The role of MRI in invasive lobular carcinoma

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Volumn 86, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 31-37

  Boetes, Carla ^a   Veltman, Jeroen ^a   Die, Lya Van ^a   Bult, Peter ^a   Wobbes, Theo ^a   Barentsz, Jelle O ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

breast; cancer; lobular carcinoma; MRI

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INVASIVE CARCINOMA; LUNG CARCINOMA; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEASUREMENT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; TUMOR DIAGNOSIS; TUMOR VOLUME; ULTRASOUND;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, LOBULAR; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 3142713722     PISSN: 01676806     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:BREA.0000032921.10481.dc     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Fisher B, Redmond C, Fisher ER: The contribution of recent NSABP clinical trials of primary breast cancer therapy to an understanding of tumor biology - an overview of findings. Cancer 46: 1009-1025, 1980
2. Newstead GM, Baute PB, Toth HK: Invasive lobular and ductal carcinoma: mammographic findings and stage at diagnosis. Radiology 184: 623-627, 1992
3. Krecke KN, Gisvold JJ: Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: mammographic findings and extent of disease at diagnosis in 184 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 161: 957-960, 1993
4. Hilleren DJ, Andersson IT, Lindholm K, Linnell FS: Invasive lobular carcinoma: mammographic findings in a 10-year experience. Radiology 178: 149-154, 1991
5. Holland R, Hendriks JH, Mravunac M: Mammographically occult breast cancer. A pathologic and radiologic study. Cancer 52: 1810-1819, 1983
6. Paramagul CP, Helvie MA, Adler DD: Invasive lobular carcinoma: sonographic appearance and role of sonography in improving diagnostic sensitivity. Radiology 195: 231-234, 1995
7. Butler RS, Venta LA, Wiley EL, Ellis RL, Dempsey PJ, Rubin E: Sonographic evaluation of infiltrating lobular carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172: 325-330, 1999
8. Orel SG, Schnall MD, Powell CM, Hochman MG, Solin LJ, Fowble BL, Torosian MH, Rosato EF: Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect of MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy. Radiology 196: 115-122, 1995
9. Morris EA, Schwartz LH, Dershaw DD, van Zee KJ, Abramson AF, Liberman L: MR imaging of the breast in patients with occult primary breast carcinoma. Radiology 205: 437-440, 1997
10. Mumtaz H, Hall C, Davidson T, Walmsley K, Thurell W, Kissin MW, Taylor I: Staging of symptomatic primary breast cancer with MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169: 417-424, 1997
11. Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E: Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology 213: 881-888, 1999
12. Rodenko GN, Harms SE, Pruneda JM, Farrell RS Jr, Evans WP, Copit DS, Krakos PA, Flamig DP: MR imaging in the management before surgery of lobular carcinoma of the breast: correlation with pathology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 167: 1415-1419, 1996
13. Weinstein SP, Orel SG, Heller R, Reynolds C, Czerniecki B, Solin LJ, Schnall M: MR imaging of the breast in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176: 399-406, 2001
14. Gribbestad IS, Nilsen G, Fjosne H, Fougner R, Haugen OA, Petersen SB, Rinck PA, Kvinnsland S: Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Acta Oncol 31: 833-842, 1992
15. Harms SE, Flamig DP, Evans WP, Harries SA, Brown S: MR imaging of the breast: current status and future potential. AJR Am J Roentgenol 163: 1039-1047, 1994
16. Amano G, Ohuchi N, Ishibashi T, Ishida T, Amari M, Satomi S: Correlation of three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging with precise histopathological map concerning carcinoma extension in the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat 60: 43-55, 2000
17. Davis PL, Staiger MJ, Harris KB, Ganott MA, Klementaviciene J, McCarty KS Jr, Tobon H: Breast cancer measurements with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, and mammography. Breast Cancer Res Treat 37: 1-9, 1996
18. Boetes C, Mus RD, Holland R, Barentsz JO, Strijk SP, Wobbes T, Hendriks JH, Ruys SH: Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. Radiology 197: 743-747, 1995
19. Fobben ES, Rubin CZ, Kalisher L, Dembner AG, Seltzer MH, Santoro EJ: Breast MR imaging with commercially available techniques: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 196: 143-152, 1995
20. Schnitt SJ, Abner A, Gelman R, Connolly JL, Recht A, Duda RB, Eberlein TJ, Mayzel K, Silver B, Harris JR: The relationship between microscopic margins of resection and the risk of local recurrence in patients with breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy. Cancer 74: 1746-1751, 1994
21. DiBiase SJ, Komarnicky LT, Schwartz GF, Xie Y, Mansfield CM: The number of positive margins influences the outcome of women treated with breast preservation for early stage breast carcinoma. Cancer 82: 2212-2220, 1998
22. Smitt MC, Nowels KW, Zdeblick MJ, Jeffrey S, Carlson RW, Stockdale FE, Goffinet DR: The importance of the lumpectomy surgical margin status in long-term results of breast conservation. Cancer 76: 259-267, 1995
23. Mariani L, Salvadori B, Marubini E, Conti AR, Rovini D, Cusumano F, Rosolin T, Andreola S, Zucali R, Rilke F, Veronesi U: Ten year results of a randomised trial comparing two conservative treatment strategies for small size breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 34: 1156-1162, 1998
24. Veronesi U, Salvadori B, Luini A, Greco M, Saccozzi R, del Vecchio M, Mariani L, Zurrida S, Rilke F: Breast conservation is a safe method in patients with small cancer of the breast. Long-term results of three randomised trials on 1973 patients. Eur J Cancer 31A: 1574-1579, 1995
25. Egan RL: Multicentric breast carcinomas: clinical-radiographic-pathologic whole organ studies and 10-year survival. Cancer 49: 1123-1130, 1982
26. Adler OB, Engel A: Invasive lobular carcinoma. Mammographic pattern. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 152: 460-462, 1990
27. Ma L, Fishell E, Wright B, Hanna W, Allan S, Boyd NF: Case-control study of factors associated with failure to detect breast cancer by mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 84: 781-785, 1992
28. Tresserra F, Feu J, Grases PJ, Navarro B, Alegret X, Fernandez-Cid A: Assessment of breast cancer size: sonographic and pathologic correlation. J Clin Ultrasound 27: 485-491, 1999
29. Finlayson CA, MacDermott TA: Ultrasound can estimate the pathologic size of infiltrating ductal carcinoma. Arch Surg 135: 158-159, 2000
30. Kaiser WA: MRM promises earlier breast cancer diagnosis. Diagn Imaging (San Franc ) 14: 88-93, 1992
31. Allgayer B, Lukas P, Loos W, Kersting-Sommerhoff B: [The MRT of the breast with 2D-spin-echo and gradient-echo sequences in diagnostically problematic cases]. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 158: 423-427, 1993
32. Boetes C, Strijk SP, Holland R, Barentsz JO, Van Der Sluis RF, Ruijs JH: False-negative MR imaging of malignant breast tumors. Eur Radiol 7: 1231-1234, 1997
33. Kristoffersen WM, Aspelin P, Perbeck L, Bone B: Value of MR imaging in clinical evaluation of breast lesions. Acta Radiol 43: 275-281, 2002