel (2004) Report for meeting held August 30-September 2, 2004, Northwest fisheries science center, National marine fisheries service, Seattle, Washington. Available from http://www.nwfsc.noaa. gov/trt/ rsrpreportsept30_2004b.pdf.
43. Scribner KT, Arntzen JW, Burke T (1997) Effective number of breeding adults in Bufo bufo estimated from age-specific variation at minisatellite loci. Molecular Ecology, 6, 701-712.
44. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry: the Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, 3rd edn. W.H. Freeman, New York.
45. Storz JF, Ramakrishnan U, Alberts SC (2002) Genetic effective size of a wild primate population: influence of current and historical demography. Evolution, 56, 817-829.
46. Turner TF, Wares JP, Gold JR (2002) Genetic effective size is three orders of magnitude smaller than adult census size in an abundant, Estuarine-dependent marine fish (Sciaenops ocellatus). Genetics, 162, 1329-1339.
47. Wade MJ, Shuster SM (2004) Sexual selection: Harem size and the variance in male reproductive success. The American Naturalist, 164, E83-E89.
48. Wang J, Ryman N (2001) Genetic effects of multiple generations of supportive breeding. Conservation Biology, 15, 1619-1631.
49. Waples RS (2002a) Effective size of fluctuating salmon populations. Genetics, 161, 783-791.
50. Waples RS (2002b) Evaluating the effect of stage-specific survivorship on the N(e)/N ratio. Molecular Ecology, 11, 1029-1037.
51. Waples RS (2004) Salmonid insights into effective population size. In: Evolution Illuminated: Salmon and Their Relatives (eds Hendry AP, Stearns SC), pp. 295-314. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
52. Waples RS (2006a) Seed banks, salmon, and sleeping genes: effective population size in semelparous, age-structured species with fluctuating abundance. American Naturalist, 167, 118-135.
53. Waples RS (2006b) A bias correction for estimates of effective population size based on linkage disequilibrium at unlinked gene loci. Conservation Genetics, 7, 167-184.
54. Waples RS, Do C (1994) Genetic risk associated with supplementation of Pacific salmonids: captive broodstock programs. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 51 (Suppl. 1), 310-329.
55. Zimmerman CE, Reeves GH (2000) Population structure of sympatric anadromous and nonanadromous Oncorhynchus mykiss: evidence from spawning surveys and otolith microchemistry. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 57, 2152-2162.