Typical atypical findings on dynamic MRI of the breast

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 76, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 195-210

  Kurz, Kathinka D ^a   Roy, Sumit ^a   Mödder, Ulrich ^b   Skaane, Per ^c   Saleh, Andreas ^b  

^a STAVANGER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL DÜSSELDORF   (Germany)

^c ULLEVÅL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Clinical management; Diagnosis; Differential image interpretation; Magnetic resonance imaging

Indexed keywords

AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGIES; BENIGN LESION; BI-RADS; BREAST CANCER; BREAST DISEASE; BREAST IMAGING; BREAST LESION; CLINICAL MANAGEMENT; CLINICAL PRACTICES; DATA SYSTEMS; DIAGNOSTIC PROBLEM; DIFFERENTIAL IMAGE; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; DYNAMIC MRI; MALIGNANT TUMORS; ON DYNAMICS;

DIAGNOSIS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; RADIOLOGY; RESONANCE;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

ARTIFACT; BENIGN TUMOR; BREAST ABSCESS; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST LESION; BREAST PAPILLOMA; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

ADULT; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78149359521     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.07.036     Document Type: Review

References (81)

1. C.K. Kuhl, P. Mielcareck, and S. Klaschik Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 211 1 1999 101 110
2. M.D. Schnall, J. Blume, and D.A. Bluemke Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study Radiology 238 1 2006 42 53
3. C.K. Kuhl, H.H. Schild, and N. Morakkabati Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution Radiology 236 3 2005 789 800
4. C. Kuhl The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice Radiology 244 2 2007 356 378
5. ACoR. ACR BI-RADS® - Magnetic Resonance Imaging. In: ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, Breast Imaging Atlas, editors. Radiology. Reston, VA: ACo; 2003.
6. J.P. Delille, P.J. Slanetz, and E.D. Yeh Physiologic changes in breast magnetic resonance imaging during the menstrual cycle: perfusion imaging, signal enhancement, and influence of the T1 relaxation time of breast tissue Breast J 11 4 2005 236 241
7. J.P. Delille, P.J. Slanetz, and E.D. Yeh Hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women: breast tissue perfusion determined with MR imaging - initial observations Radiology 235 1 2005 36 41
8. S.A. Jansen, X. Fan, and G.S. Karczmar DCEMRI of breast lesions: is kinetic analysis equally effective for both mass and nonmass-like enhancement? Med Phys 35 7 2008 3102 3109
9. S. Mussurakis, D.L. Buckley, and A. Horsman Dynamic MRI of invasive breast cancer: assessment of three region-of-interest analysis methods J Comput Assist Tomogr 21 3 1997 431 438
10. G.P. Liney, P. Gibbs, and C. Hayes Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the differentiation of breast tumors: user-defined versus semi-automated region-of-interest analysis J Magn Reson Imaging 10 6 1999 945 949
11. M.G. Hochman, S.G. Orel, and C.M. Powell Fibroadenomas: MR imaging appearances with radiologic-histopathologic correlation Radiology 204 1 1997 123 129
12. S. Wurdinger, A.B. Herzog, and D.R. Fischer Differentiation of phyllodes breast tumors from fibroadenomas on MRI AJR Am J Roentgenol 185 5 2005 1317 1321
13. D. Weinstein, S. Strano, and P. Cohen Breast fibroadenoma: mapping of pathophysiologic features with three-time-point, contrast-enhanced MR imaging - pilot study Radiology 210 1 1999 233 240
14. A. Teifke, A. Hlawatsch, and T. Beier Undetected malignancies of the breast: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging at 1.0 T Radiology 224 3 2002 881 888
15. E.A. Sadowski, and F. Kelcz Frequency of malignancy in lesions classified as probably benign after dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI examination J Magn Reson Imaging 21 5 2005 556 564
16. M. Kriege, C.T. Brekelmans, and I.M. Obdeijn Factors affecting sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography and MRI in women with an inherited risk for breast cancer Breast Cancer Res Treat 2006
17. S. Ghai, D. Muradali, and K. Bukhanov Nonenhancing breast malignancies on MRI: sonographic and pathologic correlation AJR Am J Roentgenol 185 2 2005 481 487
18. X. Gallardo, M. Sentis, and E. Castaner Enhancement of intramammary lymph nodes with lymphoid hyperplasia: a potential pitfall in breast MRI Eur Radiol 8 9 1998 1662 1665
19. H. Ojeda-Fournier, K.A. Choe, and M.C. Mahoney Recognizing and interpreting artifacts and pitfalls in MR imaging of the breast Radiographics 27 Suppl. 1 2007 S147 S164
20. A. Coulthard, and A.J. Potterton Pitfalls of breast MRI Br J Radiol 73 870 2000 665 671
21. J.A. Harvey Unusual breast cancers: useful clues to expanding the differential diagnosis Radiology 242 3 2007 683 694
22. A. Iglesias, M. Arias, and P. Santiago Benign breast lesions that simulate malignancy: magnetic resonance imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 36 2 2007 66 82
23. K.J. Macura, R. Ouwerkerk, and M.A. Jacobs Patterns of enhancement on breast MR images: interpretation and imaging pitfalls Radiographics 26 6 2006 1719 1734 quiz 1719
24. M. Bazzocchi, C. Zuiani, and P. Panizza Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial AJR Am J Roentgenol 186 6 2006 1723 1732
25. N. Morakkabati-Spitz, C. Leutner, and H. Schild Diagnostic usefulness of segmental and linear enhancement in dynamic breast MRI Eur Radiol 15 9 2005 2010 2017
26. H. Neubauer, M. Li, and R. Kuehne-Heid High grade and non-high grade ductal carcinoma in situ on dynamic MR mammography: characteristic findings for signal increase and morphological pattern of enhancement Br J Radiol 76 901 2003 3 12
27. A.P. Schouten van der Velden, C. Boetes, and P. Bult The value of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis and size assessment of in situ and small invasive breast carcinoma Am J Surg 192 2 2006 172 178
28. S.A. Jansen, G.M. Newstead, and H. Abe Pure ductal carcinoma in situ: kinetic and morphologic MR characteristics compared with mammographic appearance and nuclear grade Radiology 245 3 2007 684 691
29. J.H. Menell, E.A. Morris, and D.D. Dershaw Determination of the presence and extent of pure ductal carcinoma in situ by mammography and magnetic resonance imaging Breast J 11 6 2005 382 390
30. C.K. Kuhl, S. Schrading, and H.B. Bieling MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study Lancet 370 9586 2007 485 492
31. M.N. Mariano, M.A. van den Bosch, and B.L. Daniel Contrast-enhanced MRI of ductal carcinoma in situ: characteristics of a new intensity-modulated parametric mapping technique correlated with histopathologic findings J Magn Reson Imaging 22 4 2005 520 526
32. R. Matsubayashi, Y. Matsuo, and G. Edakuni Breast masses with peripheral rim enhancement on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images: correlation of MR findings with histologic features and expression of growth factors Radiology 217 3 2000 841 848
33. M.D. Pickles, M. Lowry, and D.J. Manton Role of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in monitoring early response of locally advanced breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy Breast Cancer Res Treat 91 1 2005 1 10
34. S.H. Heywang-Kobrunner, A. Schlegel, and R. Beck Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast after limited surgery and radiation therapy J Comput Assist Tomogr 17 6 1993 891 900
35. A. Rieber, E. Merkle, and H. Zeitler Value of MR mammography in the detection and exclusion of recurrent breast carcinoma J Comput Assist Tomogr 21 5 1997 780 784
36. J.S. Silverman, and A. Tamsen Mammary fibroadenoma and some phyllodes tumour stroma are composed of CD34+ fibroblasts and factor XIIIa+ dendrophages Histopathology 29 5 1996 411 419
37. C.K. Kuhl, S. Klaschik, and P. Mielcarek Do T2-weighted pulse sequences help with the differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions in dynamic breast MRI? J Magn Reson Imaging 9 2 1999 187 196
38. L.W. Nunes, M.D. Schnall, and S.G. Orel Update of breast MR imaging architectural interpretation model Radiology 219 2 2001 484 494
39. R.L. Egan, and M.B. McSweeney Intramammary lymph nodes Cancer 51 10 1983 1838 1842
40. I.H. Jadusingh Intramammary lymph nodes J Clin Pathol 45 11 1992 1023 1026
41. S. Svane GFranzen Radiologic appearance of nonpalpable intramammary lymph nodes Acta Radiol 34 6 1993 577 580
42. K.A. Kvistad, J. Rydland, and H.B. Smethurst Axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer: preoperative detection with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI Eur Radiol 10 9 2000 1464 1471
43. T. Kinoshita, N. Yashiro, and J. Yoshigi Inflammatory intramammary lymph node mimicking the malignant lesion in dynamic MRI: a case report Clin Imaging 26 4 2002 258 262
44. S.G. Orel, M.D. Schnall, and V.A. LiVolsi Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation Radiology 190 2 1994 485 493
45. Kuhl CK Concepts for differential diagnosis in breast MR imaging Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 14 3 2006 305 328 v
46. A. Linda, V. Londero, and F. Mazzarella Rare breast neoplasms: is there any peculiar feature on magnetic resonance mammography? Radiol Med (Torino) 112 6 2007 850 862
47. M.H. Pui, and I.J. Movson Fatty tissue breast lesions Clin Imaging 27 3 2003 150 155
48. A. Qayyum, R.L. Birdwell, and B.L. Daniel MR imaging features of infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast: histopathologic correlation AJR Am J Roentgenol 178 5 2002 1227 1232
49. K. Schelfout, M. Van Goethem, and E. Kersschot Preoperative breast MRI in patients with invasive lobular breast cancer Eur Radiol 14 7 2004 1209 1216
50. W.T.L.-P.H. Yang, H. Macapinlac, and S. Catkaci Inflammatory breast cancer: PET/CT, MRI, mammography, and sonography findings Breast Cancer Res Treat 2007
51. C. Boetes, J. Veltman, and L. van Die The role of MRI in invasive lobular carcinoma Breast Cancer Res Treat 86 1 2004 31 37
52. P.S. Skaane, and F. kjorten Ultrasonographic evaluation of invasive lobular carcinoma Acta Radiol 40 4 1999 369 375
53. S.P. Weinstein, S.G. Orel, and R. Heller MR imaging of the breast in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma AJR Am J Roentgenol 176 2 2001 399 406
54. M. Hirose, T. Hashizume, and N. Seino Atlas of breast magnetic resonance imaging Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 36 2 2007 51 65
55. R.M. Mann, J. Veltman, and J.O. Barentsz The value of MRI compared to mammography in the assessment of tumour extent in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast Eur J Surg Oncol 2007
56. R. Tomczak, A. Rieber, and H. Zeitler The value of MR-mammography at 1.5 tesla in the differential diagnosis of non-puerperal mastitis and inflammatory breast carcinoma Rofo 165 2 1996 148 151
57. U. Fischer, R. Vosshenrich, and D. von Heyden Inflammatory lesions of the breast: indication for MR-mammography? Rofo 161 4 1994 307 311
58. K.W. Lee, S.Y. Chung, and I. Yang Inflammatory breast cancer: imaging findings Clin Imaging 29 1 2005 22 25
59. S.G. Diab, G.M. Clark, and C.K. Osborne Tumor characteristics and clinical outcome of tubular and mucinous breast carcinomas J Clin Oncol 17 5 1999 1442 1448
60. M. Kawashima, Y. Tamaki, and T. Nonaka MR imaging of mucinous carcinoma of the breast AJR Am J Roentgenol 179 1 2002 179 183
61. T. Okafuji, H. Yabuuchi, and S. Sakai MR imaging features of pure mucinous carcinoma of the breast Eur J Radiol 60 3 2006 405 413
62. L.W. Nunes, M.D. Schnall, and S.G. Orel Breast MR imaging: interpretation model Radiology 202 3 1997 833 841
63. L.W. Nunes, M.D. Schnall, and E.S. Siegelman Diagnostic performance characteristics of architectural features revealed by high spatial-resolution MR imaging of the breast AJR Am J Roentgenol 169 2 1997 409 415
64. G. Farshid, and G. Rush Assessment of 142 stellate lesions with imaging features suggestive of radial scar discovered during population-based screening for breast cancer Am J Surg Pathol 28 12 2004 1626 1631
65. T. Fasih, M. Jain, and J. Shrimankar All radial scars/complex sclerosing lesions seen on breast screening mammograms should be excised Eur J Surg Oncol 31 10 2005 1125 1128
66. F. Pediconi, R. Occhiato, and F. Venditti Radial scars of the breast: contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance mammography appearance Breast J 11 1 2005 23 28
67. E.M. Doyle, N. Banville, and C.M. Quinn Radial scars/complex sclerosing lesions and malignancy in a screening programme: incidence and histological features revisited Histopathology 50 5 2007 607 614
68. A.G. Douglas-Jones, J.L. Denson, and A.C. Cox Radial scar lesions of the breast diagnosed by needle core biopsy: analysis of cases containing occult malignancy J Clin Pathol 60 3 2007 295 298
69. S.E. Kirwan, E.R. Denton, and R.M. Nash Multiple 14G stereotactic core biopsies in the diagnosis of mammographically detected stellate lesions of the breast Clin Radiol 55 10 2000 763 766
70. J.N. Cawson, F. Malara, and A. Kavanagh Fourteen-gauge needle core biopsy of mammographically evident radial scars: is excision necessary? Cancer 97 2 2003 345 351
71. P. Rosen Benign papillary tumors Rosen's breast pathology 1997 Lippincott-Raven Philadelphia, PA p. 67-104
72. N. Bhattarai, Y. Kanemaki, and Y. Kurihara Intraductal papilloma: features on MR ductography using a microscopic coil AJR Am J Roentgenol 186 1 2006 44 47
73. H.D. Rovno, E.S. Siegelman, and C. Reynolds Solitary intraductal papilloma: findings at MR imaging and MR galactography AJR Am J Roentgenol 172 1 1999 151 155
74. B.L. Daniel, R.W. Gardner, and R.L. Birdwell Magnetic resonance imaging of intraductal papilloma of the breast Magn Reson Imaging 21 8 2003 887 892
75. C.K. Kuhl Current status of breast MR imaging. Part 2. Clinical applications Radiology 244 3 2007 672 691
76. P. Fu, Y. Kurihara, and Y. Kanemaki High-resolution MRI in detecting subareolar breast abscess AJR Am J Roentgenol 188 6 2007 1568 1572
77. A. Rieber, R.J. Tomczak, and P.J. Mergo MRI of the breast in the differential diagnosis of mastitis versus inflammatory carcinoma and follow-up J Comput Assist Tomogr 21 1 1997 128 132
78. M. Muller-Schimpfle, K. Ohmenhauser, and P. Stoll Menstrual cycle and age: influence on parenchymal contrast medium enhancement in MR imaging of the breast Radiology 203 1 1997 145 149
79. C.K. Kuhl, H.B. Bieling, and J. Gieseke Healthy premenopausal breast parenchyma in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: normal contrast medium enhancement and cyclical-phase dependency Radiology 203 1 1997 137 144
80. C. Boetes, S.P. Strijk, and R. Holland False-negative MR imaging of malignant breast tumors Eur Radiol 7 8 1997 1231 1234
81. C. Schorn, U. Fischer, and W. Doler Compression device to reduce motion artifacts at contrast-enhanced MR imaging in the breast Radiology 206 1 1998 279 282