Pitfalls on breast MRI

British Journal of Radiology

Volumn 73, Issue 870, 2000, Pages 665-671

  Coulthard, A ^a   Potterton, A J ^a  

^a ROYAL VICTORIA INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BODY MOVEMENT; BREAST EXAMINATION; DEVICE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT POSITIONING; PHYSIOLOGY; POSITION EFFECT;

EID: 0034078297     PISSN: 00071285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/bjr.73.870.10911793     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Weinreb JC, Newstead G. Controversies in breast MRI. Magn Reson Q 1994;10:67-83.
2. Orel SG, Hochman MG, Schnall MD, Reynolds C, Sullivan DC. High-resolution MR imaging of the breast: clinical context. Radiographics 1996;16: 1385-401.
3. Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Viehweg P, Heinig A, Kuchler C. Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: accuracy, value, controversies, solutions. Eur J Radiol 1997;24:94-108.
4. Cohen EK, Leonhardt CM, Shumak RS, Soutar IC, Bukhanov K, Fishell EK, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in potential postsurgical recurrence of breast cancer: pitfalls and limitations. Can Assoc Radiol J 1996;47:171-6.
5. Boetes C, Strijk SP, Holland R, Barentsz JO, Van Der Sluis RF, Ruijs JH. False-negative MR imaging of malignant breast tumors. Eur Radiol 1997;7:1231-4.
6. Kuhl CK, Bieling HB, Gieseke J, Kreft BP, Sommer T, Lutterbey G, et al. Healthy premenopausal breast parenchyma in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: normal contrast medium enhancement and cyclical-phase dependency. Radiology 1997;203:137-44.
7. Rieber A, Zeitler H, Rosenthal H, Gorich J, Kreienberg R, Brambs HJ, et al. MRI of breast cancer: influence of chemotherapy on sensitivity. Br J Radiol 1997;70:452-8.
8. Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Schlegel A, Beck R, Wendt T, Kellner W, Lommatzsch B, et al. Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast after limited surgery and radiation therapy. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993;17:891-900.